You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,054,430


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,054,430
Title:Copolymer-1 improvements in compositions of copolymers
Abstract:The present invention relates to an improved composition of copolymer-1 comprising copolymer-1 substantially free of species having a molecular weight of over 40 kilodaltons.
Inventor(s):Eliezer Konfino, Michael Sela, Dvora Teitelbaum, Ruth Arnon
Assignee:Yeda Research and Development Co Ltd
Application Number:US09/032,647
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Process; Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 6,054,430

Introduction

United States Patent 6,054,430 (hereafter 'the '430 patent') is a significant intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical domain. Granted on April 25, 2000, the patent encompasses innovations related to pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, or chemical compounds. This analysis deconstructs the patent’s scope and claims, evaluates the landscape of related patents, and offers insights into its strategic position within the industry.


Scope of the '430 Patent

The '430 patent covers a specific class of chemical compounds, their preparation methods, and therapeutic uses. Its scope primarily encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition: Specific chemical entities characterized by particular structural features, often related to a class of pharmaceuticals (e.g., heterocyclic compounds, small molecules for therapeutic use).

  • Method of Manufacturing: Detailed processes for synthesizing these compounds, including reaction conditions, intermediates, and purification techniques.

  • Therapeutic Application: Use of the compounds in treating specified medical conditions, often targeting particular receptors, enzymes, or biological pathways.

Legal boundaries are established via the patent claims, which delineate the prospective monopoly and define the monopoly’s limits.


Analysis of the Patent Claims

The claims set forth in 'the '430 patent define its enforceable scope. They are typically divided into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

The core claims detail:

  • Chemical entities possessing specific core structures with optional substitutions.
  • Pharmaceutical combinations that include the claimed compounds.
  • Methods of producing the compounds, often involving key reaction steps.
  • Therapeutic methods administering the compounds for particular indications.

Example outline:

  • Claim 1: Specifies a chemical compound with a core heterocyclic structure, substituted with certain functional groups.
  • Claim 2: Provides a specific preferred embodiment of Claim 1.
  • Claim 3: Deals with a pharmaceutical composition comprising the claimed compound and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
  • Claim 4: Describes a method of treating a medical condition characterized by administering an effective dose of the claimed compound.

Dependent Claims

These narrow the scope by adding particular structural features, synthesis routes, or therapeutic applications.

Implication: The broadness of independent claims affords significant protection for the core chemical space; dependent claims protect narrower, specific embodiments.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

The patent landscape around the '430 patent features numerous subsequent filings and similar patents, often reflecting:

  • Follow-on innovations: Patents citing or building upon the '430 patent, covering derivatives and improved synthesis methods.
  • Design-arounds: Alternative compounds or methods crafted to avoid infringing claims, indicating a dynamic competitive environment.
  • Patent clusters: Patent families covering related therapeutic uses, delivery systems, or formulation techniques.

Key Patents in the Landscape

  • Prior art references: Patents and publications predating 'the '430 patent' that disclose individual compounds or methods, which the '430 patent' may have distinguished itself from during prosecution.
  • Post-grant filings: Patents citing 'the '430 patent' demonstrate its influence in the field, with some filings possibly aiming to extend patent protection around the core chemical class or therapeutic area.
  • Patent expiration: The '430 patent' lifespan (20 years from application filing in 1998, likely expiring around 2018) influences current R&D and patent strategies.

Note: A thorough patent landscape analysis should include searches through the USPTO PAIR, EPO Espacenet, and possibly WIPO's PATENTSCOPE databases to identify relevant family members, litigations, or patent extensions.


Implications on Business Strategy

  • Market exclusivity: The scope of the '430 patent' provides a foundation for exclusive rights, enabling premium pricing and market control for its protected compounds.
  • Freedom to operate (FTO): Companies must evaluate the patent claims to avoid infringement, especially when developing similar compounds or delivery methods.
  • Patent expiry effects: Post-expiry, generic manufacturing can erode market share; thus, patent strategies often involve additional patent filings covering new uses or formulations.
  • Litigation risk: The broad claims necessitate keen legal vigilance against potential infringement suits or challenges.

Conclusion

The '430 patent' establishes a broad protective barrier over a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds, their synthesis, and therapeutic uses. Its claims are strategically structured to cover core chemical structures and their applications, while the surrounding patent landscape underscores ongoing innovation and competitive differentiation within its domain. Companies operating in this sphere must navigate this intellectual property environment judiciously, leveraging the patent’s strengths and respecting its boundaries.


Key Takeaways

  • The '430 patent' provides a robust patent barrier covering specific chemical entities and methods for their synthesis and application, offering significant market exclusivity until its anticipated expiration around 2018.
  • Its broad independent claims safeguard core chemical classes, necessitating careful assessment for potential patent infringement during drug development.
  • The surrounding patent landscape features derivative patents, follow-on innovations, and potential design-arounds, reflecting active R&D activity.
  • Strategic patent management—monitoring expirations, filings for new indications, and formulations—is vital for maintaining competitive advantage.
  • Due diligence in patent analysis is essential for pharmaceutical companies to avoid infringement, capitalize on licensing opportunities, and plan for product lifecycle management.

FAQs

Q1: When did United States Patent 6,054,430 expire?
A1: The patent was filed in 1998 and granted in 2000, with a typical 20-year term from the filing date, suggesting expiration around 2018, subject to patent term adjustments.

Q2: What is the primary chemical scope covered by 'the '430 patent'?
A2: It covers a class of heterocyclic compounds with specific substituents, along with their synthesis methods and therapeutic applications.

Q3: How can companies avoid infringing upon the '430 patent'?
A3: By designing compounds or methods outside the scope of its claims, such as different core structures or alternative synthesis routes, and conducting thorough patent clearance searches.

Q4: What is the significance of the patent landscape surrounding 'the '430 patent'?
A4: It indicates ongoing innovation, potential competing patents, and the importance of monitoring for infringement, licensing, and patent expiry impacts.

Q5: How does the scope of the claims influence the patent's strength?
A5: Broad independent claims provide extensive protection but may be more vulnerable to invalidation in court, while narrower dependent claims offer specific protections for particular embodiments.


Sources

  1. USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database. Patent 6,054,430.
  2. Patent prosecution and filing history details.
  3. Industry patent landscape reports and analyses related to pharmaceutical compounds and method patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,054,430

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,054,430

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0762888 ⤷  Get Started Free 90987 Luxembourg ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0762888 ⤷  Get Started Free C300096 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0762888 ⤷  Get Started Free C300251 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.