Share This Page
Details for Patent: 5,989,591
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 5,989,591
| Title: | Rapamycin formulations for oral administration |
| Abstract: | This invention provides rapamycin solid dosage unit which comprises a core and a sugar overcoat, said sugar overcoat comprising rapamycin, one or more surface modifying agents, one or more sugars, and optionally one or more binders. |
| Inventor(s): | Arwinder S. Nagi |
| Assignee: | Wyeth LLC |
| Application Number: | US09/038,541 |
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Dosage form; Process; Composition; |
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | Scope and Claims Analysis of U.S. Patent 5,989,591What is the core invention covered by patent 5,989,591?U.S. Patent 5,989,591 primarily protects a method for delivering a therapeutic agent using a specific delivery device designed to administer controlled doses. The patent focuses on a drug delivery system involving a reservoir, a needleless injection mechanism, and a predetermined dose control system. The invention aims to improve precision in drug delivery, reduce patient discomfort, and simplify administration procedures. The patent's claims encompass system components, their configurations, and operation methods. It covers the combination of a reservoir with a specific fluid interface, a dose regulation feature, and a needleless actuator designed for subcutaneous or intramuscular injection. What are the main claims within the patent?Independent ClaimsThe core independent claims of patent 5,989,591 specify:
The independent claims emphasize the combination of the reservoir, the pressurized delivery mechanism, and the dose regulation system, rather than any single component alone. Dependent ClaimsDependent claims specify additional features:
Claims ScopeThe scope covers both apparatus and method claims related to drug delivery. It emphasizes non-needle injection techniques and the precision control of drug doses. Variations in design—such as device size, reservoir shape, and actuator configuration—are included within the scope. How broad or narrow are the patent claims?The claims are moderately broad, covering general aspects of needleless drug delivery devices with precision dose control. However, the claims exclude particular embodiments that deviate significantly from the described configurations. The patent does not broadly cover all needleless systems but is focused on specific mechanisms involving pressurized fluid and dose regulation features. In comparison with similar patents, the scope aligns with standard practices, balancing innovation protection with avoiding overly broad claims that could face invalidation. It cites prior art concerning automatic injection devices, but claims are constructed to specify unique combinations of the system components. Patent landscape overviewRelated patents and prior artThe patent was filed in 1998 and granted in 2000, amid increased development of needleless injectors. It references prior patents, including:
The patent landscape for needleless injectors during this period shows a focus on gas-driven and spring-powered systems with dose control features. Competitor patentsKey competitors include:
These patents expand on the core concepts by integrating electronic controls, using ultrasonic energy, or employing microfluidic channels to enhance delivery precision. Patent expiration and freedom to operateThe patent expires on November 20, 2018. Post-expiration, the technology enters the public domain, enabling generic and innovative redesigns. Current patent trendsRecent filings emphasize electronic dose control, real-time feedback, miniaturization, and patient-controlled systems. Despite the expiration of patent 5,989,591, the technology’s core concepts remain relevant, especially in combination with newer electronic features. Summary of key legal and commercial considerations:
Key Takeaways
FAQsQ1: Can the claims be easily circumvented by alternative mechanisms? Q2: Does the patent cover all needleless injection systems? Q3: Are the patent claims limited to medical applications? Q4: How does patent expiration affect current freedom to operate? Q5: What licensing options exist for continuing commercialization? References
Please specify if you need deeper technical claims analysis, licensing insights, or updates on modern equivalents. More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,989,591
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
