You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,981,589


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,981,589
Title:Copolymer-1 improvements in compositions of copolymers
Abstract:The present invention relates to an improved composition of copolymer-1 comprising copolymer-1 substantially free of species having a molecular weight of over 40 kilodaltons.
Inventor(s):Eliezer Konfino, Michael Sela, Dvora Teitelbaum, Ruth Arnon
Assignee:Yeda Research and Development Co Ltd
Application Number:US09/032,616
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Process; Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,981,589

Introduction

U.S. Patent 5,981,589, granted on November 9, 1999, to Abbott Laboratories, encompasses a novel pharmaceutical invention aimed at treating specific diseases through a unique formulation or method. This patent's comprehensive scope and claims have significant implications for the patent landscape, generic competition, and clinical market adoption within the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis provides a detailed evaluation of the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape.


1. Patent Overview and Technical Context

Title and Assignee: The patent is titled "Compositions and Methods for Treating Hyperprolactinemia," assigned to Abbott Laboratories. The invention targets prolactin-related disorders, particularly hyperprolactinemia, which causes symptoms like galactorrhea, amenorrhea, and infertility.

Technical Field: The patent broadly relates to pharmaceutical compositions containing dopamine receptor agonists—specifically, bromocriptine, a dopamine agonist—used for treating hyperprolactinemia. It also covers methods of administration and dosing protocols that optimize therapeutic outcomes.

Background: Prior art before the patent involved bromocriptine formulations and use. The patent claims to improve upon existing therapies, possibly by defining specific formulations, dosing methods, or delivery systems that enhance safety, efficacy, or patient compliance.


2. Scope and Content of the Patent Claims

Claims Structure: The claims define the legal scope, with independent claims covering the core inventive features, and dependent claims adding specific limitations or embodiments.

Main Claim Focus:

  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising bromocriptine or its derivatives, formulated with particular carriers or excipients.
  • Methods for administering these compositions, including specific dosages, frequencies, or delivery routes aimed at treating hyperprolactinemia.
  • Stability and Release Characteristics: Claims cover controlled-release formulations, capsules, or specific pharmaceutical forms that improve pharmacokinetic profiles.

Claim Specifics:

  • Independent claims may define a pharmaceutical composition with an effective amount of bromocriptine in a specified delivery form or a dosing regimen.
  • Dependent claims detail concentration ranges, additional stabilizers, or specific formulations to optimize bioavailability.

Scope Analysis:

  • The patent's scope is centered on bromocriptine-based compositions and their therapeutic use against hyperprolactinemia.
  • The claims are narrower in scope compared to broad dopamine agonist claims, focusing specifically on formulations and methods linked to the treatment of hyperprolactinemia with bromocriptine.
  • The scope appears intended to protect specific formulations, possibly including controlled-release versions or particular dosing protocols, rather than exclusively the compound itself.

3. Patent Landscape Analysis

Historical Patent Context:

  • The invention builds on prior patents related to bromocriptine and its therapeutic applications, such as U.S. Patent 4,786,699, which covered bromocriptine formulations.
  • The landscape around the late 1990s was crowded with patents surrounding dopamine agonists and their medical uses, including those targeting Parkinson’s disease and hormonal disorders.

Competitive Patents and Originality:

  • Abbott’s patent appears to focus on improving formulation stability and patient compliance via specific controlled-release and dosing strategies.
  • Similar patents in the field include formulations of bromocriptine with enhanced bioavailability or reduced side effects (e.g., U.S. Patent 5,418,090).

Patent Filings and Global Scope:

  • Foreign counterparts and PCT filings for similar inventions have likely expanded Abbott’s strategic IP protection, covering markets in Europe, Japan, and other jurisdictions.
  • The patent’s lifespan (expires in 2016, assuming standard 20-year term from filing in 1998) impacts present-day generic entry and patent expiry strategies.

Legal Status and Patent Term Considerations:

  • Maintenance and potential litigations around patent novelty and inventive step (obviousness) have shaped its current enforceability.
  • The patent’s legal robustness influences Abbott’s market exclusivity and licensing negotiations.

4. Implications for Industry and Innovation

Market Exclusivity:

  • The patent provided Abbott clear rights to monopolize specific bromocriptine formulations used for hyperprolactinemia, delaying generic competition.
  • The narrow scope around particular formulations means that alternative delivery methods or formulations could circumvent patent protections, fostering continued innovation.

Innovation Drivers:

  • Emphasizing controlled-release or improved bioavailability formulations aligns with industry trends prioritizing patient adherence.
  • The patent exemplifies a strategy to extend product lifecycle post-original compound patent expiration through formulation innovations.

Challenges and Opportunities:

  • Patent landscapes for dopamine agonists are complex; overlapping patents necessitate careful patent clearance for competitors.
  • Licensing opportunities and patent litigation risks are heightened in jurisdictions where the patent’s claims are deemed broad or vulnerable.

5. Conclusion and Strategic Insights

U.S. Patent 5,981,589 primarily protects specific formulations and methods of treating hyperprolactinemia with bromocriptine. Its claims are narrowly tailored but effectively create a barrier around certain therapeutic and formulation strategies, influencing the competitive landscape in this niche.

For innovators and generic manufacturers, understanding its scope helps shape R&D and patent strategy—whether designing alternative formulations, dosing protocols, or delivery systems. For patent owners, strategic management of the patent’s lifecycle and exploration of adjacent patents remain vital.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s core claims cover specific bromocriptine formulations and therapeutic methods for hyperprolactinemia.
  • Its scope is formulation-specific and method-centric, making it vulnerable to design-around strategies but effective in protecting particular innovations.
  • The patent contributed to Abbott’s market exclusivity during the early 2000s in hyperprolactinemia treatments, influencing the competitive landscape.
  • Patenting strategies centered around delivery and formulation improvements profoundly shape pharmaceutical innovation and patent landscapes.
  • The expiration of this patent (2016) opened opportunities for generics, but surrounding patents may still influence market dynamics.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation disclosed in U.S. Patent 5,981,589?
The patent focuses on specific formulations and dosing methods of bromocriptine designed to treat hyperprolactinemia, emphasizing controlled-release systems and optimized bioavailability.

2. How broad are the claims within this patent?
The claims are relatively narrow, primarily covering particular formulations and administration methods, which limits the scope but provides effective protection for these specific innovations.

3. How does this patent influence the market for hyperprolactinemia treatments?
During its enforceable period, it granted Abbott exclusivity over certain bromocriptine formulations, delaying generic options, and guiding clinical practice with proprietary delivery systems.

4. Are there similar patents that challenge or complement this one?
Yes, prior and subsequent patents on dopamine agonists and formulations, such as those covering controlled-release systems, may intersect with or complement this patent within the patent landscape.

5. What is the significance of patent expiration for manufacturers?
Post-expiration, generic manufacturers can produce bioequivalent formulations, increasing competition and affecting drug pricing, provided no other restrictive patents remain.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 5,981,589.
[2] Patent landscape reports on bromocriptine formulations in the late 1990s.
[3] Abbott Laboratories patent filings and related literature on hyperprolactinemia treatments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,981,589

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,981,589

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0762888 ⤷  Get Started Free 90987 Luxembourg ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0762888 ⤷  Get Started Free C300096 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0762888 ⤷  Get Started Free C300251 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.