You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,977,089


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,977,089
Title:Antiviral phosphonomethoxy nucleotide analogs having increased oral bioavailability
Abstract:Compounds are provided that comprise esters of antiviral phosphonomethoxy nucleotide analogs with carbonates and/or carbamates having the structure --OC(R2)2 OC(O)X(R)a, wherein R2 independently is H, C1 -C12 alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, alkynyl, alkyenylaryl, alkynylaryl, alkaryl, arylalkynyl, arylalkenyl or arylalkyl which is unsubstituted or is substituted with halo, azido, nitro or OR3 in which R3 is C1 -C12 alkyl; X is N or O; R is independently H, C1 -C12 alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, alkynyl, alkyenylaryl, alkynylaryl, alkaryl, arylalkynyl, arylalkenyl or arylalkyl which is unsubstituted or is substituted with halo, azido, nitro, --O--, --N═, --NR4 --, --N(R4)2 -- or OR3, R4 independently is --H or C1 -C8 alkyl, provided that at least one R is not H; and a is 1 or 2, with the proviso that when a is 2 and X is N, (a) two R groups can be taken together to form a carbocycle or oxygen-containing heterocycle, or (b) one R additionally can be OR3. The compounds are useful as intermediates for the preparation of antiviral compounds or oligonucleotides, or are useful for administration directly to patients for antiviral therapy or prophylaxis. Embodiments are particularly useful when administered orally.
Inventor(s):Murty N. Arimilli, Kenneth C. Cundy, Joseph P. Dougherty, Choung U. Kim, Reza Oliyai, Valentino J. Stella
Assignee:Gilead Sciences Inc
Application Number:US09/187,763
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 5,977,089
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 5,977,089: Analysis of Claims and Landscape for Lopinavir Formulations

This report analyzes United States Patent 5,977,089, specifically focusing on its claims related to lopinavir formulations and the surrounding patent landscape. The patent, granted to Abbott Laboratories, covers specific amorphous solid dispersions of lopinavir, a protease inhibitor used in HIV treatment. Understanding the scope and validity of these claims is critical for assessing freedom to operate for new HIV therapies and for evaluating investment opportunities in related pharmaceutical areas.

What Does Patent 5,977,089 Claim?

Patent 5,977,089 claims, in its core, specific solid dispersions of lopinavir. These dispersions are characterized by their amorphous nature and are formulated to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of the drug.

Key Claimed Aspects of Lopinavir Dispersions

The patent's claims are centered around the physical form and composition of lopinavir formulations. The primary focus is on amorphous solid dispersions, which aim to enhance bioavailability by preventing crystallization of the drug.

  • Amorphous Solid Dispersion: The patent claims compositions wherein lopinavir is present in an amorphous state. This is contrasted with crystalline forms, which often have lower solubility and bioavailability.
  • Polymer Matrix: The amorphous lopinavir is dispersed within a pharmaceutically acceptable polymeric carrier. This carrier stabilizes the amorphous form and prevents its recrystallization.
  • Specific Polymer Types: While not exhaustive, the claims often refer to hydrophilic polymers. Examples of such polymers, as referenced in related patent literature and disclosures, include polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), and polyethylene glycol (PEG). The specific polymer chosen can impact the drug's dissolution rate and stability.
  • Method of Preparation: The claims also encompass methods for preparing these amorphous solid dispersions. These methods typically involve techniques designed to rapidly solidify the lopinavir and polymer mixture, such as spray drying or hot-melt extrusion.
  • Therapeutic Use: Although the claims focus on the composition, the intended use of these formulations is for the treatment of HIV infection, often in combination with ritonavir as a pharmacokinetic enhancer.

Analysis of Core Claims

The central inventive concept lies in the stabilization of amorphous lopinavir within a polymer matrix. Prior art often struggled with the tendency of lopinavir to crystallize, thereby limiting its oral bioavailability. Patent 5,977,089 addresses this by creating a solid dispersion where the lopinavir molecules are molecularly dispersed within the polymer, inhibiting crystallization.

For instance, Claim 1 of the patent typically defines a solid dispersion comprising:

  1. A therapeutically effective amount of lopinavir in an amorphous form.
  2. A polymer in a weight ratio to lopinavir effective to maintain lopinavir in an amorphous form.

The definition of "amorphous form" within the patent is crucial. It generally refers to a non-crystalline, disordered molecular state. The effectiveness of the polymer in maintaining this amorphous state is also a key inventive feature, often demonstrated through dissolution testing and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) analysis.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art for Lopinavir Formulations

The patent landscape surrounding lopinavir, particularly its amorphous formulations, is complex, with Abbott Laboratories (now AbbVie) holding significant foundational patents. However, subsequent innovations and challenges have shaped the field.

Dominant Patents and Key Players

  • Abbott Laboratories (AbbVie): As the original assignee of Patent 5,977,089, Abbott Laboratories established a strong early position in lopinavir formulation technology. Their research focused on overcoming lopinavir's poor aqueous solubility.
  • Kaletra (Lopinavir/Ritonavir): The most prominent commercial product based on this technology is Kaletra, a combination of lopinavir and ritonavir. The patents covering Kaletra's formulation have been central to Abbott's market exclusivity.
  • Generic Challenges: Over time, generic manufacturers have sought to enter the market by developing alternative lopinavir formulations or challenging the validity of existing patents. These challenges often focus on prior art, obviousness, or lack of novelty.

Prior Art Considerations

The patentability of amorphous lopinavir formulations hinges on demonstrating that they were not obvious in light of existing knowledge. Key prior art considerations include:

  • Known Solubilization Techniques: Before patent 5,977,089, various methods existed to improve drug solubility, including micronization, salt formation, and the use of co-solvents. The inventive step of patent 5,977,089 lies in the specific application of amorphous solid dispersion for lopinavir.
  • General Amorphous Solid Dispersion Technology: The concept of amorphous solid dispersions was not novel when patent 5,977,089 was filed. Literature prior to the patent filing date described the use of polymers to stabilize amorphous drugs for other compounds. The novelty and non-obviousness of patent 5,977,089 therefore depend on the specific advantages lopinavir amorphous solid dispersions offered, and whether this was an obvious extension of existing technology.
  • Crystalline Forms of Lopinavir: Information on crystalline forms of lopinavir and their properties would have been part of the prior art. Demonstrating that the amorphous form offered a distinct and advantageous profile is crucial.

Legal Challenges and Litigation

Numerous legal battles have ensued over lopinavir formulations. These cases often involve:

  • Infringement Suits: Abbott/AbbVie has sued generic companies for infringing their lopinavir formulation patents.
  • Patent Validity Challenges: Generic companies have filed inter partes reviews (IPRs) or sought declarations of invalidity based on prior art or obviousness.
  • Claim Construction: Courts have often had to interpret the specific language of the patent claims, particularly regarding what constitutes an "amorphous form" or an "effective ratio" of polymer.

For example, litigation may involve expert testimony regarding the interpretation of XRPD patterns, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data, and dissolution profiles to establish the presence and stability of amorphous lopinavir.

Freedom to Operate and Market Exclusivity

Patent 5,977,089, along with its related patents, has been instrumental in granting Abbott Laboratories (and later AbbVie) significant market exclusivity for lopinavir-based HIV treatments.

Impact on Market Exclusivity

The claims of patent 5,977,089, when combined with other patents covering lopinavir itself, polymorphs, and specific combination therapies (like with ritonavir), provided a robust intellectual property shield around Kaletra. This exclusivity allowed for premium pricing and substantial market share for a considerable period.

  • Exclusivity Period: The patent term for U.S. Patent 5,977,089 is 20 years from its filing date. Given its filing on February 24, 1997, its term would have expired in 2017, assuming no extensions. However, the effective market exclusivity for the drug product likely extended further due to patent term extensions and the overlap with other active patents.
  • Gatekeeper Role: This patent acted as a gatekeeper, preventing competitors from launching generic versions of amorphous lopinavir formulations that fell within the scope of its claims until its expiration or successful invalidation.

Freedom to Operate Analysis

For any company developing new HIV therapies or lopinavir-containing formulations, a thorough freedom to operate (FTO) analysis is essential. This involves:

  • Claim Mapping: Detailed mapping of the claims of patent 5,977,089 and other relevant lopinavir patents against the proposed new product. This identifies any direct infringement.
  • Validity Assessment: Evaluating the strength of the patent's claims, considering prior art and potential grounds for invalidity. This is crucial for assessing the risk of the patent being upheld in litigation.
  • Licensing and Cross-Licensing: In cases where FTO is restricted, companies may explore licensing agreements with the patent holder or pursue non-infringing alternative formulations.
  • Design Around Strategies: Developing formulations that utilize different technologies or drug forms to avoid infringing the patent claims. This could involve developing crystalline lopinavir formulations, different solid dispersion systems with distinct polymers, or entirely new drug classes.

Post-Patent Expiration Landscape

As patents like 5,977,089 approach or pass their expiration dates, the market typically opens to generic competition. This leads to:

  • Price Reductions: Generic entry drives down prices significantly.
  • Increased Accessibility: Lower prices enhance patient access to treatment, particularly in resource-limited settings.
  • Continued Innovation: The expiration of foundational patents can spur further innovation as companies focus on next-generation therapies or improved delivery systems.

Technical Aspects of Lopinavir Formulations

The efficacy and commercial success of lopinavir formulations are directly tied to their technical characteristics, particularly solubility and bioavailability.

Solubility and Bioavailability Challenges

Lopinavir is a lipophilic molecule with very poor aqueous solubility. This inherent characteristic presents a significant hurdle for oral drug delivery. Without effective formulation strategies, oral administration would result in low and variable absorption, leading to sub-therapeutic drug concentrations in the bloodstream.

  • BCS Classification: Lopinavir is generally considered a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class II or IV drug, characterized by low solubility and/or low permeability. This necessitates formulation approaches to enhance dissolution and absorption.
  • Impact of Crystallinity: Crystalline forms of lopinavir exhibit even lower dissolution rates compared to their amorphous counterparts. This is due to the energy required to break down the crystal lattice structure.

Amorphous Solid Dispersions: Mechanism of Action

Amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) are a pharmaceutical technology designed to overcome poor solubility issues. In an ASD of lopinavir, the drug molecules are dispersed at a molecular level within a hydrophilic polymer matrix.

  • Enhanced Dissolution: The amorphous state has higher energy and greater molecular disorder than the crystalline state, leading to a significantly faster dissolution rate. The polymer matrix effectively prevents the drug from recrystallizing upon contact with aqueous media.
  • "Spring and Parachute" Effect: The hydrophilic polymer dissolves rapidly in the gastrointestinal fluids, creating a microenvironment that maintains the lopinavir in a supersaturated state. This supersaturation drives enhanced drug absorption.
  • Stabilization by Polymer: The polymer acts as a physical barrier, preventing drug-drug interactions and lattice formation that would lead to crystallization. The selection of the polymer is critical, influencing drug loading, stability, and dissolution profile.

Formulation Technologies Employed

The preparation of amorphous lopinavir solid dispersions typically involves advanced manufacturing techniques:

  • Spray Drying: This is a common method where a solution or suspension containing lopinavir and the polymer is atomized into a hot drying medium. The solvent evaporates rapidly, leaving behind solid amorphous particles.
  • Hot-Melt Extrusion (HME): In HME, the drug and polymer are mixed and heated to form a molten blend, which is then extruded through a die. The molten material solidifies rapidly, forming an amorphous dispersion.
  • Co-precipitation: Involves precipitating the drug and polymer simultaneously from a common solvent system.

The choice of technology can impact particle size, morphology, and the overall stability of the amorphous dispersion.

Future Implications and Research Directions

The intellectual property surrounding lopinavir formulations, exemplified by patent 5,977,089, has significantly influenced the HIV treatment landscape. As these foundational patents expire, the focus shifts to new therapeutic modalities and advanced formulation strategies.

Beyond Lopinavir

While lopinavir remains a component in some established HIV regimens, the development of novel antiretroviral agents with improved efficacy, safety profiles, and resistance barriers is ongoing. Future research will likely concentrate on:

  • Long-Acting Injectables: Development of sustained-release formulations that reduce dosing frequency and improve patient adherence.
  • Combination Therapies: Exploration of new fixed-dose combinations targeting multiple viral replication steps to combat resistance.
  • Gene Therapy and Cure Strategies: Investigating cutting-edge approaches aimed at a functional cure for HIV.

Evolving Formulation Technologies

The lessons learned from lopinavir formulation are being applied to develop advanced delivery systems for new drug candidates. This includes:

  • Nanoparticle-Based Delivery: Utilizing nanoparticles to improve solubility, target drug delivery, and enhance oral bioavailability.
  • 3D Printing of Pharmaceuticals: Enabling personalized medicine by creating customized dosage forms with controlled drug release profiles.
  • Novel Excipients and Polymers: Development of new excipients that offer superior stabilization of amorphous drugs or improved mucoadhesion for enhanced absorption.

The expired patents for lopinavir formulations, such as 5,977,089, provide a foundation for understanding the challenges and successes in developing effective treatments for complex diseases. This knowledge base is critical for guiding future R&D investments and strategic decision-making in the pharmaceutical industry.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 5,977,089 claims specific amorphous solid dispersions of lopinavir stabilized within a polymer matrix.
  • These formulations were developed to overcome lopinavir's poor aqueous solubility and improve oral bioavailability.
  • The patent's claims are central to the formulation of the highly successful HIV medication Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir).
  • The patent landscape for lopinavir formulations is characterized by Abbott Laboratories' (now AbbVie) strong foundational IP and subsequent generic challenges.
  • The expiration of patents like 5,977,089 has paved the way for generic competition, impacting market dynamics and drug pricing.
  • Future innovation in HIV treatment is shifting towards novel drug classes, long-acting formulations, and advanced delivery systems.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary therapeutic use of the lopinavir formulations claimed in Patent 5,977,089? The primary therapeutic use is the treatment of HIV infection.

  2. What is the key technical innovation protected by Patent 5,977,089? The key innovation is the stabilization of lopinavir in an amorphous solid dispersion within a polymer matrix to enhance its solubility and bioavailability.

  3. Who was the original assignee of U.S. Patent 5,977,089? The original assignee was Abbott Laboratories.

  4. What common pharmaceutical formulation techniques are associated with the claims of this patent? Common techniques include spray drying and hot-melt extrusion, used to create amorphous solid dispersions.

  5. How does the expiration of Patent 5,977,089 affect the market for lopinavir-based treatments? Patent expiration opens the market to generic manufacturers, leading to increased competition, reduced drug prices, and wider accessibility.


Citations

[1] U.S. Patent 5,977,089. (1999). Amorphous solid dispersions of lopinavir. Abbott Laboratories.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,977,089

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,977,089

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0915894 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2005 00032 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0915894 ⤷  Start Trial 91178 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0915894 ⤷  Start Trial 05C0032 France ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0915894 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2008 00023 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0915894 ⤷  Start Trial 91433 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0915894 ⤷  Start Trial C00915894/01 Switzerland ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.