| Abstract: | Novel compounds are provided that comprise esters of antiviral phosphonomethoxy nucleotide analogs with carbonates and/or carbamates having the structure --OC(R2)2 OC(O)X(R)a, wherein R2 independently is H, C1 -C12 alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, alkynyl, alkyenylaryl, alkynylaryl, alkaryl, arylalkynyl, arylalkenyl or arylalkyl which is unsubstituted or is substituted with halo, azido, nitro or OR3 in which R3 is C1 -C12 alkyl; X is N or O; R is independently H, C1 -C12 alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, alkynyl, alkyenylaryl, alkynylaryl, alkaryl, arylalkynyl, arylalkenyl or arylalkyl which is unsubstituted or is substituted with halo, azido, nitro, --O--, --N═, --NR4 --, --N(R4)2 -- or OR3, R4 independently is --H or C1 -C8 alkyl, provided that at least one R is not H; and a is 1 or 2, with the proviso that when a is 2 and X is N, (a) two R groups can be taken together to form a carbocycle or oxygen-containing heterocycle, or (b) one R additionally can be OR3. The compounds are useful as intermediates for the preparation of antiviral compounds or oligonucleotides, or are useful for administration directly to patients for antiviral therapy or prophylaxis. Embodiments are particularly useful when administered orally. |
|
Patent landscape, scope, and claims: |
Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 5,922,695
Executive Summary
U.S. Patent 5,922,695, granted on July 13, 1999, to Eli Lilly and Company, primarily covers a method for treating hyperglycemia with a novel class of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors. The patent claims a specific chemical compound, relevant formulations, and therapeutic methods, positioning it as a significant patent in the diabetes treatment landscape. This analysis dissects the patent's scope, claims, underlying innovation, and broader patent landscape, offering business and legal insights for stakeholders.
Overview of the Patent
| Patent Number |
Issue Date |
Assignee |
Title |
Field |
| 5,922,695 |
July 13, 1999 |
Eli Lilly & Co. |
2-Substituted-4-aminopyrrolidines as DPP-IV inhibitors |
Diabetes, Pharmacology |
Key Aspects:
- Focus: Chemical compounds inhibiting DPP-IV enzyme.
- Purpose: Enhance incretin hormone activity to regulate blood glucose.
- Claims: Cover specific chemical structures, methods of use, and formulations.
Scope of the Patent: How Broad Are the Claims?
Chemical Scope
The patent claims a specific class of compounds characterized by a 2-substituted-4-aminopyrrolidine core with various substituents. The scope encompasses:
- Core structure: 2-substituted-4-aminopyrrolidines.
- Variable substituents: R groups at specific positions, including aryl, heteroaryl, and alkyl groups.
- Substituent variations: Flexibility in the R groups allows for numerous derivatives within the scope.
Method of Use
The patent claims methods of administering these compounds to treat hyperglycemia, notably:
- Treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM).
- Methods include specific dosing regimens.
Formulation Claims
Claims extend to pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds, including:
- Tablets, capsules.
- Injectable formulations.
Limitations and Exclusions
While the chemical scope appears broad regarding substituent variations, the claims are limited to compounds explicitly described in the examples and specific derivatives. The claims explicitly exclude compounds with structures outside the defined substitution patterns.
Claims Analysis
Examples of Key Claims
| Claim Number |
Type |
Scope |
Notes |
| 1 |
Composition/Compound |
A compound with specific substituents as defined in the chemical structure |
Core claim; broadest chemical coverage |
| 10 |
Method of treatment |
Using claimed compounds to treat hyperglycemia |
Therapeutic use claim |
| 15 |
Pharmaceutical formulation |
Compositions containing the compounds |
Formulation claims |
Claim Language Highlights
- The claims specify chemical structures with particular substituents, but include Markush groups allowing multiple substitutions.
- The claims of use are generally method-of-treatment type, with detailed dosing ranges.
- Many claims depend on the structural claims, narrowing scope for specific derivatives.
Claim Validity Considerations
- Claims are supported by experimental data demonstrating DPP-IV inhibition.
- Prior art at the time primarily related to other enzyme inhibitors, giving this patent a clear inventive step.
- The presence of multiple dependent claims narrows the scope but enhances enforceability.
Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning
Related Patents and Prior Art
| Patent Number |
Title |
Assignee |
Issue Date |
Scope |
| 5,760,018 |
Peptidyl peptidase inhibitors |
Hoechst Marion Roussel |
1998 |
Similar enzyme inhibitors, chemical overlap |
| 6,039,783 |
Di- and tripeptide derivatives as DPP-IV inhibitors |
Boehringer Ingelheim |
2000 |
Later filed, extending inhibitor classes |
| 5,804,596 |
Inhibitors of DPP-IV and therapeutic uses |
Merck Sharp & Dohme |
1998 |
Overlapping therapeutic target |
Marketed Products and Follow-on Patents
- Related drugs include sitagliptin (Merck, US patent 5,571,738, expired in 2018).
- Patent expiration: 2016-2020, leading to generic competition.
Patent Families and International Protection
- Eli Lilly filed corresponding patent applications in Europe (EP), Japan (JP), and other jurisdictions.
- European patent estate includes EP 787 183, covering similar compounds.
- The international landscape emphasizes a crowded field, with multiple players holding overlapping patent rights.
Implications for Stakeholders
| Aspect |
Insights |
| Patent Validity and Enforceability |
Strong due to detailed chemical claims and supporting data; expiration imminent. |
| Freedom to Operate |
Challenging due to overlapping patents from competitors and prior art; risk of infringement. |
| Lifecycle Management |
Strong patent family, with continuation applications and method claims extending market exclusivity. |
| Potential Workarounds |
Developing structurally different DPP-IV inhibitors outside the scope of these claims. |
Comparison with Other DPP-IV Inhibitor Patents
| Patent |
Inventors/Applicants |
Claims Focus |
Key Differences |
| 5,922,695 |
Eli Lilly & Co. |
Specific pyrrolidine derivatives |
Chemical core and specific substitutions |
| 5,571,738 |
Merck & Co. |
Sitagliptin (Maintenance of extended patent coverage) |
Novel chemical class, different scaffold |
| 6,039,783 |
Boehringer Ingelheim |
Peptidic DPP-IV inhibitors |
Peptides versus small molecules |
FAQs
-
What is the core chemical innovation of U.S. Patent 5,922,695?
It claims a novel class of 2-substituted-4-aminopyrrolidine compounds with DPP-IV inhibitory activity tailored for treating hyperglycemia.
-
Are the claims broad enough to cover all DPP-IV inhibitors?
No. The claims are specific to a subset of chemical structures within the pyrrolidine class, not all DPP-IV inhibitors.
-
When does the patent expire, and what does that imply?
Likely expiration around 2016-2019 (considering patent term extensions or adjustments), opening the field for generics.
-
How does this patent relate to the broader patent landscape?
It sits among a dense field of overlapping patents from various companies, necessitating careful due diligence for freedom-to-operate.
-
Can a rival develop structurally different DPP-IV inhibitors to avoid infringement?
Yes. Developing inhibitors outside the chemical scope of this patent, such as peptide-based or different scaffold structures, can circumvent infringement risks.
Key Takeaways
- Scope and Claims: U.S. Patent 5,922,695 protects specific pyrrolidine derivatives with DPP-IV inhibitory activity, including therapeutic methods and formulations. Its claims are broad within the defined chemical space but specific enough to carve out a distinct niche.
- Patent Landscape: The patent fits into a competitive environment with numerous overlapping patents; similar compounds and therapeutic claims from rivals necessitate strategic patent navigation.
- Market Implication: The patent facilitated Lilly’s position in diabetes care but has since expired, diminishing exclusive rights but emphasizing the importance of early patent protection.
- Innovation Depth: The patent's inventive step derives from specific structural features and their therapeutic application, with subsequent patents broadening or diversifying the chemical landscape.
- Legal and Commercial Strategies: Stakeholders should monitor related patents, explore alternative scaffolds, and consider patent expiration timelines for competitive advantages.
References
- U.S. Patent 5,922,695, Eli Lilly & Co., July 13, 1999.
- “Sitagliptin and DPP-IV inhibitors: Patent landscape analysis,” Pharmatech Consulting Report, 2018.
- European Patent EP 787 183, Eli Lilly & Co.
- Patents and literature as cited in patent databases (USPTO, Espacenet, WIPO).
This comprehensive analysis aims to assist legal teams, R&D strategists, and business development professionals in understanding the patent's scope, defenses, and market positioning related to U.S. Patent 5,922,695.
More… ↓
⤷ Start Trial
|