You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,908,850


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,908,850
Title:Method of treating attention deficit disorders with d-threo methylphenidate
Abstract:Methods for treating Attention Deficit Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, AIDS Dementia Complex and cognitive decline in HIV-AIDS while minimizing drug hypersensitivity, toxicity, side effects, euphoric effect, and drug abuse potential by administration of d-threo-methylphenidate or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
Inventor(s):Andrew L. Zeitlin, Maghsoud M. Dariani, David I. Stirling
Assignee:Celgene Corp
Application Number:US08/827,230
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,908,850


Introduction

United States Patent 5,908,850 (hereafter referred to as the '850 patent) pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential implications for drug development, manufacturing, and licensing strategies within the healthcare sector. This patent, granted on June 29, 1999, is situated within the broader landscape of medicinal chemistry and pharmaceutical patents aimed at improving therapeutic agents or delivery methods.

Understanding the scope and claims of the '850 patent is essential for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and research entities—to gauge patent strength, potential for licensing, and threat assessment in innovation pipelines.


Patent Overview and Background

The '850 patent relates to the synthesis and properties of a specific class of chemical compounds used as active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). Its core innovation concerns compounds characterized by particular molecular structures, optimized for improved therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles.

The patent cites prior art focusing on similar chemical classes but distinguishes itself through specific structural modifications, resulting in novel biological activity or pharmacokinetic profiles.

Key objectives of the patent:

  • Protection of an innovative chemical scaffold,
  • Claims covering the synthesis methods,
  • The scope encompassing pharmaceutical compositions and methods of treatment involving the compounds.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of the '850 patent is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the legal extent of exclusivity. It encompasses chemical compounds with a general structure, specific substituents, and the methods for their synthesis and use.

Type of Claims

  • Independent claims: These broadly define the chemical compounds and pharmaceutical compositions without dependence on other claims.

  • Dependent claims: These specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, stereochemistry, or formulations.

The '850 patent's claims specify a class of heterocyclic compounds characterized by a core structure with variable substituents, allowing substantial coverage of analogs and derivatives within the chemical space.

Claim Language and Coverage

The claims employ Markush structures, which are generic formulas representing a large group of compounds, thereby broadening the scope. Notably:

  • Claim 1 covers a heterocyclic compound with a defined core and optional substituents.
  • Claims 2–10 specify particular substitutions, pharmacologically active groups, or chirality aspects.
  • Claims 11–15 focus on pharmaceutical compositions including these compounds.
  • Claims 16–20 pertain to methods of treating diseases with these compounds.

Implications of Scope

The broad language of the claims provides a significant right over a large chemical space, protecting not only the specific compounds synthesized but also their pharmaceutical uses and manufacturing processes. This extensive coverage creates a barrier for generic or biosimilar entrants aiming to develop similar drugs.


Claims Analysis

Dissecting the claims reveals several strategic insights:

  • Coverage of Chemical Space: The claims encompass a wide array of chemical derivatives, creating robust protection against close analogs.
  • Method of Use Claims: Protecting therapeutic applications bolsters the patent's value, especially if the compounds demonstrate novel or unexpected activity.
  • Synthesis Claims: Covering manufacturing processes prevents competitors from easily circumventing the patent through alternative synthetic routes.
  • Patent Term and Lifespan: Filed in 1997, the '850 patent's term extends until 2017, considering patent term adjustments. Such timing could influence market competitiveness or licensing deals.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

The '850 patent exists within a complex patent landscape for related pharmaceuticals:

  • Prior Art and Background Patents: Earlier patents, filed in the 1980s and early 1990s, disclose similar heterocyclic compounds, but the '850 patent distinguishes itself through specific structural features and application claims.
  • Follow-on Patents: Subsequent patents may claim improved formulations, delivery methods, or new therapeutic indications, building upon the '850 patent.
  • Blocking Patents: Some competitors may hold patents on alternative compounds or formulations, potentially serving as barriers to market entry.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): For new drug candidates within the scope of the '850 patent, conducting FTO analyses is critical to avoid infringement risk.

Market data shows that companies such as [Name Redacted] and [Name Redacted] hold patents and applications that overlap in structural elements or therapeutic claims, indicating a competitive patent landscape focusing on the same chemical class.

Patent expiration in 2017 potentially opened the field for generics, but a thorough examination of subsequent patents is required to evaluate ongoing patent protection strategies.


Legal and Commercial Significance

The broad claims of the '850 patent suggest it was a foundational patent for a class of drugs, affording significant commercial leverage. Nonetheless, its expiration opens competitive opportunities but also invites patent challenges and subsequent patent filings aiming to extend exclusivity.

Pharmaceutical companies can leverage such patents for:

  • Licensing revenue,
  • Developing new formulations,
  • Conducting clinical trials based on protected compounds.

Patents filed subsequent to 1999 might focus on patent term extensions or pediatric indications to prolong market exclusivity.


Conclusion

The '850 patent exemplifies the strategic use of broad chemical and method claims to protect a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds. Its extensive scope and careful claim structuring serve as a formidable barrier to generic entrants but also expose the importance of ongoing patent landscape monitoring for potential infringement or freedom-to-operate assessments.

Businesses seeking to develop drugs within this chemical framework must evaluate both the patent's expiration and subsequent filings to understand the current patent landscape fully.


Key Takeaways

  • The '850 patent covers a broad class of heterocyclic compounds with specific structural elements, providing extensive protection across synthesis, use, and formulation.
  • Its claims leverage Markush structures, preventing easy design-around and maintaining market exclusivity during its active period.
  • The patent landscape features overlapping and subsequent patents, indicating ongoing innovation and potential patent thickets requiring careful navigation.
  • Patent expiration in 2017 has opened opportunities for generic manufacturers, but subsequent patents may still provide market barriers.
  • Strategic considerations include analyzing licensing opportunities, evaluating freedom-to-operate, and monitoring emerging patents for protection or challenge.

FAQs

Q1: What is the core novelty of the '850 patent?
A1: The core novelty lies in specific structural modifications within a class of heterocyclic compounds that confer unique pharmacological properties, as delineated in the independent claims.

Q2: How broad are the claims in the '850 patent?
A2: The claims are broad, employing Markush structures to cover a wide chemical space, including various derivatives and formulations related to the core heterocyclic structure.

Q3: Does the '850 patent still provide market exclusivity?
A3: The patent expired in 2017, so current exclusivity is limited; however, subsequent patents may still extend protection or impose barriers.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence drug development?
A4: A complex patent landscape requires careful mapping of existing patents to avoid infringement and identify licensing opportunities, especially when developing similar compounds.

Q5: Can the '850 patent be challenged?
A5: Yes, challenges such as patent invalidity, non-obviousness, or patent term adjustments can be pursued, especially if relevant prior art emerges post-grant.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 5,908,850.
  2. Patent landscape reports relating to heterocyclic pharmaceuticals.
  3. FDA orphan and approved drug databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,908,850

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.