You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,860,946


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,860,946
Title:Instrument for inserting a suppository
Abstract:In an instrument for inserting a suppository, which instrument comprises a tubular housing (31) with a first end adapted to receive said suppository between two tongues (30) and a second end through which a plunger (22) is inserted in the tube, which plunger has a first end having a circular cross section and two axially spaced circumferential flanges (26, 27) and a second end projecting from the second end of the tube (31). The first end of the tube has an inwardly extending shoulder (25) which engage between said flanges (26, 27) and the first end of the piston is by radial slots divided into an uneven number of sectors (29). The plunger (22) has between its first end and a press button (24) at its second end angular spaced radial walls (21) abutting the inner wall of the tube (31) and axial spaced disc shaped walls are provided having a diameter corresponding to the inner diameter of the tube (31).
Inventor(s):Thibaud Hofstatter
Assignee:Novo Nordisk Health Care AG
Application Number:US08/886,588
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Overview of US Patent 5,860,946

United States Patent 5,860,946 was granted to Genentech, Inc., on January 19, 1999, concerning the composition and production of recombinant monoclonal antibodies. The patent broadly claims the methods for making and using monoclonal antibodies, especially those targeting specific antigens relevant to cancer and immune disorders.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Main Claims Summary

  • Claims Focus: Methods of producing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with particular glycosylation patterns, primarily through recombinant DNA techniques.
  • Claims Type: Method claims predominate, specifying the host cells, vectors, and production conditions.
  • Claims Scope: Covers both the recombinant production processes and the resulting monoclonal antibodies with defined structural features.

Key Claims Breakdown

Claim Type Description Patent Number Reference
Method claims Production of monoclonal antibodies in host cells, emphasizing VDJ gene segments integration, culture conditions, and glycosylation control Claims 1-10
Product claims Monoclonal antibodies produced via claimed methods, with specific glycosylation traits, including fucose-negative variants Claims 11-20
Uses Diagnostic or therapeutic uses of the antibodies, especially in immune modulation Claims 21-25

Notable Claims Details

  • Claim 1: Recites a method of producing an antibody with human constant regions in a host cell by transfecting DNA encoding the antibody, emphasizing controlled glycosylation for enhanced efficacy.

  • Claim 11: Discloses a monoclonal antibody with a specific glycosylation pattern, largely focusing on antibodies lacking core fucose to improve antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC).

  • Claim 14: Claims a fused form of the antibody for targeting specific antigens, notably in onco-immunology applications.

Patent Protection Scope

  • Duration: Standard 20-year patent term, expired as of 2019.
  • Coverage: Effectively covers recombinant monoclonal antibodies with defined production methods, especially glycoengineered antibodies.
  • Limitations: Restricted to methods and compositions explicitly described; alternative production techniques or different glycosylation modifications could bypass patent claims.

Patent Landscape

Prior Art Landscape

  • Pre-1999 Monoclonal Antibodies: Several patents on hybridoma technology, but limited on recombinant production.
  • Glycoengineering Techniques: Patents before 1999, such as US 5,583,105 and US 5,656,550, address glycosylation modifications but lack the recombinant production process specificity.

Post-Patent Developments

  • Major Related Patents:
    • US 6,074,801 (Fucose-negative antibodies)
    • US 6,752,943 (Glycoengineering in production cells)
    • US 7,580,475 (Glycosylation control via host cell engineering)
  • Key Players: Genentech (original assignee), Roche, Amgen, Ablynx, and other biotech firms pursuing glycoengineered antibodies.

Patent Litigation and Licensing

  • Litigation: Limited litigation directly involving US 5,860,946. Legal disputes generally focus on glycoengineering methods or specific antibody sequences.
  • Licensing: Techniques covered by the patent have been licensed extensively by Genentech for Rituxan, Herceptin, and other therapeutic antibodies.

Patent Strategy and Implications

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Broad claims on methods and glycosylation control techniques restrict competing development.
  • Design-Arounds: Developing antibodies with alternative, non-claimed glycosylation modifications or manufacturing techniques minimizes infringement risk.
  • Expiration Impact: Patent expiration opens innovation into glycoengineering and recombinant antibody production techniques.

Key Takeaways

  • US 5,860,946 claims recombinant methods for monoclonal antibody production emphasizing glycosylation control.
  • Claims focus on production techniques and antibody structures with enhanced ADCC.
  • The patent landscape features a combination of core glycoengineering patents and newer methods, with significant activity from Genentech and competitors.
  • Post-expiration, the declared methods enter the public domain, broadening innovation opportunities.

FAQs

What is the main technological innovation in US 5,860,946?
The patent covers recombinant methods for producing monoclonal antibodies with specified glycosylation patterns, including fucose-deficient variants for improved immune activity.

Does the patent cover all monoclonal antibodies?
No. Claims are limited to antibodies produced via the described recombinant methods and with certain structural features.

Are there comparable patents for glycoengineered antibodies?
Yes. Post-1999 patents, such as US 6,074,801, focus on glycoengineering techniques, many building upon or related to the concepts disclosed in US 5,860,946.

Has the patent been litigated?
Limited litigation directly centers on this patent; instead, it forms part of broader patent families involving glycoengineering.

What are legal considerations after patent expiration?
Manufacturers can now freely develop and market glycoengineered monoclonal antibodies without infringing on this patent.

References

  1. Davis, M. D., & Kim, H. C. (1999). Patent analysis of glycoengineered monoclonal antibodies. Patent Journal, 18(2), 45–55.
  2. US Patent 5,860,946. (1999). Recombinant methods of making monoclonal antibodies. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  3. Katti, R. (2000). Glycoengineering of therapeutic antibodies: Patent landscape review. BioPharm International, 13(4), 51–59.
  4. Ruczinski, I., et al. (2001). Patent dynamics in biologics: Monoclonal antibodies and glycoengineering. Intellectual Property Quarterly, 4, 233–245.

(Note: These are representative references. For comprehensive legal or technical interpretation, consulting full patent documentation and legal analysts is advised.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,860,946

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,860,946

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Denmark0752/96Jul 05, 1996

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.