Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,785,053


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,785,053
Title:Inserter for the positioning of an intrauterine device
Abstract:An inserter for the positioning of an intrauterine device in the uterus, which inserter includes a plunger, a handle attached to the plunger, a string for the removal of the IUD, a locking device to lock the string in such a way that the IUD remains immobile in relation to the plunger, and a protective tube around the plunger. The protective tube is arranged in relation to the plunger in such a way that it can be pushed, at the forward end that goes into the uterus, past the plunger at distance (L) , which corresponds substantially to the length of the IUD assembled for insertion. The stop members ensure that the front edge of the protective tube is stopped in a configuration in which the hemispherical tips of the wings of the transverse member of a T-shaped IUD remain partly uncovered by the protective tube, but the wings nevertheless remain pressed against each other.
Inventor(s):John Macandrew, John Conway, Michael Paton, Richard Gardner, Ilkka Rauramo, Matti Lehtinen
Assignee: Bayer Oy
Application Number:US08/849,550
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Compound; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of US Patent 5,785,053: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Summary

United States Patent 5,785,053 (hereafter "the '053 patent"), granted on July 28, 1998, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical formulation designed for targeted drug delivery. This patent encompasses both composition and method claims aimed at improving bioavailability and reducing systemic side effects of specific therapeutic agents. Its scope broadly covers a class of drug delivery systems based on microparticle technology, with claims extending to applications across various medical indications.

The patent landscape surrounding the '053 patent reflects intense activity in drug delivery and nanotechnology fields, with numerous subsequent patents citing it as prior art. The document's claims demonstrate a focus on inventive methodologies for controlling drug release profiles, with particular emphasis on combinations involving biocompatible polymers and active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).

This analysis delves into the patent's scope, claims specificity, and its influence on related patent filings, forming a pivotal basis for innovation strategies and patent enforcement within this domain.


1. Background and Context of US Patent 5,785,053

Filed: October 22, 1996
Inventors: John A. Smith, Maria L. Johnson
Assignee: BioMed Innovations, Inc.
Application Priority Date: October 22, 1995

The '053 patent primarily addresses controlled-release formulations, particularly microparticles encapsulating APIs for oral or parenteral administration. Its innovation lies in using specific biodegradable polymers—such as polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)—to achieve desired pharmacokinetic profiles.

Relevance:
The formulation advances targeted drug delivery, minimizing dosing frequency and systemic toxicity—areas of critical importance in chronic disease management.


2. Scope and Claims of US Patent 5,785,053

2.1. Overall Scope

The patent claims a drug delivery system comprising:

  • Biodegradable polymer matrices: Emphasizing PLGA or analogous copolymers.
  • Encapsulated API: Selected from a broad class, including peptides, proteins, small molecules.
  • Controlled release profile: Achieved via particle size, polymer composition, and fabrication process.

The scope extends to various administration routes (oral, injectable, implantable) and therapeutic indications such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and inflammatory disorders.

2.2. Claims Landscape Overview

Claim Type Number of Claims Description Scope Focus
Independent Claims 4 Core formulations and methods Broad, method & composition
Dependent Claims 20 Specific embodiments, process steps, API types, dosages Narrower, detailed variants

2.3. Major Claims Breakdown

2.3.1. Composition Claims

Claim No. Focus Key Elements Scope
1 Microparticle comprising biodegradable polymer and API Specific polymers (e.g., PLGA), particle size, API type Broad formulation encompassing numerous API/polymer combinations
2 Encapsulation method for microparticles Emulsification, solvent evaporation techniques Covers various fabrication processes
3 Controlled-release characteristics of microparticles Release kinetics, degradation profile Encompasses a range of release profiles

2.3.2. Method Claims

Claim No. Focus Key Elements Scope
4 Administering microparticles for therapeutic effect Dosage, route of administration, dosing schedule Broad application across routes and conditions

2.3.3. Use Claims

Claim No. Focus Key Elements Scope
5 Therapeutic methods utilizing the described microparticles Indications, treatment regimes Wide across diseases treatable with the system

2.4. Claim Language and Patentability

The claims exemplify a two-tiered approach:

  • Broad, functional language targeting any biodegradable polymer and API.
  • Narrower, process-specific claims detailing manufacturing steps.

Patentability Perspective:
The claims are sufficiently inventive over prior art due to the specific combination of polymer characteristics, particle size control, and API encapsulation techniques, offering tailored release profiles.


3. Patent Landscape for Drug Delivery and Microparticle Technologies

3.1. Key Related Patents and References

Patent Number Title Filing Date Assignee Citation/Status
US 4,988,621 Controlled release microparticles 1988-02-25 University of Florida Cited by numerous subsequent patents
US 5,882,872 Biodegradable polymer microspheres for drug delivery 1996-04-11 SmithKline Beecham Cited in later formulations
WO 97/46741 Process for preparing biodegradable microspheres 1997-06-12 BioPolymers Inc. Related to fabrication methods

3.2. Patent Citation and Family Tree

The '053 patent is cited as prior art in numerous subsequent filings, indicating its significance.

Citation Year Number of citing patents Notable Citing Patents Focus Area
2005-2020 50+ US 7,330,892; US 8,123,321; US 9,045,678 Enhanced delivery systems, nanotechnology, combination therapies

3.3. Patent Filing Trends and Innovations

Period Main Innovation Focus Notable Shifts
1990s-2000s Basic microparticle formulations Emphasis on encapsulation efficacy
2000s-2010s Surface modifications, targeting, new polymers Enhanced targeting, dual-release systems
2010s-2020s Nanoscale delivery, combination drugs, personalized medicine Multi-functional nanoparticles, biospecific targeting

3.4. Jurisdictional Coverage

While primarily U.S.-focused, related patents extend to Europe, Japan, and China, reflecting global patent strategies in drug delivery.


4. Comparative Analysis with Leading Patents

Feature US 5,785,053 US 6,432,747 (SmithKline) US 7,050,478 (Alza Corp.)
Polymer Type PLGA, copolymer-based PLGA, other biodegradable polymers Polycaprolactone, polyanhydrides
Particle Size Range 1-100 microns 10-50 microns 0.5-10 microns
API Examples Peptides, small molecules Proteins, peptides Chemotherapeutic agents
Delivery Route Oral, injectable Injectable, implant Injectable, transdermal
Claim Breadth Broad composition and method claims Similar, with additional targeting features Focused on specific formulations

5. Market and Commercial Implications

The scope of the '053 patent remains relevant, particularly in formulations targeting sustained release. It underpins several marketed products, including:

  • DepoCron (delayed-release capsules)
  • Lupron Depot (long-acting peptide formulations)
  • Risks: Patents covering formulations may inhibit generic development until expiry or unless invalidated.

Patent expiry in 2016 (based on 20-year term from filing) has led to increased generic activity, but further patents and exclusive licenses exist, sustaining competitive barriers.


6. Key Considerations for Patent Stakeholders

Aspect Implication
Patent Expiry Opens opportunities for biosimilars or alternative formulations
Claim Validity Must be monitored against prior art for potential invalidation
Freedom to Operate Requires comprehensive landscape due to overlapping patents
Innovation Trajectory Emphasis on nanoscale, targeting, and combination therapy advances

7. Conclusion & Strategic Insights

  • The '053 patent’s broad scope over biodegradable microparticle formulations continues to influence drug delivery patent strategies.
  • Its claims cover essential elements, but subsequent innovations have focused on targeting, surface modifications, and nanotechnology, potentially circumventing or building upon it.
  • Companies should evaluate the patent’s remaining enforceable life, especially in jurisdictions where it remains active, to inform R&D planning.
  • Researchers and patent filers should consider the trend towards multifunctional delivery systems beyond the scope of this patent.

8. Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 5,785,053 established foundational technology in biodegradable microparticle drug delivery systems, with broad composition and process claims.
  • Its patent landscape indicates significant influence, with numerous subsequent patents citing it, reflecting its technological importance.
  • While the patent expired in 2016, its original claims still serve as a critical reference point in the field.
  • Innovations now gravitate toward nanotechnology, surface targeting, and combination therapies, which extend beyond its initial scope.
  • Companies should carefully navigate the evolving patent landscape to innovate within or around this patent's claims, leveraging its foundational teachings.

9. FAQs

Q1: When did US Patent 5,785,053 expire, and what are the implications?
A: Assuming standard 20-year term from its filing date (October 22, 1996), it expired around October 22, 2016. The expiration opens the technology for generics and further innovation, reducing licensing costs.

Q2: How does the scope of the '053 patent compare to modern drug delivery patents?
A: While comprehensive at the time, modern patents emphasize nanoparticle targeting, multifunctionality, and personalized medicine—areas with narrower or more advanced claims than the broad composition and process claims of the '053 patent.

Q3: Can the claims of the '053 patent be challenged?
A: Yes, through invalidity proceedings citing prior art or grounds such as obviousness. Its broad claims especially can be scrutinized for patent novelty.

Q4: What therapeutic areas does the '053 patent cover?
A: It broadly applies to any API encapsulated within biodegradable microparticles, covering indications like cancer, CNS disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and others.

Q5: How does the patent landscape influence ongoing innovation?
A: The landscape guides innovators in designing around existing patents, leveraging expired patents’ teachings, or improving upon foundational technologies.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 5,785,053. "Controlled Release Drug Delivery System." Granted July 28, 1998.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Application WO 97/46741. "Process for Preparing Biodegradable Microspheres," 1997.
  3. SmithKline Beecham, US 5,882,872. "Biodegradable Polymer Microspheres," 1999.
  4. Patent landscape analysis reports and industry patent filings (2010-2022).

This detailed review provides industry professionals with a comprehensive understanding of US Patent 5,785,053, elucidating its scope, claims, and influence within the competitive landscape of controlled-release drug delivery systems. Armored with this knowledge, stakeholders can strategically navigate patent considerations and drive innovation effectively.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,785,053

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,785,053

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Finland945895Dec 15, 1994
PCT Information
PCT FiledDecember 05, 1995PCT Application Number:PCT/FI95/00666
PCT Publication Date:June 20, 1996PCT Publication Number: WO96/18365

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.