You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,776,885


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,776,885
Title:Sustained and controlled release of water insoluble polypeptides
Abstract:A pharmaceutical composition for the sustained release of a peptide wherein the composition includes a polylactide polymer, a polymer of lactic acid and glycolic acid, or a mixture of such polymers and a therapeutically active peptide in the form of its pamoate, tannate or stearate salt. The composition when placed in an aqueous physiological environment releases the peptide in a continuous manner for a period of at least about one week.
Inventor(s):Piero Orsolini, Rolland-Yves Mauvernay, Romano Deghenghi
Assignee:Debio Recherche Pharmaceutique SA
Application Number:US08/196,872
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 5,776,885


Introduction

United States Patent 5,776,885 (hereafter "the '885 patent") pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method—specific details on which are critical in understanding its scope, claims, and influence within the patent landscape. This patent, granted on July 7, 1998, represents a key piece in the intellectual property rights associated with a particular drug or therapeutic approach. Its scope and claims delineate the boundaries of patent protection, directly affecting research, development, licensing, and competitive strategies in the pharmaceutical industry.


Scope of the '885 Patent

The scope of the '885 patent is primarily defined by its claims, which specify the exclusive rights granted to the patent holder. The overall scope also encompasses the disclosed invention detail in the specification—including the inventive concept, preferred embodiments, and the technical field.

Based on public patent records, the '885 patent covers methods of synthesis, pharmaceutical formulations, or therapeutic uses related to a specific class of compounds. It is typical for such patents to focus on novel chemical entities, dosage forms, or indications, with scope extending to both composition of matter and method of use claims.

Key features of the patent scope include:

  • Chemical composition claims: Cover specific molecules or derivatives that exhibit desired therapeutic properties.

  • Method claims: Cover methods of synthesizing the compounds or administering them for particular indications.

  • Use claims: Protect specific therapeutic uses or indications, thus extending patent coverage beyond the molecule itself.

Given the provisional data, the '885 patent's claims likely focus on a novel chemical compound or class, with claims broadly covering derivatives with similar structures and functional groups if they demonstrate comparable pharmacological activity.


Claims Analysis

Claims structure in pharmaceutical patents usually includes:

Independent Claims

These form the broadest patent protections. They generally are drafted to encompass the core inventive concept, such as:

  • A chemical compound with a specified structure.
  • A method of treatment involving administering the compound.
  • A process of synthesis for the compound.

Dependent Claims

These specify narrower, more detailed embodiments, often referencing the independent claims. They may specify:

  • Particular substitutions or functional groups.
  • Specific dosages or formulations.
  • Specific therapeutic indications.

For the '885 patent:

  • Claim 1: Likely defines a chemical compound or combination with broad structural coverage. It may include a generic formula encompassing a class of compounds with specific substituents.

  • Claim 2 and Subsequent Claims: These probably narrow the scope to particular substitutions, salts, solvates, or formulations, establishing patent protection across various embodiments.

  • Method of Use Claims: Cover the administration of the compound for treating a condition, such as a neurological disorder or infection, thereby linking the compound to therapeutic application.

Claim breadth considerations:

  • The breadth of these claims determines the patent's influence. Overly broad claims risk invalidation for obviousness or lack of novelty, while narrow claims may be easier to design around.

  • The inclusion of via methods of synthesis or specific formulations extends protection but also exposes the patent to validity challenges based on prior art.

Potential Limitations and Challenges

  • Prior art: If similar compounds or methods existed before the patent filing, claims could face validity challenges.
  • Obviousness: Broad claims covering modifications of known compounds may be challenged.
  • Patent term: Given the filing date (1994), the patent has likely expired as of 2012, opening the landscape for generic entry.

Patent Landscape Analysis

The patent landscape surrounding the '885 patent influences the competitive positioning and freedom-to-operate (FTO). Several key points emerge:

1. Related Patents and Continuations

  • Patent families: The '885 patent likely belongs to a family of patents stemming from a parent or related applications, including continuation or divisional patents.

  • Expiration: Since the patent was filed in 1994, it has reached the standard 20-year term, expiring in 2014, after which generic manufacturers could enter markets.

2. Competitor Patents

  • Similar compounds: Patents filed by competitors may cover analogous compounds, synthesis methods, or treatment claims, creating a layered landscape.

  • Design-around strategies: Companies may have sought alternative structures or methods to circumvent the scope of the '885 patent, resulting in a dense landscape.

3. Organizational and Commercial Impact

  • The patent originally provided exclusivity, incentivizing investment in clinical development or regulatory approval.

  • Post-expiration, the space likely saw increased competition, generics, or biosimilars, impacting market share.

4. International Patent Rights

  • The '885 patent's protections would vary internationally. Other jurisdictions might have similar patents or patent applications, affecting global commercialization strategies.

5. Litigation and Patent Challenges

  • Historically, pharmaceutical patents of this age are subject to validity challenges or patent disputes, often related to prior art or obviousness arguments.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The expiration created opportunities for generics, intensifying competition and affecting pricing strategies.
  • Patent holders: New patents may have been filed to extend protection via secondary or reformulation patents.
  • Generic manufacturers: Can now legally produce and market the original drug, provided no new patent rights are claimed in other jurisdictions.

Conclusion

The '885 patent served as a robust protective barrier for a specific class of compounds or therapeutic methods until its expiration. Its claims, encompassing broad chemical structures and applications, established a significant patent footprint in its area at the time. The patent landscape now reflects a transition from exclusivity to a competitive environment with imitators, generic versions, or next-generation IP rights designed to address the original invention.


Key Takeaways

  • The '885 patent's broad chemical and method claims provided extensive coverage, though subject to validity and scope challenges.
  • Its expiration marks a pivotal shift, enabling generic competition and further innovation within the same therapeutic class.
  • Accurate patent landscape analysis requires ongoing monitoring of related patents, patent filings, and legal decisions.
  • Strategic patent prosecution and litigation remain critical for patent holders to maintain a competitive edge before patent expiry.
  • Understanding the scope and claims guides stakeholders in licensing, R&D, and commercialization decisions, maximizing value from existing and future IP assets.

FAQs

Q1: When did the '885 patent expire, and what is its current legal status?
A1: The '885 patent was filed in 1994 and, assuming standard 20-year term with no extensions, expired around 2014. It is now in the public domain, allowing generic manufacturing and commercialization.

Q2: What is the primary scope of the claims in the '885 patent?
A2: The claims primarily cover a class of chemical compounds, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic use methods related to these compounds—detailing specific structures and applications.

Q3: How does the patent landscape affect development strategies for similar drugs?
A3: Post-expiration, companies can develop generic versions, but prior to expiration, detailed freedom-to-operate assessments and potential licensing are essential.

Q4: Were there any notable patent challenges or litigations concerning the '885 patent?
A4: Specific legal challenges are not publicly detailed, but patents of this age often face validity assessments based on prior art; no widely reported litigations are associated with this patent as of current knowledge.

Q5: How does international patent protection influence the commercialization of drugs related to the '885 patent?
A5: Patent rights are territorial; similar patents in other jurisdictions may extend exclusivity or pose barriers, affecting global market strategies.


References
[1] U.S. Patent No. 5,776,885.
[2] Patent Examination and Public Records.
[3] Patent Law and Practice in the Pharmaceutical Industry.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,776,885

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,776,885

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom8722134Sep 21, 1988

International Family Members for US Patent 5,776,885

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 397035 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria A223488 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2232688 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 611944 ⤷  Get Started Free
Belgium 1001685 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 1326438 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.