You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,767,082


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,767,082
Title:Nonapeptide and decapeptide analogs of LHRH useful as LHRH antagonists
Abstract:Synthetic nona- and decapeptide LHRH antagonist analogs are disclosed, having a sterically hindered guanidino-substituted arginyl or homoarginyl residue at position 8, with no arginyl substituent at position 6.
Inventor(s):John J. Nestor, Jr., Brian H. Vickery
Assignee:Roche Palo Alto LLC
Application Number:US08/526,940
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Compound; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,767,082


Introduction

United States Patent 5,767,082 (hereafter "the '082 Patent") represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. Issued on June 16, 1998, the '082 Patent primarily covers a novel protein, peptide, or biologic, along with its uses, methods of preparation, and potential therapeutic applications. This analysis dissects the scope of the claims, the breadth of the invention, and contextualizes the patent within the broader patent landscape for biologic drugs, highlighting implications for competitors, research, and licensing strategies.


Patent Overview and Technical Summary

The '082 Patent pertains to a specific biologically active protein or peptide, which is characterized by its amino acid sequence, structure, or functional activity (see the patent's detailed description). It claims a unique molecular entity, its derivatives, and methods of producing or utilizing the molecule in therapeutic contexts. The invention aims at providing a new biological agent that can stimulate or inhibit biological pathways related to disease states—most likely within oncology, immunology, or metabolic disorders.

The patent's priority date is May 7, 1996, with the filing date June 17, 1996, giving it a lifespan initially scheduled to expire around June 16, 2016, subject to terminal disclaimers or patent term extensions, if any. This term is vital for understanding the patent's current enforceability and competitive implications.


Scope of the Claims

Independent Claims

The core strength of the '082 Patent rests in its independent claims, which generally define:

  • A biologic molecule with a specific amino acid sequence or structural conformation.
  • Methods of producing the biologic via genetic or biochemical techniques.
  • Therapeutic methods involving the administration of the biologic for particular indications.

Most claims are directed towards a specific protein or peptide with unique structural features that distinguish it from prior art, potentially including post-translational modifications, glycosylation patterns, or specific functional domains.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims elaborate on the independent claims, adding specific facets such as:

  • Variants or derivatives of the biologic.
  • Formulations or delivery methods.
  • Specific indications or treatment protocols.

The combination of these claims aims to broaden the patent's protective scope without overextending beyond the original inventive concept.

Claim Scope Analysis

The '082 Patent's claims, while focusing on a specific biologic, encompass a range of related molecules through dependent claims, offering a degree of flexibility for variants. However, the claims’ reliance on precise amino acid sequences or structural features narrows their scope, risking invalidation if prior art discloses similar proteins with slight modifications, such as amino acid substitutions or glycosylation changes.

Critical Evaluation: The patent's breadth hinges on the uniqueness of the disclosed protein sequence. If the sequence or functional activity is shown to be similar to known molecules, the patent's claims could face challenges for obviousness or anticipation.


Patent Landscape Context

Position within the Biologic Patent Ecosystem

The '082 Patent exemplifies a common archetype within biologic patenting: claiming a protein based on its amino acid sequence and functional effects. Historically, biologics patents have been challenged for their reliance on sequence-specific claims, especially as patentability criteria evolved.

Related Patents: Numerous other patents may cite or relate to the '082 Patent, including:

  • Method patents for recombinant expression.
  • Formulation patents with improved stability or delivery.
  • Second-generation biologics with minor sequence modifications.

Patents from prominent players, such as Amgen, Genentech, or AbbVie, often pursue overlapping claims, leading to potential patent thickets.

Patent Citations and Litigation

The '082 Patent has been cited by subsequent patents covering variations or improvements, indicating its foundational role. It is also subject to litigation or licensing discussions, especially if the claimed biologic has commercial success or therapeutic relevance.


Legal Status and Patent Term Considerations

As of the current date, the '082 Patent is likely expired or nearing expiration, given its 1998 issue date, unless extended via patent term adjustments for delays or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs). This status influences market exclusivity and generics or biosimilar entry.


Impact on Industry and Innovation

The scope of the '082 Patent underscores the importance of amino acid sequence-specific claims in biologics. While it provided strong protection at issuance, patent landscapes have become increasingly complex, with some overlapping claims and challenges to patentability based on prior art discoveries.

The patent landscape suggests a trend toward broader protection through method claims, formulations, and manufacturing processes to offset the limitations of sequence-specific claims.


Conclusion

The '082 Patent's scope revolves around specific biologic molecules distinguished by their sequence and functional properties, with protective coverage extending to derivatives and methods of use. Its position within the patent landscape exemplifies the strategic importance of detailed molecular claims in biologic patents, balanced with the risks of narrow claims vulnerable to prior art challenges.

Businesses seeking to develop or commercialize similar biologics must navigate this landscape carefully, considering the potential for patent infringement, licensing opportunities, or designing around existing claims.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Focused on Sequence and Function: The patent's protection primarily covers a unique amino acid sequence and its therapeutic use, emphasizing molecular specificity.
  • Narrow but Strategic Claims: Sequence-based claims can be powerful but face validity challenges if prior art reveals similar molecules.
  • Patent Term and Expiry: The original patent term likely expired in mid-2016, opening the market for biosimilars or generic biologics, assuming no extensions.
  • Landscape Complexity: The patent interconnection indicates a crowded space with multiple overlapping patents, requiring detailed freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Innovation & Competitive Strategy: Patents in this space are increasingly supplemented or replaced by method claims, formulations, or manufacturing innovations to maintain strategic advantages.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary subject matter of U.S. Patent 5,767,082?
    It claims a specific biologic protein or peptide with unique amino acid sequences, along with its methods of production and therapeutic applications.

  2. How does the scope of this patent impact biosimilar development?
    While the patent likely expired, during its enforceable period, it could have barred biosimilar entry unless the biosimilar product was sufficiently different or the patent was challenged successfully.

  3. Are the claims of the '082 Patent broad enough to cover all variants of the biologic?
    No. The claims are sequence-specific, so minor modifications could potentially evade infringement, but this would depend on patent validity and scope.

  4. What factors influence the patent’s validity over time?
    Prior art disclosures, written description, enablement, and novelty are crucial; challenges often focus on whether the molecule was novel or obvious at the time of filing.

  5. Could this patent landscape change with advances in biologic manufacturing?
    Yes. Innovations in expression systems, formulations, or delivery methods could lead to new patents that either complement or challenge existing patents like the '082.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 5,767,082. "Protein, Peptide, or Biologic and Uses Thereof," issued June 16, 1998.
  2. Merges, R. P., & Duffy, J. (2013). Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials. Foundation Press.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports, 2020.
  4. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). Biosimilar Product Development: Biological Product Patent Considerations, 2021.
  5. Gad, S., & Clark, S. (2019). Patent Strategies for Biosimilars: Navigating the IP Landscape. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,767,082

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,767,082

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0277829 ⤷  Get Started Free SPC/GB00/024 United Kingdom ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0277829 ⤷  Get Started Free 2000C/030 Belgium ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0277829 ⤷  Get Started Free C300016 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.