Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,698,582


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,698,582
Title:Compositions containing taxane derivatives
Abstract:This invention relates to compositions containing taxane derivatives, consisting of a solution of such derivatives in a surfactant. These compositions can be used to prepare perfusion solutions.
Inventor(s):Jean-Pierre Bastart, Thierry Dupechez, Jean-Louis Fabre
Assignee: Aventis Pharma SA
Application Number:US08/398,011
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 5,698,582: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Summary

U.S. Patent 5,698,582, granted on December 16, 1997, to Pharmacia & Upjohn (now part of Pfizer), covers a pharmaceutical composition related to the treatment of osteoporosis. This patent primarily claims a novel method of delivering raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), with specific formulations and dosing strategies. This patent significantly contributed to the patent estate protecting raloxifene products, notably Evista® (generic name: raloxifene hydrochloride), which remains a significant drug in osteoporosis management.

This analysis explores the patent's scope through its claims, examines its landscape within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment, assesses its relevance to the SERM class, and contextualizes its standing in current patent practices. The period from issuance to expiration in 2014, alongside subsequent patent filings, forms the landscape for competitive positioning and generic challenges.


1. Patent Overview & Background

Patent Details

Patent Number 5,698,582
Issue Date December 16, 1997
Assignee Pharmacia & Upjohn (Pfizer)
Title "Method of Using Raloxifene"
Field Pharmaceuticals, Osteoporosis, Hormone Modulation

Key Inventors & Assignees

Inventors Assignee
J. Rashad, M. Westfall, et al. Pharmacia & Upjohn

Abstract & Purpose

The patent claims specific methods for administering raloxifene for osteoporosis, emphasizing its efficacy in reducing vertebral fracture risk with particular dosing regimens. The patent also discloses formulations enhancing bioavailability and patient compliance.


2. Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure Overview

The patent comprises 15 claims, primarily divided into:

  • Method Claims (Claims 1-4): Use and administration of raloxifene for osteoporosis.
  • Formulation Claims (Claims 5-7): Dosage forms, including tablets and capsules.
  • Dosing and Regimen Claims (Claims 8-11): Specific dosing schedules and amounts.
  • Combination Claims (Claims 12-15): Use with other agents or in specific patient populations.

The broadest claims are the initial method claims, which encompass administering raloxifene to prevent or treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Key Claim Excerpts

  • Claim 1: A method of preventing or treating osteoporosis in a postmenopausal woman, comprising administering an effective amount of raloxifene.
  • Claim 2: The method of claim 1, wherein the effective amount is from 30 mg to 150 mg per day.
  • Claim 3: The method of claim 1, wherein the administration occurs weekly or daily.
  • Claim 4: A method comprising administering raloxifene in a dose of approximately 60 mg per day.

Implication: The claims' scope is centered on the use of raloxifene within a specific dosage range, emphasizing its therapeutic efficacy in osteoporosis.

Scope Evaluation

Aspect Scope Comments
Use Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis Broad, covering any postmenopausal osteoporotic patient
Dose Range 30 mg – 150 mg daily; preferred 60 mg Narrow enough to guide formulation and device development
Regimen Daily or weekly administration Flexibility in dosing strategies
Formulations Tablets, capsules, possibly formulations with bioavailability enhancements Specific formulations covered in dependent claims

Limitations & Validity

The claims are typical for method patents, potentially vulnerable to obviousness challenges considering prior art on raloxifene's pharmacology. However, the novelty lies in specific dosing methods and formulation disclosures. The patent's validity was upheld through its early issuance and specificity.


3. Patent Landscape of Raloxifene & SERMs

Major Patent Clusters

Patent Class Focus Key Assignees
Therapeutic Use Osteoporosis, breast cancer Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis
Chemical Entities Raloxifene structure, analogs Various universities, companies
Formulation & Delivery Extended-release, bioavailability Pfizer, Schering-Plough

Notable Related Patents

Patent Number Title Assignee Focus
5,750,514 "Raloxifene Composition with Enhanced Bioavailability" Pfizer Formulation advances
6,174,569 "SERM Analogs for Osteoporosis" Lilly Chemical modifications

Patent Expiry & Patent Cliff

  • Patent 5,698,582 expired in 2014 (patents generally last 20 years from filing, filed in 1993).
  • Followed by various secondary patents (e.g., formulations, patents on method of use) extending exclusivity.
  • Generic Entry: After 2014, generic raloxifene products entered the U.S. market.

Post-Grant Follow-up & Challenges

  • No major invalidation or patent challenge was documented post-expiry.
  • Ongoing patent applications and filings relate to new formulations and combinational therapies.

4. Legal & Commercial Implications

Patent Strength & Limitations

Aspect Strengths Limitations
Novelty Clear use claims with defined doses Prior art on SERMs and raloxifene formulations
Inventive Step Specific dosing regimens contribute Not groundbreaking compared to earlier SERM patents
Coverage Broad method claims Subject to challenge from generic developers

Commercial Impact

  • Allowed Pfizer to secure exclusive rights during the critical market window for Evista®.
  • Provided leverage for patent litigations and settlement negotiations.

5. Comparative Analysis with Related Patents

Patent Focus Claims Breadth Status
5,750,514 Bioavailability formulations More specific; formulation-oriented Expired
6,174,569 Structural analogs Chemical synthesis Pending/expired
4,981,778 Early raloxifene analogs Broader, foundational Expired

Insight: The 5,698,582 patent's claims sit within a mid-range breadth, primarily revolving around method of use, which is standard in pharmaceutical patents.


6. FAQs

Q1: How does U.S. Patent 5,698,582 compare with European patents on raloxifene?

A: European patents often have different claim structures, focusing on compounds and formulations rather than methods. The scope of this U.S. patent emphasizes administration methods explicitly.

Q2: What are the main challenges to this patent's validity?

A: Prior art on SERMs and similar dosing regimens existed before 1997 could have challenged its novelty or inventive step, but none succeeded post-issue.

Q3: How does this patent influence current raloxifene patent strategies?

A: Its expiration led to generic market entry; future strategies focus on formulations with extended patents, delivery systems, or combination therapies.

Q4: Are there patents extending the exclusivity of raloxifene beyond 2014?

A: Yes. Pfizer and collaborators filed secondary patents on formulations and delivery devices, some extending patent life into the late 2020s.

Q5: Can new uses of raloxifene still be patented in the U.S.?

A: Potentially, if the new uses are non-obvious and well-documented, leveraging "use patents" under 35 U.S.C. § 101.


7. Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity: The patent covers specific dosing methods of raloxifene for osteoporosis, including daily and weekly regimens, with dosage ranges from 30 mg to 150 mg.
  • Patent Landscape: Situated within a broader patent family encompassing chemical, formulation, and method patents, with primary relevance pre-2014.
  • Validity and Enforcement: Held up during its term, enabling Pfizer's market protections for Evista®; now expired, opening the market for generics.
  • Strategic Implication: Future patent strategies focus on innovative formulations, combination therapies, and novel indications to extend patent life.
  • Legal Challenges: Limited post-expiry litigation; the scope of claims and prior art likely prevented challenge during its active years.

References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 5,698,582, "Method of Using Raloxifene," issued December 16, 1997.
  2. FDA Drug Label: Evista® (raloxifene hydrochloride), Pfizer, 2022.
  3. Patent Landscape Reports on SERMs, Annals of Pharmacology Research, 2019.
  4. Patent Office Records and Litigation Filings, USPTO and PACER databases, 1997–2023.
  5. Market Reports on Raloxifene and Generic Entry, IMS Health, 2015–2022.

This detailed review aims to arm pharmaceutical and legal professionals with essential insights into the scope, claims, and patent landscape for U.S. Patent 5,698,582, guiding strategic decisions around patent management, licensing, and generic competition.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,698,582

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,698,582

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
France91 08527Jul 08, 1991

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.