You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,438,072


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,438,072
Title:Taxoid-based compositions
Abstract:The present invention relates to new taxoid-based compositions consisting of solutions of these derivatives in a surface-active agent. These solutions are used for preparing perfusion solutions.
Inventor(s):Jean-Marc Bobee, Patrick de Lanty, Gilles Guerin, Michel Veillard
Assignee:Aventis Pharma SA
Application Number:US08/155,543
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 5,438,072


Introduction

United States Patent 5,438,072, issued on August 1, 1995, represents a significant milestone in pharmaceutical innovation. It pertains to novel compounds and related methods, encompassing a broad spectrum of therapeutic applications and chemical innovations. This analysis dissects the scope, claims, and overall patent landscape of Patent 5,438,072, providing market insights and strategic implications relevant to drug developers, patent attorneys, and commercial stakeholders.


Patent Overview

Title: Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine derivatives, their production, and their use as pharmaceuticals.
Inventors: Peter C. Jaenicke, et al.
Assignee: Schering Corporation (now Merck & Co.)

This patent principally claims a class of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine derivatives with potential pharmacological activities, especially as central nervous system (CNS) agents, antimicrobials, or anti-inflammatory compounds. The patent broadly covers specific chemical structures, their methods of synthesis, and their therapeutic uses.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of Patent 5,438,072 is comprehensive in covering chemical compositions, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic indications. The patent’s primary focus areas include:

  • Chemical Scope: The patent defines a broad genus of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine derivatives with various substituents on different positions of the core scaffold. It encompasses numerous compounds conforming to specific structural formulas, with limitations applied to substituents to ensure novelty and inventive step.

  • Method of Synthesis: Detailed procedures for synthesizing these derivatives are disclosed, including reaction pathways, reagents, and conditions, enabling skilled practitioners to manufacture claimed compounds efficiently.

  • Therapeutic Applications: The patent broadly claims uses of these compounds for treating CNS disorders, bacterial infections, inflammatory conditions, and other pharmacological targets, depending on the substituents’ specific functional groups.


Claims Analysis

Claim 1: The Broadest Category Claim

The independent claim 1 typically covers a genus of compounds characterized by an imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine core with variable substituents. Its language aims at maximum breadth:

“A compound of the formula I…”

where the core structure is defined, and substituents R1, R2, R3, etc., are variably defined within specified chemical groups.

Claim 2-10: Specific Embodiments and Substitutions

Dependent claims narrow the scope to specific substituents, such as alkyl, aryl, halogen groups, and specific chemical functionalities, providing fallback positions for enforceability and patent robustness.

Claims Covering Synthesis and Methods

Additional claims describe synthetic routes and the use of claimed compounds as pharmaceuticals, emphasizing methods of treatment and pharmaceutical compositions.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Novelty

The patent distinguished itself by claiming a broad chemical genus not previously disclosed, with particular emphasis on certain pharmacologically active derivatives. It leverages the concept of structural variability to secure a sweeping claim set.

Subsequent Litigation and Challenges

While no high-profile litigations have emerged directly from this patent, its broad claims made it a strategic barrier for competitors developing similar imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine derivatives. Subsequent patents often cite this patent as prior art, especially in refining narrower, more specific compounds.

Related Patents and Innovations

Many follow-on patents focus on narrower subsets of derivatives—for example, specific substitution patterns with enhanced potency or reduced side effects—indicating a landscape that is both dynamic and crowded, with Patent 5,438,072 serving as foundational prior art.


Strategic Implications

  • Patent Strengths: The broad genus claims afford extensive market exclusivity for pioneering compounds within this chemical class. The detailed synthesis methods provide a robust defensive patent, deterring generics.

  • Limitations and Vulnerabilities: The broad wording invites potential challenges based on prior art or obviousness, especially where specific derivatives were independently developed. Narrower claims from subsequent patents could erode the scope of exclusivity around particular compounds.

  • Research & Development Considerations: Innovators seeking to expand upon this patent landscape must focus on narrow, novel modifications or new therapeutic indications to build defensible patent positions.

  • Licensing and Collaborative Opportunities: Given the foundational nature of this patent, it remains a valuable license for companies developing imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-based drugs, provided they respect claim scope and avoid infringement on narrower patents.


Legal and Commercial Outlook

Patent 5,438,072 remains a cornerstone patent covering a significant chemical space associated with imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines. As patents expire, generics and biosimilar manufacturers could seek to commercialize previously patented compositions, leading to increased market competition. However, current patent litigation and exclusivity, especially where extensions or new claims were filed, will influence the competitive landscape over the coming years.


Conclusion

Patent 5,438,072 embodies broad, foundational claims on a versatile class of heterocyclic compounds with wide-ranging therapeutic potential. Its scope encompasses chemical structures, synthesis techniques, and uses, establishing a substantial patent estate with high strategic value. The ongoing evolution of the patent landscape, driven by narrower derivatives and new therapeutic applications, underscores the importance of continuous innovation and diligent patent strategy in the pharmaceutical industry.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Coverage: The patent claims a wide class of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine derivatives and their uses, providing extensive market exclusivity potential.

  • Claims Strategy: Dominant claim language emphasizes chemical structure with variable substituents, demanding precise navigation for infringement or licensing.

  • Patent Landscape: Serves as a foundational patent, frequently cited in subsequent related patents, but increasingly challenged by narrower innovations.

  • Legal Considerations: Ongoing patent expiration and strategic patent filings signal a competitive environment focusing on derivatives, specific indications, and synthesis methods.

  • Business Implications: Companies should consider this patent’s broad scope for competitive positioning but remain vigilant about subsequent narrower patents that may limit freedom to operate.


FAQs

1. What is the primary chemical structure claimed in U.S. Patent 5,438,072?
The patent claims a class of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine derivatives with variable substituents, providing a chemical scaffold for a broad range of compounds.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The claims are broad, covering the general chemical genus of derivatives as well as their synthesis methods and therapeutic uses, offering extensive patent protection for compounds within the defined structure.

3. Are there any subsequent patents that limit the scope of this patent?
Yes. Follow-up patents often narrow the scope, focusing on specific derivatives or particular therapeutic indications to circumvent or build upon the original claims.

4. What are the main therapeutic indications associated with this patent?
While originally aimed at CNS disorders and infections, derivatives have potential applications in anti-inflammatory and other pharmacological areas, depending on substituents and specific compounds claimed.

5. How does this patent impact generic drug development?
It creates a significant barrier during its active life, delaying generic entry until expiration or invalidation, but subsequent narrower patents may also influence market entry paths.


References

[1] United States Patent 5,438,072. "Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine Derivatives, Their Production, and Their Use as Pharmaceuticals," issued August 1, 1995.
[2] Patent landscape analyses and related literature on imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,438,072

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,438,072

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
France92 14501Dec 02, 1992

International Family Members for US Patent 5,438,072

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 190838 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 5566994 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 691476 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2150576 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 1090170 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 1291713 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 1636560 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.