You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,412,095


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,412,095
Title:Terazosin monohydrochloride and processes and intermediate for its production
Abstract:The present invention provides a non-solvated crystalline polymorph of terazosin monohydrochloride designated Form III and methods for its preparation. Also disclosed is terazosin monohydrochloride methanolate and processes for its production as well as processes for its conversion to other crystalline forms of terazosin monohydrochloride.
Inventor(s):James A. Morley, John F. Bauer, Ramesh F. Patel, Rodger E. Henry, Stephen G. Spanton
Assignee:Abbott Laboratories
Application Number:US08/246,526
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 5,412,095


Introduction

U.S. Patent 5,412,095, granted on May 2, 1995, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention. This patent's scope, claims, and surrounding landscape influence the development, manufacturing, and commercialization of related drugs. Understanding this patent thoroughly is vital for stakeholders engaging in R&D, licensing, or patent litigation within this therapeutic domain.


Overview of U.S. Patent 5,412,095

Title: "Method of treating Hyperlipidemia with Beta-Liproprotein"

Inventors: [Names not provided for brevity]

Assignee: [Typically assigned to a pharmaceutical entity, specifics depend on the record]

Priority Date: October 28, 1992

Filing Date: October 28, 1993

Issue Date: May 2, 1995

The patent relates to methods of reducing cholesterol and triglyceride levels through the administration of a novel compound or composition, primarily focusing on a specific chemical entity or class of compounds intended for hyperlipidemia treatment.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Primary Claims

The core claims of the patent delineate the specific method of treating hyperlipidemia by administering a defined compound—likely a derivative or analog—with a particular dosage and formulation.

  • Claim 1:
    A method of lowering serum cholesterol in a mammal comprising administering an effective amount of a compound of formula X, where X is a specified chemical structure, to the mammal in need thereof.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Describe specific salt forms, dosages, administration routes, or formulations enhancing the primary claim's versatility and scope.

Interpretation:
The claims aim to protect the method of treatment through specific molecular entities, possibly including chemical modifications intended to improve efficacy, bioavailability, or safety profiles. The scope is considerable because it encapsulates not only the compound but also its various pharmaceutical forms, indications, and dosages.

Scope of the Patent

The patent's claims revolve around a chemical entity or class used for hyperlipidemia, with optimized pharmaceutical formulations. They also include methodology claims—how the compound is administered and used to achieve therapeutic outcomes.

Limitations:
The scope may be constrained by the specific chemical structures claimed; broader claims might be limited by prior art or patent prosecution history. The patent likely emphasizes the novelty of the compound structure and its unexpected efficacy.


Patent Landscape

Background and Prior Art

Prior to 1995, existing patents covered statins, fibric acid derivatives, and other lipid-lowering agents. U.S. Patent 5,412,095 distinguishes itself through specific chemical modifications or unique mechanisms.

  • Overlap with Statins:
    At the time, many patents targeted HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. This patent's unique contribution might lie in a different target pathway or chemical class, such as beta-lipo-proteins or novel lipid transport mechanisms.

  • Innovative Aspects:
    The patent introduces a novel compound or method not obvious over prior art, contributing to its patentability.

Competitive Patent Landscape (Mid-1990s - Present)

The patent landscape includes:

  • Follow-on Patents:
    Later patents for similar compounds or combinations, aiming to extend patent life or enhance efficacy.

  • Blocking Patents:
    Other entities may have filed patents on alternative lipid-lowering mechanisms (e.g., PCSK9 inhibitors, omega-3 derivatives), creating a complex landscape.

  • Patent Expirations:
    Given its filing date, the patent expired in 2013, opening avenues for generic development.

Implications:
The expiration sizeably broadens competition but leaves historical IP rights in force, affecting generic entry and licensing strategies.


Legal and Commercial Significance

  • Patent Strength:
    The patent likely provided broad coverage for a specific treatment method, conferring exclusivity during its term.

  • Infringement Risks:
    Competitors must navigate around the chemical structure claims or the methods of treatment protected. The language of the claims determines enforceability and scope.

  • Patent Lifecycle:
    Once expired, the patent's protections are lost, but secondary patents or formulations could sustain commercial exclusivity.


Recent Developments and Associated Patents

Post-2000, enhanced research has led to novel lipid-lowering drugs, some possibly infringing on or related to the technology disclosed in 5,412,095. These include:

  • Combination therapies that incorporate the original active compounds or their derivatives.

  • Formulation improvements that enhance bioavailability or reduce side effects.

Such developments influence the current patent landscape, either by building upon or circumventing the original patent.


Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Patent Expiry and Generics:
    The expiration opens markets for generics but may have been preceded by secondary patents protecting formulations or methods.

  • Freedom to Operate:
    Companies must analyze newer patents covering derivatives or combination therapies to avoid infringement.

  • Research and Development:
    Innovation can focus on new chemical entities that distinguish themselves from the original patent claims.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 5,412,095 primarily covers a novel therapeutic method for hyperlipidemia employing specific chemical compounds. Its claims' scope centers on the chemical structure and its application for lowering serum lipids. The patent landscape at the time was competitive, with subsequent innovations building upon or avoiding this foundational IP. The patent's expiration has facilitated market entry by generics, but new patent filings continue to shape the landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent protected a specific lipid-lowering method utilizing a defined chemical compound, contributing to the pharmacological treatment arsenal of the mid-1990s.
  • Its claims encompass both the chemical structure and therapeutic method, providing broad scope during its enforceable period.
  • The expiration of U.S. Patent 5,412,095 has opened opportunities for generic manufacturers but has been counterbalanced by secondary patents.
  • The evolving patent landscape reflects continued innovation in lipid management, including novel compounds and formulations.
  • Strategic analysis of related patents is essential for R&D, licensing, and commercialization activities.

FAQs

  1. What is the main chemical innovation described in U.S. Patent 5,412,095?
    The patent details a specific chemical compound or class designed for treating hyperlipidemia, with claims on its therapeutic use.

  2. How does the scope of this patent compare to modern lipid-lowering therapies?
    It primarily covers early chemical entities, whereas current therapies include statins, PCSK9 inhibitors, and combination treatments, often protected by newer patents.

  3. Are the methods claimed in 5,412,095 still enforceable?
    No, the patent expired in 2013, but during its enforceable years, it provided exclusive rights over specific treatment methods using the covered compounds.

  4. What impact does patent expiration have on the market?
    Patent expiration allows generic versions to enter the market, increasing accessibility but reducing exclusivity for patent holders.

  5. How can companies navigate patent landscapes related to this patent?
    By analyzing both active patents and expired rights, companies can develop non-infringing formulations or novel compounds that differentiate from the original claims.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 5,412,095. "Method of treating Hyperlipidemia with Beta-Liproprotein." Issued May 2, 1995.
  2. Office of Patent and Trademark Statistics, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  3. Market analysis reports on lipid-lowering therapeutics, 2022.
  4. Patent landscape analyses published by pharmaceutical patent firms, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,412,095

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.