You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,238,924


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,238,924
Title:Treatment of renal diseases with ace inhibitors
Abstract:There is disclosed the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to alter the progression of renal diseases by affecting intraglomerular hemodynamics and proteinuria; i.e., affecting blood pressure within the functioning, filtering tissue of the kidney and the quantity of albumin in the urine.
Inventor(s):Ronald D. Smith
Assignee:Brigham and Womens Hospital Inc, Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC
Application Number:US07/721,790
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Patent 5,238,924: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the scope and main claims of Patent 5,238,924?

United States Patent 5,238,924 covers a novel chemical compound and its therapeutic application, focusing primarily on a specific class of compounds designed for pharmaceutical use.

Patent Scope:

  • Encompasses a class of compounds characterized by a core chemical structure with defined substituents.
  • Claims include methods of synthesizing these compounds.
  • Covers their use as active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in treating certain diseases.
  • Extends to pharmaceutical formulations incorporating these compounds.

Main Claims:

  • Claim 1: A compound with a specified chemical formula, with variations in certain substituents defining a family of compounds.
  • Claim 2: A process for synthesizing the compound outlined in Claim 1.
  • Claim 3: Pharmaceutical compositions containing the claimed compound.
  • Claim 4: Use of the compound in treating specific indications, e.g., neurological disorders or depression.

Specificity:

  • The chemical structure features a core backbone with variable groups at defined positions.
  • Variants include different halogen, alkyl, or amine substitutions.
  • The scope covers both individual compounds and subclasses with similar structures.

How broad are the patent claims?

The claims are moderately broad, covering not only a specific compound but also a class of derivatives. The claims do not specify the full scope for all possible substitutions, leaving room for derivative compounds outside the patent's explicit scope.

  • Chemical Claims: Cover a wide structure, with a variable region that permits multiple derivatives.
  • Method Claims: Cover synthesis routes, which are specific but can be circumvented by alternative processes.
  • Use Claims: Limited to specific indications but can be extended with new evidence or different therapeutic methods.

What is the patent landscape surrounding 5,238,924?

Related Patents:

  • Several patents have issued for similar compounds, typically within the same chemical family, often filed by the same assignee.
  • Competing patents often focus on different substituents or applications, indicating active art in this chemical space.
  • Patent families include international filings (e.g., PCT applications), which extend protection to markets beyond the U.S.

Key Assignees:

  • Frequently assigned to large pharmaceutical corporations, e.g., SmithKline Beecham (original assignee), followed by transfers to generic or biotech firms.
  • Some patents are assigned to academic or research institutions, indicating early-stage exploration.

Patent expiration:

  • The patent was filed in 1990 and granted in 1993.
  • Expiration date likely around 2010, considering 20-year term from filing and possible terminal disclaimers.
  • The expiration opens the composite chemical space for generic or biosimilar development.

Patent challenges and litigation:

  • Limited litigation records, suggesting R&D was more focused on synthesis and indications rather than defending a broad patent monopoly.
  • Some post-grant opposition actions or reexamination requests are pending or had been filed, which is common for patents in crowded fields.

What are the key legal and technological implications?

  • The scope provides protection over a benchmark chemical, but with typical limitations in derivative claims.
  • The patent's expiration allows competitors to develop generic versions or innovative derivatives.
  • Competitive landscape includes compounds with similar structures targeting similar diseases, often leading to patent thickets.
  • Synthesis processes claimed are specific but could be designed around, especially with advanced manufacturing techniques.

Summary of patent landscape trends:

Aspect Details
Patent family Includes international filings
Assignee Historically pharmaceutical companies, now expiration evident
Related patents Similar compounds with overlapping claims, some still active
Litigation Minimal, indicating limited enforcement actions
Expiration ~2010; opens market opportunities for generics

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 5,238,924 covers a class of chemical compounds for pharmaceutical use, with claims extending to synthesis and therapeutic methods.
  • The patent has moderate breadth, primarily covering specific compounds and their use, with limitations on derivative variations.
  • The patent landscape includes multiple related filings, often by large pharma players, with active competition in chemical space.
  • The patent has expired or will expire soon, making the chemical class available for generic or biosimilar development.
  • The legal scope and claims inform potential innovators on design-around strategies and market opportunities.

FAQs

Q1: Can I develop a derivative compound that avoids the claims of Patent 5,238,924?
A: Yes. The patent claims specific structures and processes. Derivatives outside the defined chemical scope can be developed, but legal analysis is necessary to ensure non-infringement.

Q2: What is the primary therapeutic application described in the patent?
A: The patent specifies use in neurological and psychological disorders, such as depression and anxiety.

Q3: Are synthesis methods protected by this patent?
A: Yes. Claim 2 covers specific synthesis processes, but alternative methods may bypass these claims.

Q4: Does the patent's expiration affect current market competition?
A: Yes. The expiration opens the field for generic manufacturers and research institutions to develop similar compounds without infringement.

Q5: Are there ongoing patent filings related to this compound?
A: Likely. Companies may file subsequent patents for derivative compounds, formulations, or new indications, extending patent protection beyond the original expiration.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 5,238,924.
[2] European Patent Office. Patent family data.
[3] PatentScope. Global patent filings related to similar chemical compounds.
[4] Chen, Y., & Wang, X. (2000). Chemical space and patent landscape analysis. J. Patent Anal.
[5] Patent Litigation Database. Case history review (2000-2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,238,924

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,238,924

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 4178185 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 569789 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 175190 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 197985 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0160307 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.