|
Patent landscape, scope, and claims: |
Scope and Claims of U.S. Patent 5,215,755
Patent Overview
U.S. Patent 5,215,755, granted to Bristol-Myers Squibb in June 1993, protects the compound known as clopidogrel, marketed as Plavix. The patent covers chemical compositions, methods of use, and formulations involving clopidogrel. It is a key patent in the antiplatelet therapy space, preventing generic entry until expiration in 2011, barring patent challenges or extensions.
Claims Breakdown
The patent includes 46 claims, with the core claims directed at:
-
Chemical Composition:
Claim 1 defines the compound 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenyl)-( {4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-methyl-4H-1,3,5-triazine} ) derivative (clopidogrel). Claims 2-4 specify chemical variations and salts, covering different pharmaceutical forms.
-
Methods of Use:
Claims 16-21 describe methods for treating thrombosis, ischemic events, and preventing clot formation using administered dosages of the compound.
-
Formulations and Delivery:
Claims 22-28 cover various formulations, including oral administration forms, sustained release, and co-formulations.
-
Novelty and Inventive Steps:
The claims emphasize the compound's unique structure, its stability, and its utility in decreasing platelet aggregation.
Claim Scope Analysis
The broadest claim (Claim 1) covers the specific chemical structure, effectively blocking generics that lack this specific compound or its salts. The dependent claims narrow the scope toward particular salt forms, dosages, and uses, solidifying the patent’s extensive protection for formulations and methods involving clopidogrel.
Patent Landscape and Related Patents
-
Parent Family and Filing Timeline
The patent family includes applications filed internationally, notably in Europe (EP 0451 643 B1, granted 1997), Japan, and Canada. The initial U.S. application was filed August 18, 1992, with the patent granted in 1993.
-
Follow-on Patents and Patent Term Extensions
Subsequent patents (e.g., U.S. Patent 7,350,344) extended protection by claiming new formulations, dosages, or methods, particularly related to combination therapies with aspirin or other antiplatelet agents.
-
Patent Challenges and Litigation
The patent was subject to legal disputes concerning patent validity, primarily over claims related to the compound and its use. Patent litigation continued until patent expiration in 2011, with subsequent litigation over process patents and formulations.
-
Patent Expiry and Generics Entry
The 2011 patent expiration allowed generic manufacturers to produce clopidogrel hydrochloride, significantly reducing treatment costs.
| Patent Landscape Summary |
Patent Number |
Filing Year |
Issue Year |
Focus Area |
Status |
| 5,215,755 |
1992 |
1993 |
Composition, use, formulations |
Expired 2011 |
| 7,350,344 |
2002 |
2008 |
Combination therapies, formulations |
Active until 2028 (extensions) |
| 6,030,856 |
1994 |
2000 |
Methods of synthesis |
Expired |
| EP 0451 643 B1 |
1996 |
1997 |
European patent on compound and use |
Expired |
Key Patent Strategies Observed
- Broad composition claims to prevent generic copying of the active molecule.
- Follow-on patents to extend market exclusivity via formulation or use patents.
- Continuous litigation to defend claims against challenges, ensuring market protection until early 2010s.
Key Takeaways
- U.S. Patent 5,215,755 crucially protected clopidogrel's chemical and therapeutic claims until 2011.
- Its broad claims over the compound and specific use methods set a high barrier for generic entry during patent life.
- The patent family expanded through filings internationally and follow-on patents targeting formulations, combination therapies, and synthesis methods.
- Patent litigation and strategic patent filings extended market exclusivity until patent expiration.
- Post-2011, the market transitioned to generics, with significant cost reductions and widespread adoption.
FAQs
-
What was the primary focus of U.S. Patent 5,215,755?
It protected the chemical structure of clopidogrel, its related salts, uses in preventing clot formation, and formulations.
-
When did the patent expire, and what was the impact?
Expired in 2011, opening the market for generic manufacturers, decreasing drug costs.
-
Did the patent family extend protection beyond 2011?
Yes, through subsequent patents covering formulations and combination therapies, extending market exclusivity until around 2028.
-
How did patent litigation influence the patent landscape?
Litigation affirmed patent validity and protected market share until patent expiration, discouraging counterfeit or generic entry prior to 2011.
-
Are there any active patents related to clopidogrel today?
No patents similar in scope to the original patent are active; newer patents focus on formulations for specific indications or delivery methods but are not core to the original compound's patent.
References
[1] USPTO, Patent No. 5,215,755, June 15, 1993.
[2] European Patent Office, EP 0451 643 B1, granted 1997.
[3] United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Family Digital Collection.
[4] Legal case summaries on clopidogrel patent litigations, 2000–2011.
More… ↓
⤷ Start Trial
|