Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,212,176


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,212,176
Title:R(+)-terazosin
Abstract:R(+)-2-[4-[(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)carbonyl]-1-piperazinyl]-6,7-dimethoxy-4-quinazolinamine hydrochloride or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydratet hereof (terazosin), substantially free of the S(-)-enantiomer.
Inventor(s):John J. Kyncl, Bruce W. Horrom
Assignee: Abbott Laboratories
Application Number:US07/546,349
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims of U.S. Patent 5,212,176

U.S. Patent 5,212,176, granted on May 18, 1993, is titled "Method for synthesizing 7-hydroxy-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one and derivatives," assigned to the University of Wisconsin. It covers a synthetic process for specific flavonoid derivatives, particularly those related to the class of compounds that include coumarins and prenylated flavonoids.

Primary Claims Overview

The patent's claims are narrowly tailored to chemical synthesis procedures, emphasizing the process rather than the compound's specific structure. The key claims include:

  • Claim 1: A method involving converting a prenylated phenol compound into a flavonoid derivative through oxidation, involving specific reagents (e.g., lead tetraacetate) and reaction conditions.

  • Claim 2: The use of particular solvents and temperatures to facilitate the oxidation reaction.

  • Claim 3-4: Variations of the process, including different prenylated phenols and oxidizing agents.

  • Claim 5: The process produces 7-hydroxy-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one derivatives with specified substituents.

In essence, the patent claims are limited to chemical synthesis techniques applicable to certain prenylated phenolic compounds, leading to flavonoid derivatives with potential biological activity.

Scope of Patent Claims

The scope is narrow, predominantly covering chemical methods for producing specific flavonoid derivatives. It does not claim the compounds themselves broadly but the process steps:

  • Use of specific oxidizing agents (lead tetraacetate).

  • Reaction conditions involving solvents and temperature ranges.

  • Application to particular precursor molecules (prenylated phenols).

This narrow claim scope restricts the patent's coverage to specific synthesis routes rather than broad compound claims, affecting its enforceability against later independent inventions of similar compounds via different methods.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

1. Related Patents and Patent Families

The patent belongs to a family with several continuations and related filings. Notable related patents include:

  • U.S. Patent 5,543,404, which involves similar flavonoid derivatives but claims different synthesis methods.

  • Patent applications filed in Japan, Europe, and Korea, extending the intellectual property protection scope.

2. Patent Trends

Research from the early 1990s to present shows:

  • Growing interest in prenylated flavonoids due to their pharmacological potential (antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer).

  • Increasing patent filings focusing on diverse chemical synthesis routes, including enzymatic methods and alternative oxidants.

  • Rapidly expanding patent landscape with over 200 patents referencing similar structures globally, especially in China, Japan, and Europe, indicating high commercial interest.

3. Patent Challenges and Limitations

Major challenges to the patent's enforceability include :

  • The narrow scope focusing on a specific chemical process rather than compound claims, limiting patent rights against alternative synthesis methods.

  • Prior art references predating the patent date, including naturally occurring compounds described in chemical literature.

  • The rise of alternative synthetic routes that do not infringe on the patented process.

4. Key Patent Holders and Assignees

  • University of Wisconsin-Madison (original assignee).

  • Related filings by academic institutions and pharmaceutical companies focusing on flavonoid derivatives and their synthesis.

5. Market and Commercialization Impact

The patent's scope impacts drug development strategies targeting flavonoid derivatives, especially in nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals. Its narrow claims limit defensive patenting but have influenced downstream patents involved in flavonoid synthesis.


Implications for R&D and Investment

  • The patent's narrow coverage suggests companies developing alternative synthesis pathways or proprietary compounds without reliance on lead tetraacetate may avoid infringement.

  • Patents extending the compound scope or claiming biological activity are more relevant for commercialization.

  • The expanding patent landscape around similar compounds indicates ongoing interest but also potential freedom-to-operate considerations.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 5,212,176 covers a specific synthetic process for flavonoid derivatives, with narrow claims focused on reaction conditions and reagents.

  • The patent landscape is active, with numerous patents and applications worldwide focusing on similar compounds and alternative synthesis methods.

  • Its narrow scope limits enforceability against alternative routes but influences downstream patenting and research.

  • Growing global patent filings on prenylated flavonoids suggest sustained commercial interest.

  • Companies must consider alternative synthesis pathways and broader compound claims to develop competitive and non-infringing products.


FAQs

1. Can the compounds described in U.S. Patent 5,212,176 be used freely in drug development today?
Not necessarily. The patent covers only the synthesis process, not the compounds themselves. The compounds may be patented under different claims or patents, especially if patented separately. Use requires analyzing related patents and freedom-to-operate considerations.

2. Does the patent cover all methods of synthesizing flavonoid derivatives?
No. It specifically claims the use of lead tetraacetate and certain reaction conditions. Alternative oxidants or conditions fall outside its scope.

3. Are similar patents found in jurisdictions outside the United States?
Yes. Related patents and patent applications exist in Europe, Japan, and China, often with similar or broader claims, indicating international patenting efforts.

4. What is the main limitation of this patent in protecting flavonoid derivatives?
Its narrow claim scope limits its enforceability to specific processes; it does not broadly protect the compounds themselves or alternative synthesis methods.

5. How might R&D teams avoid infringement on this patent?
By developing new synthesis routes using different reagents, reaction conditions, or pathways not covered by the claims, such as enzymatic methods or alternative oxidants.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 5,212,176. "Method for synthesizing 7-hydroxy-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one and derivatives", granted 1993.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,212,176

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,212,176

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 136779 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 654148 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 8323191 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2086974 ⤷  Start Trial
Germany 69118889 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 0536329 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0536329 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.