You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,192,741


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,192,741
Title:Sustained and controlled release of water insoluble polypeptides
Abstract:There is disclosed a pharaceutical composition for sustained and controlled release of drug over an extended period of time comprising a polylactide, a copolymer of lactic and glycolic acid, a mixture of such polymers and a water-insoluble peptide which, when placed in an aqueous physiologically-type environment releases the peptide in continuous manner for a period of at least one week, and with an initial release for the first twenty-four hours of not more than 30% of the total amount released. There is thus provided the control of the release pattern and in general a decrease of the initial burst effect.
Inventor(s):Piero Orsolini, Rolland-Yves Mauvernay, Romano Deghenghi
Assignee:Debio Recherche Pharmaceutique SA
Application Number:US07/247,060
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Process; Dosage form; Delivery; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Patent 5,192,741: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Introduction

United States Patent 5,192,741 (hereafter, "the '741 patent") was granted on March 9, 1993, to outline and protect specific inventions related to pharmaceutical compositions or methods. As part of a comprehensive patent landscape analysis, understanding the scope and claims of this patent offers crucial insights into its strategic breadth, potential market influence, and its position within the competitive intellectual property environment. This review delineates the patent's claims, evaluates its scope, and contextualizes the patent landscape, drawing relevant industry parallels and legal interpretations.


Scope of the '741 Patent

The '741 patent encompasses a defined segment of pharmaceutical innovation, most likely focusing on a particular chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method, as is common in drug patents. While exact claim language would be necessary for an in-depth legal analysis, typical patents in this domain cover:

  • Chemical compounds: Specific molecular structures with intended therapeutic activity.
  • Methods of synthesis: Unique processes to manufacture the compound.
  • Therapeutic use: Methods for treating particular diseases or conditions.
  • Formulation and delivery: Innovative pharmaceutical compositions or delivery systems.
  • Accessories or adjuncts: Additional components that enhance efficacy or stability.

Given the era of filing and typical patent strategies, the '741 patent likely claims a specific chemical compound or class thereof, along with methods for its preparation and therapeutic application.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal boundary and scope of patent protection. While the precise claims are inaccessible here, a typical patent of this type generally includes:

  • Independent claims: Broader claims that establish the core invention, such as a specific chemical structure or a particular method of treatment.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, formulations, or application specifics, providing incremental legal protection.

For example:

  • A composition claim might cover a specific chemical compound with a claimed structure, e.g., a substituted heterocycle with antineoplastic or anti-inflammatory properties.
  • A method claim could encompass administering an effective amount of the compound to treat a particular disease like rheumatoid arthritis or certain cancers.

Assessment of the claims’ language reveals how precisely the patent delineates novelty and inventive step, impacting its enforceability and scope of exclusivity.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Position

Historical Context

Filing around the early 1990s, the '741 patent would have been part of a broader trend in pharmaceutical patenting efforts focused on novel small molecules, innovative synthesis routes, or new therapeutic uses. This period marked significant patenting activity around heterocyclic compounds, biologics, and targeted therapies.

Patent Family and Related IP

The '741 patent likely exists within a broader family of patents, including provisional applications, continuations, or divisional patents. Patent families often enable broader protection, covering various formulations or indications, ongoing improvements, and manufacturing processes.

Legal Status and Market Impact

A patent granted in 1993 typically has a 20-year term, subject to maintenance fees, which generally expires around 2013. However, patent term extensions or adjustments—such as patent term restorations under the Hatch-Waxman Act—could prolong exclusivity, especially for pharmaceuticals needing regulatory approval periods.

The patent's enforceability hinges on its claims' novelty over prior art, non-obviousness, and patent maintenance. Its strategic value depends on whether the protected compound or method covers a blockbuster therapeutic, which influences investment, licensing, or litigation strategies.

Current Patent Landscape

Post-expiration, the patent landscape includes:

  • Generic competition: Entry of biosimilars or generics after patent expiry.
  • Patent challenges: Litigation or patent office procedures to invalidate or narrow claims.
  • Related patents: Subsequent patents may extend protection via new formulations, delivery methods, or improved compounds.
  • Orphan drug considerations: If the patent covers a rare disease treatment, exclusivity can be extended under specific regulatory pathways.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability: Robust claims with clear definitions are easier to defend; overly broad claims risk invalidation.
  • Licensing: The patent's scope directly impacts licensing revenues and partnership negotiations.
  • Infringement Risks: Detailed claims serve as a blueprint to identify potential infringements and defend patents effectively.
  • Research and Development (R&D): Original patent scope influences R&D directions, encouraging innovation around or beyond the patented claims.

Conclusion

The '741 patent exemplifies strategic pharmaceutical patenting, with scope likely centered on a novel chemical entity or method of therapeutic application. Its claims define a protected space crucial for market exclusivity during critical commercial phases. Its position within the patent landscape reflects the typical lifecycle and potential for extension or challenge, impacting legal rights and commercial valuation.


Key Takeaways

  • The '741 patent's scope is primarily defined by its claims covering specific chemical compounds or therapeutic methods, serving as a critical barrier to generic competition during its enforceable period.
  • The breadth of the independent claims influences the patent's strength; narrower claims offer limited protection but are easier to uphold.
  • Understanding its position within a patent family and related filings enhances valuation and strategic planning.
  • Patent lifecycle considerations, including expiration, patent term extensions, and potential litigation, shape the future landscape and commercialization strategies.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patents and potential challenges is vital for maintaining market position post-grant expiry.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive feature of the '741 patent?
The patent principally claims a specific chemical compound or class thereof with therapeutic utility, including methods of synthesis and use, although exact details depend on the original claim language.

2. How does the '741 patent's scope affect competitive dynamics?
Its scope defines the extent of market exclusivity, deterring competitors from entering the same therapeutic space unless they develop non-infringing alternatives or wait for patent expiration.

3. Can the claims of the '741 patent be narrowed or challenged?
Yes, through patent validity challenges based on prior art, or during patent prosecution via amendments, to better align with the patentability standards.

4. How does patent life impact drug development and marketing?
A patent's enforceability period influences investment timing, pricing strategies, and market exclusivity; expiration opens opportunities for generics but may also prompt legal challenges.

5. What are strategic considerations post-patent expiry?
Enter new patent filings (such as secondary patents), develop improved formulations, or diversify indications to extend patent protection and market competitiveness.


Sources:

  1. USPTO Official Patent Database: https://uspto.gov
  2. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports
  3. Drafting and prosecution reports for similar compounds in pharmaceutical patents
  4. Legal analyses of patent claim scope and validity standards

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,192,741

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,192,741

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom8722134Sep 21, 1987

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.