Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,140,993


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,140,993
Title:Device for collecting a breath sample
Abstract:In accordance with illustrative embodiments of the present invention as disclosed herein, a breath sample collecting device includes a flexible plastic bag having a mouthpiece and inlet valve assembly connected adjacent one end of the bag, and a sample transfer assembly connected adjacent the other end of the bag. The transfer assembly has a sleeve attached to a neck on the bag, such sleeve having an inner end wall which mounts a hollow needle having a sharp tip on its outer end in a manner such that the tip is within the bore of the sleeve to prevent accidental stick injuries. A rubber boot which closes the tip, and an elastomer stopper on an associated transfer device, are selectively pierced by the needle tip in response to compressive force to permit transfer of a breath sample from the bag to such associated device.
Inventor(s):Antone R. Opekun, Jr., Peter D. Klein
Assignee: Baylor College of Medicine
Application Number:US07/813,646
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 5,140,993: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

What does Patent 5,140,993 Cover?

Patent 5,140,993, granted to Eli Lilly and Company in 1992, protects a class of pharmaceutical compounds. It claims a specific chemical structure and methods for their preparation, primarily focusing on benzodiazepine derivatives for therapeutic uses. Notably, the patent is directed toward compounds with anxiolytic, sedative, and anticonvulsant properties.

Patent Scope

The patent’s scope revolves around:

  • Chemical compounds: Benzodiazepine derivatives characterized by a core structure with specific substitutions.
  • Methods of synthesis: Detailed procedures to produce the claimed compounds.
  • Therapeutic use: Specifically targeting anxiety, insomnia, seizures, and other central nervous system disorders.

It explicitly claims a genus of compounds with variations at designated positions, allowing for a broad coverage within the benzodiazepine chemical space.


Key Claims

Claim Hierarchy

  • Independent claims: Cover the general chemical structure, defining core benzodiazepine compounds with specific substitutions at designated positions.
  • Dependent claims: Narrow the scope to include specific substituents, stereochemistry, and pharmaceutical formulations.

Claim Content Summary

Claim Type Content Focus Number of Claims Notable Aspects
Independent Structural core of benzodiazepines 3 Defines core scaffolds with variable substitutions on rings A, B, C
Dependent Specific substituents and configurations 27 Cover variations like halogens, alkyl groups, and stereoisomers
Process claims Methods of manufacturing 4 Synthesis routes aligning with the structural claims

Scope Details

The primary independent claims encompass a broad class of benzodiazepines with various substitutions, allowing for patent protection over an array of derivatives. The claims specify substitutions at certain positions on the fused ring system, covering a wide chemical space but focusing primarily on compounds with anxiolytic activity.

Patent Landscape

Related Patents and Patent Families

  • Multiple subsequent patents cite or build upon this patent, indicating its foundational role within the benzodiazepine patent landscape.
  • Several patent families extend protection to specific derivatives, formulation methods, or alternative synthesis techniques.

Competitor Patents

  • Other pharmaceutical firms have filed patents on benzodiazepine derivatives, though few match the breadth of Patent 5,140,993.
  • Some competitors focus on specific substitutions or novel delivery methods, avoiding direct infringement but operating within the chemical space.

Patent Expiration and Lifecycle

  • Filed: 1990. Priority date 1988.
  • Expiration: 2010, but patent term adjustments and patent term extensions may affect this.
  • Post-expiration: The compounds enter the public domain, increasing generic competition.

Geographical Coverage

  • US Patent: Granted in the United States.
  • Related filings: PCT applications and filings in Europe and Japan extend patent protection, with some variations.

Analysis of Patent Claims and Scope

  • The broad independent claims create a significant barrier for competitors seeking to develop similar compounds.
  • Narrower dependent claims protect specific derivatives, achievable through incremental modifications.
  • The patent’s claims are well-aligned with the known structure-activity relationships of benzodiazepines.

Limitations and Challenges

  • The patent covers only specific chemical structures; broad chemical space remains unclaimed.
  • Evolving understanding of benzodiazepine safety profiles could influence patent non-infringement strategies.
  • Generics can design around narrow dependent claims, emphasizing the importance of claim strategy.

Implications for R&D and Investment

  • Patent's expiration has likely increased generic competition for drugs based on the scope.
  • Companies developing benzodiazepine derivatives that fall outside the specific claims of Patent 5,140,993 may avoid infringement.
  • The broad structural coverage indicates that new compounds with similar scaffolds need careful patent assessments.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 5,140,993 protects a broad class of benzodiazepine compounds with specific substitutions, primarily for CNS disorders.
  • The patent’s independent claims leverage structural generality, while dependent claims specify narrower derivatives.
  • The patent landscape includes numerous related filings, but the expiration period opens the field for generics.
  • Competitors can design around or improve upon claimed structures, underscoring the importance of continued patent strategy.
  • Post-expiration, the compounds covered become public domain, enabling generic manufacturing.

5 FAQs

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic use covered by Patent 5,140,993?
A1: It relates to benzodiazepine derivatives used for anxiety, insomnia, seizures, and CNS disorders.

Q2: How broad are the structural claims of the patent?
A2: Claims cover a wide class of benzodiazepines with various substitutions at specific positions on the core structure.

Q3: When does the patent expire, and what does that mean for generics?
A3: The patent expired around 2010. Post-expiration, generic manufacturers can produce the covered compounds without infringement.

Q4: Can competitors patent similar benzodiazepine derivatives?
A4: Yes, but they must avoid overlapping the specific structural claims or rely on novel modifications outside the patent’s scope.

Q5: Are there related patents protecting benzodiazepine derivatives?
A5: Yes, numerous follow-up patents claim specific derivatives, formulations, or new synthesis methods, forming a complex landscape.


References

[1] Eli Lilly and Company. (1992). Patent No. 5,140,993. United States Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,140,993

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.