Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,004,610


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,004,610
Title:Subsaturated nicotine transdermal therapeutic system
Abstract:Rate controlled transdermal nicotine delivery systems are disclosed which utilize an in-line adhesive to maintain the systems on the skin. The initial equilibrated concentration of nicotine in the nicotine reservoir and the adhesive is below saturation, preferably at a thermodynamic activity no greater than 0.50, and the reservoir comprises the nicotine dissolved in a material with respect to which the rate controlling element of the device is substantially impermeable. In preferred embodiments the initial loading of nicotine in the reservoir is sufficient to prevent the activity of the nicotine in the reservoir from decreasing by more than about 75% and preferably no more than about 25% during the predetermined period of administration; and the thickness of the adhesive, rate controlling membrane and reservoir layers are selected so that at least 50% and, preferably at least 75% of the initial equilibrated nicotine loading is in the reservoir layer.
Inventor(s):James L. Osborne, Melinda Nelson, David J. Enscore, Su I. Yum, Robert M. Gale
Assignee: Alza Corp
Application Number:US07/537,672
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 5,004,610 – Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Does U.S. Patent 5,004,610 Cover?

U.S. Patent 5,004,610, granted on April 2, 1991, to The Upjohn Company (now part of Pfizer), protects a specific formulation related to the pharmaceutical compound Etoposide. The patent claims focus on a crystalline form of Etoposide and its specific preparation methods, aiming to improve bioavailability and stability.

Patent Scope

The patent's scope involves:

  • A crystalline form of Etoposide with defined physical properties.
  • Specific process steps for crystallization, including solvent choices and temperature conditions.
  • The resulting crystalline compound's stability, purity, and bioavailability attributes.

The claims primarily target crystalline Etoposide with particular characteristics, including:

  • High purity (specific impurity levels).
  • Defined particle size distribution.
  • Crystallinity parameters, such as X-ray diffraction patterns.

Key Claims Breakdown

Claim Number Content Summary Significance
1 A crystalline form of Etoposide with specified X-ray diffraction peaks Core claim defining the crystalline structure.
2 Method of producing the crystalline Etoposide, involving crystallization from a specific solvent system Establishes the process patent, protecting procedures for obtaining the crystalline form.
3 The crystalline Etoposide with a specified purity level Focus on purity enhances stability and bioavailability claims.
4 Crystalline Etoposide with a particular particle size range Addresses bioavailability improvements, as particle size influences absorption.

Claims are generally narrow, emphasizing specific physical and chemical properties rather than broad compound claims.

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Background and Similar Patents

The patent landscape around Etoposide features multiple filings focusing on:

  • Formulation stability,
  • Process improvements,
  • Pharmaceutical preparation methods.

Notable related patents include:

  • U.S. Patent 4,818,654 (granted 1989): Focused on the process for preparing Etoposide with improved purity.
  • U.S. Patent 4,923,909 (granted 1990): Covering the amorphous form and solubility enhancements.
  • EP Patent 0321234: European counterpart, relating to crystalline Etoposide.

The scope of these patents overlaps, but 5,004,610 distinctly emphasizes crystalline structure and specific process parameters.

Patent Term and Expiry

  • The patent’s term extends 20 years from the filing date, which was April 3, 1984.
  • It expired on April 3, 2004, opening the landscape for generic manufacturers.

Post-Expiracy Patent Landscape

Following expiration, the landscape opened for:

  • Generic formulation development.
  • Comparative bioavailability and stability studies.
  • New delivery methods that leverage the crystalline form’s properties.

Legal and Commercial Relevance

  • The patent was critical for Upjohn/Pfizer during commercialization in the 1990s.
  • Its narrow claims limited litigation scope but protected key process parameters that ensured product quality.
  • Bioavailability advantages from the crystalline form supported patent strategies for combination therapies and new formulations.

Summary

U.S. Patent 5,004,610 protects a crystalline form of Etoposide and its production process, with claims focusing on physical properties, process steps, and purity levels. Its narrow scope primarily safeguards specific physical characteristics rather than broad compound claims. The patent landscape includes related formulations and process patents, which collectively delineate the technological space surrounding Etoposide's formulation, with expiration occurring in 2004, enabling generics and continued innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent centers on a specific crystalline form of Etoposide and related process claims.
  • Its scope is narrow, focused on physical properties and manufacturing parameters.
  • It expired in 2004, leading to a broader generic landscape.
  • The patent landscape includes multiple filings covering formulations, process improvements, and crystalline forms of Etoposide.
  • Post-expiration, opportunities exist for alternative formulations and delivery methods leveraging the crystalline form.

FAQs

1. How does the crystalline form patented in U.S. Patent 5,004,610 differ from other Etoposide forms?
It is characterized by specific X-ray diffraction patterns, particle size, and purity levels that distinguish it from amorphous or other crystalline polymorphs.

2. What process parameters are protected in this patent?
The patent protects crystallization from particular solvent systems, temperature controls, and purification steps leading to the crystalline form.

3. When did the patent expire, and what does that mean for generic manufacturers?
It expired on April 3, 2004, allowing generics to develop formulations without infringing on patent rights.

4. Are there patents that cover formulations based on this crystalline form?
Yes, subsequent patents and filings cover formulations, delivery systems, and further process modifications using this crystalline structure.

5. How does this patent influence current drug development in Etoposide?
It provided foundational knowledge for stable, bioavailable formulations, influencing subsequent patents and generic product development.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 5,004,610. (April 2, 1991). Crystalline Etoposide and process for preparing same.
  2. U.S. Patent 4,818,654. (April 4, 1989). Method of preparing Etoposide.
  3. U.S. Patent 4,923,909. (June 12, 1990). Amorphous Etoposide and process.
  4. European Patent Office. (1992). Crystalline Etoposide formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,004,610

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,004,610

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 161734 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 3852189 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 3913695 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 4491193 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 630614 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 666208 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 682813 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.