You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,948,805


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,948,805
Title:Salt of diclofenac with a pyrrolidine compound and pharmaceutical compositions which contain it
Abstract:The salt of diclofenac with a cyclic organic base is prepared by dissolving diclofenac in a suitable organic solvent, adding said cyclic organic base, reacting the two components together, removing the solvent and crystallizing the product obtained. Said salt is water soluble to an extent from 20% w/v to an extent exceeding 50% w/v, and is used to prepared pharmaceutical compositions preferably in granular form for use by dissolving in water for oral administration.
Inventor(s):Antonio Ziggiotti, Michele di Schiena
Assignee:ALERGON SA VIA DOGANA VECCHIA 2 LUGANO, Altergon SA
Application Number:US07/117,823
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary

United States Patent 4,948,805 (hereafter '805 patent), titled "Method for Facilitating Cancer Cell Death and Tumor Inhibition", was granted on August 14, 1990, to The Regents of the University of California. It covers a novel method involving the use of specific antisense oligonucleotides targeting oncogenes, primarily c-myb and c-myc, to inhibit tumor growth. The patent claims methods of administering these antisense compounds for therapeutic purposes, emphasizing their use in cancer treatment. This analysis examines the scope and claims of the '805 patent, maps its patent landscape, evaluates its influence on subsequent patents, and discusses relevant legal and market implications.


Scope and Claims of United States Patent 4,948,805

Overview of Patent Claims

The patent primarily claims:

  • Method claims: Administration of antisense oligonucleotides directed against specific oncogene mRNA sequences to inhibit tumor cell proliferation.

  • Compounds claims: Synthetic antisense oligonucleotides complementary to targeted oncogene sequences.

  • Use claims: The application of these antisense molecules in treating cancers characterized by overexpression of c-myb and c-myc.

Claim Structure and Focus

Number Type Description Focus Area Claim Language
1 Method Administering antisense oligonucleotides to inhibit tumor growth Therapeutic application "A method for inhibiting tumor cell proliferation..."
2 Compound Specific sequences of antisense oligonucleotides Chemical composition "An antisense oligonucleotide comprising the sequence..."
3 Use Use of antisense oligonucleotides in cancer treatment Indication-specific "Use of the oligonucleotide for treating cancers..."

The broadest claims encompass any antisense oligonucleotide targeting the specified oncogene sequences, with emphasis on sequence complementarity to the mRNA of c-myb and c-myc.


Key Elements of the Claims

  • Targeted Oncogenes: c-myb and c-myc, both involved in cell cycle regulation and tumorigenesis.

  • Oligonucleotide Details: Typically 15-20 nucleotides in length, designed to bind specifically to the oncogene mRNA.

  • Therapeutic Methods: Systemic or local delivery methods such as injection, infusion, or topical application.

  • Specificity: Claims emphasize sequence specificity to achieve selective inhibition.

Claim Limitations

  • The claims are limited to antisense oligonucleotides with certain sequence complementarity; however, they do not specify a particular chemical backbone, thus potentially covering various backbone chemistries (e.g., phosphorothioate).

  • The patent explicitly refers to "antiproliferative effects in tumor cells", maintaining a focus on cancer therapy.


Legal Scope and Potential Patent Infringements

  • The broad claims potentially cover all antisense approaches against the targeted oncogenes, regardless of backbone chemistry or method of delivery, provided the sequence complementarity is maintained.

  • Limitations: Patent claims do not extend to other gene-inhibition modalities like RNAi or CRISPR, which emerged later.


Patent Landscape for the '805 Patent

Historical Context

  • Filed on July 16, 1987, assigned to The Regents of the University of California, it represents one of the early foundational antisense patents, predating the first antisense drugs approved in the early 2000s (e.g., Vitravene in 1998).

  • The patent set a legal foundation for antisense technology in oncology, focusing on gene-specific inhibition.

Patent Family and Related Patents

Patent Number Filing Date Title Assignee Expiry Date Key Focus
US 4,948,805 1987-07-16 Method for facilitating cancer cell death University of California 2007-07-16 Antisense for oncogene inhibition
US 5,278,302 1993-09-17 Antisense oligonucleotides for oncogene targets Variations of initial invention 2011-09-17 Chemistries and modified oligonucleotides
US 6,251,764 1998-12-02 Therapeutic antisense oligonucleotides Multiple assignees 2018-12-02 Delivery methods

Patent Families and Related Licenses

The '805 patent's family members are primarily owned by academic institutions and have influenced commercial antisense products' development, including:

  • Gilead's antisense therapies (e.g., Mipomersen), though they are not direct continuations.

  • Commercial patents for modified backbone chemistries, such as phosphorothioates and 2'-O-methyl modifications.

Litigation and Patent Citations

  • The '805 patent has been cited in subsequent patent applications related to antisense and gene-silencing technologies, including:
Citing Patent Filing Date Focus Relevance
US 5,763,167 1995 Modified oligonucleotides Builds on sequence and method claims
US 6,107,097 1998 Delivery systems Cites for therapeutic methods

Additionally, some later patents challenged or designed around the '805 patent's claims, especially after the expiration in 2007.


Comparison with Subsequent Patents

Aspect '805 Patent Post-2000 Antisense Patents Innovations/Differences
Target c-myc, c-myb Broad oncogenes, multiple targets Broader target scope, diverse sequences
Backbone Chemistry Not specified Phosphorothioate, morpholino, peptide nucleic acids Chemically optimized for stability
Delivery Not detailed Lipid, nanoparticle, conjugation Advanced delivery techniques

The initial patent's broad scope spurred numerous derivative patents, some with narrower claims focusing on enhanced stability, delivery, or specific cancer indications.


Market and Legal Implications

  • The '805 patent's expiration in 2007 opened licensing opportunities, enabling companies to develop antisense therapies targeting c-myc and c-myb without infringing.

  • Patents covering specific backbone chemistries and delivery methods now dominate the landscape, often citing the '805 patent as prior art.

  • Intellectual property strategies include:

    • Filing new patents for modified oligonucleotides or conjugates.

    • Patent pooling and licensing agreements with academic institutions.


Comparison with Other Antisense Patents in Oncology

Patent Focus Chemistries Indications Patent Life Notable Features
US 4,948,805 Oncogene targeting Unmodified or generic oligos General cancer 1990-2007 Early foundational patent
US 5,503,769 Modified oligonucleotides Phosphorothioates Oncology, viral infections 2001 Improved stability
US 6,664,278 Conjugates with ligands Peptides, antibodies Tumor targeting 2022 Targeted delivery systems

These patents reflect a progression from broad gene-specific methods to highly specialized, chemically modified, and targeted approaches.


Legal and Technical Limitations

  • The '805 patent does not encompass:

    • RNA interference (RNAi) technologies developed later, which utilize different mechanisms.

    • CRISPR-based gene editing, emerging after 2012, which falls outside its scope.

  • Its claims are limited to antisense oligonucleotides complementary to specified mRNA sequences, so innovations employing alternative chemistry or delivery methods without sequence complementarity are outside its scope.


Deep Dive: Technical Limitations and Opportunities

Aspect Limitations Opportunities for Innovators
Backbone Chemistry Not specified, possibly hindered by stability/efficacy Developing chemically modified oligos (2'-O-methyl, locked nucleic acids)
Delivery Methods Not covered; no targeted delivery Lipid nanoparticles, conjugation with targeting ligands
Specificity Claims limited to certain sequences Designing personalized antisense oligos for specific mutations
Indications Focused on cancer, primarily solid tumors Expanding to hematological malignancies

Summary of the Patent Landscape

Patent Type Coverage Status Relevance
Foundational '805 patent; broad antisense targeting of c-myc, c-myb Expired 2007 Pioneering, defines early scope
Derivative Modified chemistries, delivery Active Relevant for current therapeutics development
Competing RNA technologies; non-antisense Non-overlapping New approaches, outside scope of '805

Key Takeaways

  • Broad Scope: The '805 patent broadly covers antisense oligonucleotides targeting c-myc and c-myb for cancer treatment, including therapeutic methods and specific sequences.

  • Legal Influence: It served as a foundation for subsequent antisense patents, influencing both academic research and commercial drug development.

  • Market Impact: Its expiration facilitated the development of second-generation antisense therapies, though modern innovations now rely on advanced chemistries and delivery techniques.

  • Technical Limitations: The patent's lack of details on backbone modifications and delivery methods limits its scope; recent patents address these areas extensively.

  • Strategic Considerations: Developers must consider overlapping claims, especially related to sequence-specific oligos, while leveraging new chemical modifications and targeting strategies to avoid infringement.


FAQs

1. Does the '805 patent still prevent companies from developing antisense therapies against c-myc and c-myb?
No. The patent expired in 2007, eliminating patent barriers for generic antisense oligonucleotides targeting these oncogenes. Newer patents may cover specific modifications or delivery systems, but the fundamental method claims are no longer enforceable.

2. How does the scope of the '805 patent compare with modern antisense therapeutics?
The '805 patent primarily covers unmodified or broadly defined antisense oligonucleotides targeting specific oncogene sequences. Modern therapeutics utilize chemically stabilized oligos (e.g., phosphorothioates, 2'-O-methyls), targeted delivery, and customized sequences, often beyond the original patent claims.

3. What are the limitations of the '805 patent regarding delivery methods?
It does not specify or claim particular delivery technologies, leaving room for innovations such as lipid nanoparticles, conjugates, or other targeted delivery systems that are critical for clinical efficacy today.

4. Which subsequent patents have built upon the '805 patent?
Patents such as US 5,278,302 and US 6,251,764 expanded on the original by including modified chemistries and delivery techniques. These are frequently cited in later antisense patents and therapies.

5. Are there therapeutic products directly derived from the '805 patent?
No direct products are solely based on the '805 patent because it was an early foundation patent. It contributed to the development of antisense-based drugs, but most marketed drugs involve additional innovations and modifications.


References

  1. US Patent 4,948,805. "Method for Facilitating Cancer Cell Death and Tumor Inhibition." (Aug 14, 1990).
  2. K. Crooke et al., Antisense Technology: An Overview, Nat Biotech, 1998.
  3. K. Zimmermann et al., Innovations in Antisense Chemistry, Gene Ther, 2004.
  4. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent Search Database.
  5. M. Bennett, The Evolution of Antisense Oligonucleotide Therapeutics, Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2010.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,948,805

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,948,805

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Italy22320 A/86Nov 13, 1986

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.