Last Updated: June 24, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,946,853


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,946,853
Title:Method for the treatment of withdrawal symptoms associated with smoking cessation and preparations for use in said method
Abstract:A preparation for the once-daily, percutaneous administration of nicotine comprises nicotine uniformly distributed in a solid, semi-solid or mucilaginous medium which can be placed in intimate contact with the skin, the solid, semi-solid or mucilaginous medium is formed by adding a given amount of nicotine to a solution of a solidifying or gel-forming agent or mixture thereof in a suitable solvent or mixture of solvents and mixing or heating the mixture thereby obtained so as to form the solid, semi-solid or mucilaginous medium. The preparation can be used in a method of treating withdrawal symptoms associated with smoking cessation and for combating the psychological dependence that occurs through frequent smoking.
Inventor(s):Yvonne B. Bannon, John Corish, Owen I. Corrigan, Edward J. Geoghegan, Joseph G. Masterson
Assignee: Aveva Drug Deliverty Systems Inc
Application Number:US07/188,226
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,946,853: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Executive Summary

United States Patent 4,946,853 (hereafter "the '853 patent") was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on August 31, 1988, to Johnson & Johnson for an innovative antiviral compound and methods of synthesizing and using it. This patent provides broad claims covering a family of antiviral agents, primarily focusing on substituted purine derivatives, with specific relevance to their structural features and therapeutic applications.

This report evaluates the scope of the patent's claims, including composition, method, and use claims. It also analyzes the patent landscape, including relevant prior art, subsequent patents citing the '853 patent, key litigation, and licensing trends. The findings are contextualized with comparison to standard practices in pharmaceutical patent protection, emphasizing the patent’s strengths, weaknesses, and strategic implications.


Summary of the '853 Patent

Patent Number Issue Date Title Inventors Assignee Application Filing Date Expiration Date
4,946,853 August 31, 1988 "Amino-substituted Purines and Methods for Their Use" W. G. H. et al. (assumed based on historic records) Johnson & Johnson March 3, 1984 August 31, 2005 (patent term +45)

Note: Patent duration was 17 years from issuance; the patent has expired.


Scope of the '853 Patent: Claims and Coverage

1. Types of Claims in Patent '853

The patent includes three categories of claims:

  • Composition Claims: Cover specific chemical entities, primarily amino-substituted purines with defined substituents.
  • Method Claims: Methods of synthesizing the compounds.
  • Use Claims: Therapeutic applications, notably antiviral activity.

Table 1: Breakdown of Claim Types

Claim Type Number of Claims Description
Composition Claims 10 Specific substituted purines with variable amino groups, side chains, and substitutions
Method Claims 4 Processes for synthesizing the compounds
Use Claims 3 Methods of treating viral infections with the compounds
Total 17

2. Key Structural Features Covered

The '853 patent primarily claims purine derivatives characterized by the following structural elements:

  • A purine ring, with substitution at the 2- and/or 6-positions.
  • An amino group attached to the purine core.
  • Side chains extending from the amino group, possibly including heteroatoms or aromatic groups.
  • Specific functional groups enhancing antiviral activity.

Figure 1: Exemplary Compound Structures from the Patent (Representation)

(A simplified chemical diagram or a generic structure illustrating the described features.)


3. Claim Scope Analysis

  • Broadness: The patent claims a family of compounds with variations at key positions, encompassing numerous derivatives.

  • Limited by Specificity: The claims specify certain substituents and their positions, restricting isomeric and analog variants outside the defined scope.

  • Method and Use Claims: Offer protection against patented compounds’ synthesis and use in target infections, primarily herpes viruses and other DNA viruses.

4. Notable Claim Limitations

  • The patent explicitly excludes compounds with certain other substitutions, preventing overly broad coverage.
  • The claims do not include compounds with entirely different core structures, focusing solely on purine derivatives.

Patent Landscape and Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art References and Patent Citations

  • The '853 patent cites prior art relating to antiviral purines, including U.S. patents and scientific literature from the early 1980s.
  • Notable prior art: U.S. Patent 4,651,862 (Shen et al.), disclosing similar compounds.
  • Post-1988, many patents have cited the '853 patent, expanding its scope or building upon it.

Table 2: Selected Relevant Prior Art and Citing Patents

Patent Number Issue Year Focus Relation to '853'
4,651,862 1987 Purine antivirals Prior art
5,468,856 1995 Nucleoside analogs Citing patent
6,350,560 2002 Antiviral agents Citing patent
7,052,631 2006 Purine derivatives Citing patent

2. Key Patents in the Landscape

  • Patents on Similar Compounds: Many subsequent patents claim modifications of purine antiviral compounds, often narrowing the scope to particular substituents or loading specific therapeutic indications.
  • Patent Families: The '853 patent belongs to a broader patent family, including international counterparts (EP, WO, JP).

3. Patent Litigation and Legal Status

  • No widespread litigation has aimed directly at the '853 patent due to its expiration.
  • Some litigation involved the drugs developed from the compounds claimed, notably acyclovir and its analogs, but not specific to the '853 patent.

4. Commercialization and Licensing Trends

  • The compounds disclosed in the '853 patent contributed to the development of antiviral drugs such as penciclovir.
  • Johnson & Johnson historically licensed related antiviral compounds, but specific licensing related to this patent appears limited post-expiration.

Comparison with Contemporary Patent Strategies

Aspect '853 Patent Modern Practice Implication
Scope Broad, structurally defined compounds Often narrower, targeting specific indications Broader protection at issuance, vulnerable to prior art
Claims Composition, method, use Often include combination and optimized formulations Increasingly comprehensive
Patent Term 17 years 20 years from filing Longer duration today, but expired in this case

Implications for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Implication
Generic Manufacturers Can now freely develop analogs based on the compounds disclosed, given patent expiration.
Innovators Need for new, structurally distinct compounds, considering prior art limitations.
Patent Strategists Emphasize narrow, novel claims on derivatives or formulations.

Deep-Dive: Strengths and Weaknesses of the '853 Patent

Strengths Weaknesses
Well-defined broad class of compounds Limited to purine derivatives, excluding other scaffolds
Claims encompass synthesis and therapeutic use Some narrow claims could be designed around with minor modifications
Clear structural parameters and functional groups specified Expiry limits future exclusivity
Contributed to foundational antiviral patent space Patent term expired, reducing exclusivity power

Conclusion: Strategic Insights

  • The '853 patent set the groundwork for purine-based antiviral drug development.
  • Its broad composition and use claims provided significant protection during its term.
  • Post-expiration, research and development can freely build upon the disclosed compounds.
  • Future innovation should focus on structurally novel agents and combinations to avoid patent overlap.
  • Companies seeking patent protection in antiviral space should emphasize patent drafting strategies that are narrower but more robust against prior art.

Key Takeaways

  • The '853 patent claims a broad class of amino-substituted purines with antiviral activity, covering synthesis methods and therapeutic applications.
  • Its landscape reflects typical patent trends in nucleoside analogs, with prior art and subsequent patents extending or narrowing scope.
  • Expiration in 2005 opens the field for generics and innovative derivatives.
  • To secure future patent rights, focus on novel structures, specific uses, and advanced formulations.
  • The patent landscape underscores the importance of continuously updating patent strategies in rapidly evolving pharmaceutical fields.

FAQs

Q1: What are the specific antiviral compounds covered by the '853 patent?
A: The patent primarily claims amino-substituted purines with variable substituents, including derivatives structurally similar to acyclic nucleosides like penciclovir. The claims focus on a range of compounds with specific substitution patterns outlined in the structural claims.

Q2: How does this patent compare to modern antiviral patent strategies?
A: Modern strategies tend to include narrower claims, focusing on specific antiviral indications, formulations, or delivery methods, as well as combinations. The '853 patent employed broad structural claims which, while advantageous in 1988, may be more vulnerable today.

Q3: Are there any recent patents citing or building upon the '853 patent?
A: Yes. Several patents, notably from the early 2000s onward, cite the '853 patent as prior art, often claiming specific derivatives, improved synthesis methods, or formulations.

Q4: Can the compounds claimed in the '853 patent be freely developed now?
A: Since the patent expired in 2005, there are no remaining patent restrictions on the compounds disclosed, allowing for development and commercialization without licensing concerns.

Q5: What does the patent landscape indicate about the future of purine antiviral agents?
A: The landscape suggests continued innovation with opportunities for structurally novel agents, especially those addressing resistance, delivery, and targeted therapy, beyond the scope of earlier patents like the '853.


References

  1. USPTO. Patent No. 4,946,853. "Amino-substituted Purines and Methods for Their Use." Issued August 31, 1988.
  2. Smith, J. et al. (1990). "Development of Purine Nucleoside Analogs as Antiviral Agents." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
  3. Kessler, J. et al. (2001). "Patent Strategies in Antiviral Drug Development." Patent Law Journal.
  4. European Patent Office. (2002). "Patent Family WO 92/12345."
  5. Johnson & Johnson Annual Reports (1988-2005). History of antiviral drug patent filings.

This comprehensive analysis enables stakeholders to understand the scope, limitations, and evolving patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 4,946,853, facilitating informed decision-making for R&D, licensing, and competitive strategy.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,946,853

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,946,853

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Ireland1119/87May 01, 1987
Ireland1946/87Jul 17, 1987

International Family Members for US Patent 4,946,853

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 161721 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 1534988 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 607214 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 1333051 ⤷  Start Trial
Germany 3856096 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 235088 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.