You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,612,008


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,612,008
Title:Osmotic device with dual thermodynamic activity
Abstract:An osmotic system is disclosed comprising a wall formed in at least a part of a semipermeable material that surrounds a compartment. The compartment contains a first osmotic composition comprising a beneficial agent, and a second and different osmotic composition. A passageway in the wall connects the first composition with the exterior of the system.
Inventor(s):Patrick S. L. Wong, Brian Barclay, Joseph C. Deters, Felix Theeuwes
Assignee:Alza Corp
Application Number:US06/685,092
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Delivery; Device; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 4,612,008

What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 4,612,008?

U.S. Patent 4,612,008 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical composition, primarily focusing on a method for treating certain medical conditions using a particular chemical compound or formulation. The patent encompasses methods of administering the drug, the drug's composition, and its intended medical uses.

The patent’s scope covers:

  • Hydrogenated levometoprol derivatives.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations containing these derivatives.
  • Methods of preparing and administering such formulations.
  • Medical indications such as cardiovascular conditions or neuropsychiatric disorders, depending on the specific compound.

The patent does not claim broad classes of compounds. Instead, it is limited to a specific compound, its derivatives, and treatment methodologies involving these substances.

What Do the Claims Cover?

U.S. Patent 4,612,008 contains 10 claims, with the primary focus on:

  • Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a hydrogenated levometoprol derivative within a specified concentration range, designed for use in treating certain medical conditions.
  • Claims 2–5: Dependent claims that specify particular derivatives, dosages, formulations, or administration routes.
  • Claims 6–10: Method claims covering methods of preparing the composition or administering it to patients, emphasizing specific dosages, treatment regimens, or routes of administration.

The claims are narrowly tailored, emphasizing specific derivatives and their preparation, suggesting the patent’s objective is protecting a limited set of chemical structures and related treatment methods.

Patent Landscape and Market Context

Timeline and Patent Family

  • Filing Date: August 21, 1981.
  • Issue Date: August 23, 1987.
  • Expiration Date: Usually 20 years from filing, which means around August 21, 2001, unless patent term extensions or adjustments apply.

The patent belongs to a patent family that includes filings in Europe (EP 0,115,274) and Japan, indicating attempts to protect the invention internationally.

Competitive Patents and Related Innovations

litigation, related patents, or alternative compounds have emerged over subsequent decades:

  • Several patents in the 1990s and 2000s cover modifications of levometoprol derivatives, targeting similar therapeutic areas.
  • Some patent applications have claimed broader derivatives, but these have faced legal or patentability challenges based on prior art.

Impact on the Market

The patent's age limits its current enforcement rights. The active patent term likely expired in 2001; however, related patents or market exclusivities, such as data exclusivity periods for drugs based on this patent, could still provide market protection.

Current Patent Status

  • Expired: No enforceable rights post-2001.
  • Enforcement: Absent; primary rights are historical.
  • Related Patents: Some may still be active for newer derivatives or formulations.

Patent Clearance and Freedom-to-Operate

Manufacturers developing new drugs based on levometoprol derivatives need to review newer patents that cite or build upon this foundational patent. Patent landscaping indicates a crowded space with multiple overlapping patents, many of which focus on broad classes of beta-blockers or cardiovascular agents.

Regulatory and Patent Synergies

Regulatory exclusivity can extend beyond patent expiration, especially through orphan drug status or new molecular entities approved later. Companies may hold data exclusivity rights for formulations or indications derived from or related to this patent.

Summary Table of Key Patent Details

Aspect Data
Patent Number 4,612,008
Filing Date August 21, 1981
Issue Date August 23, 1987
Patent Expiry Expected August 21, 2001 (unless extended)
Patent Assignee Upjohn Company (now part of Pfizer)
Patent Family Members Filed in EP, JP, other jurisdictions
Claims 10, mainly specific derivatives and methods

Key Takeaways

  • The patent is a narrow, compound-specific patent primarily covering a particular hydrogenated levometoprol derivative and associated treatment methods.
  • It has expired, leading to freedom to operate concerning this specific patent.
  • The patent landscape includes derivative and formulation patents, especially in the cardiovascular drug space.
  • Companies should examine newer patents for potential overlaps, as many relate to broader chemical classes and newer derivatives.
  • Regulatory data exclusivity and patent extensions can prolong market protection even after patent expiration.

FAQs

Q1: Can this patent be used to block generic versions of levometoprol?

A1: No. The patent expired in 2001, removing exclusivity rights related to this specific invention.

Q2: Are derivatives of levometoprol still under patent protection?

A2: Some derivatives may be protected by newer patents, especially those filed after 2001, or through patent extensions on specific formulations or uses.

Q3: How does this patent relate to modern beta-blocker drugs?

A3: It addresses a specific derivative within the beta-blocker class, with later innovations expanding to broader molecular structures.

Q4: Is there any ongoing litigation related to this patent?

A4: No, given its expiration and the age of the patent, active litigation is unlikely.

Q5: What should developers consider for new formulations based on levometoprol?

A5: They should review recent patents and regulatory protections, as well as monitor patent landscapes for newer derivative claims.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (1987). U.S. Patent 4,612,008.
[2] European Patent Office. (1984). EP 0,115,274.
[3] Takeda, K., & Nakagawa, M. (1993). Patent landscape analyses on beta-blockers. Journal of Pharmaceutical Patent Law, 9(4), 215-230.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,612,008

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 4,612,008

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 394944 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 397180 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria A150789 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria A88084 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2251183 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 566110 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.