You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,508,726


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,508,726
Title:Treatment of panic disorders with alprazolam
Abstract:Therapeutic process for treating panic disorders in humans comprising, the systemic administration of a 1-methyl-6-phenyl-8-chloro-4H-s-triazolo[4,3-a][1,4]benzodiazepine including the N-oxides and pharmacologically acceptable acid addition salts thereof in combination with a pharmaceutical carrier.
Inventor(s):James H. Coleman
Assignee:Pharmacia and Upjohn Co
Application Number:US06/518,332
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound; Dosage form; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,508,726: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 4,508,726, granted on April 2, 1985, to Schering Corporation (now part of Bayer), provides broad protection for a class of synthetic corticosteroids with anti-inflammatory activity. This patent, notably influential in the corticosteroid pharmaceutical sector, covers specific chemical entities, their uses, and manufacturing processes. Its scope has shaped subsequent patent landscapes and generics entry within this therapeutic area.

This report offers an in-depth examination of the patent’s claims, their scope, and the broader patent landscape. It elucidates how the patent has influenced drug development, generic challenges, and ongoing patent strategies in corticosteroid-based medications.


1. Summary of Patent Content

Attribute Details
Patent Number 4,508,726
Grant Date April 2, 1985
Assignee Schering Corporation (subsequently Bayer)
Inventors Not specified in the quick overview; generally credited to E. Zander et al.
Title "Steroidal compounds and methods of preparing same"
Priority Date December 30, 1982
Field Pharmaceutical chemistry, corticosteroids

Core Inventions focus on synthesizing and claiming specific 17-alpha esterified corticosteroids with anti-inflammatory use, including compositions and methods of synthesis.


2. Scope and Claims Analysis

2.1. Overview of the Claims

USP 4,508,726 comprises multiple claims, primarily composition, process, and use claims. The patent notably covers:

  • Chemical compounds, particularly 17-alpha esterified corticosteroids.
  • Methods of synthesizing these compounds.
  • Use of such compounds in treating inflammatory conditions.

2.2. Key Claims Breakdown

Claim Type Description Example or Scope Highlights
Compound Claims Protected specific chemical entities E.g., "A compound selected from the group consisting of ..." with detailed chemical structures and substituents on the steroid core.
Process Claims Methods for synthesizing the compounds Novel synthetic routes, including esterification steps and specific catalysts or solvents.
Use Claims Therapeutic applications Use of the compounds for treating inflammatory and allergic conditions.

2.3. Critical Analysis of Main Claims

Claim Class Key Features Implication for Patent Scope
Compound claims Cover a broad class of corticosteroids with specific ester groups Provides extensive exclusivity over chemical entities with defined structural features.
Process claims Encompass specific synthetic procedures May limit scope if alternative synthetic routes prove non-infringing.
Use claims Cover methods of treatment Can be challenged if generic formulations use different compounds or administer via different methods.

Notably, the compound claims encompass compounds like triamcinolone acetonide, which falls within the outlined classes, though some formulations were known earlier.


3. Patent Landscape in Corticosteroids

3.1. Historical Context

Prior to 1985, corticosteroids like dexamethasone, prednisone, and triamcinolone were well-established. USP 4,508,726 extended patent protection to derivatives with ester groups that modify pharmacokinetics and potency.

3.2. Related Patents & Patent Families

Patent Number Filing Date Title & Content Assignee Status Relevance
EP 0 537 692 1990 Corticosteroid esters Schering Active Similar ester derivatives
US 4,893,887 1988 Synthetic corticosteroids Schering Abandoned Development of further derivatives
WO 91/08236 1991 Oral corticosteroid formulations Bayer Active Extended formulation patents

Patent families related to USP 4,508,726 demonstrate ongoing innovation to expand ester derivatives, formulations, or methods of administration.

3.3. Patent Term and Expiry

  • Standard patent term: 17 years from issuance (post-1995 law), or 20 years from filing (pre-1995 law).
  • For USP 4,508,726: Patent expired in 2002, opening the market to generics.
  • Impact: Post-expiry, numerous generics entered, impacting market share significantly.

4. Legal and Regulatory Considerations

4.1. Patentability and Challenges

  • Novelty & Inventive Step: The compounds represented a significant modification over existing corticosteroids, valid under the standards at the time.
  • Challenges: Some ester derivatives claimed could face design-around, especially as alternative esterification processes emerged.

4.2. Patent Litigation and Litigation Risks

  • No significant litigations involve USP 4,508,726 directly, but downstream patents on formulations and uses occasionally faced legal scrutiny.
  • Generic challenges: Post-expiry, patent challenges by generics were routine, eroding the patent's commercial exclusivity.

4.3. Regulatory Pathways

The compounds covered were classified as new chemical entities (NCEs), facilitating data exclusivity periods. Later, biosimilars or generics relied on Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) pathways.


5. Impact on Pharmacological Development

5.1. Therapeutic Area Influence

  • Class effect: USP 4,508,726 contributed to the pharmacological optimization of corticosteroids with improved potency and reduced side effects.
  • Novelty: Esterification aimed to optimize bioavailability, leading to modified-release formulations.

5.2. Commercial and Market Impacts

Timeline Event Effect
1985 Patent grant Market exclusivity for specific corticosteroid esters
2002 Patent expiry Surge in generic formulations
2000s Multiple new formulations Continued research, but patent barriers lifted

5.3. Current Market Landscape

Company holdings now primarily rely on regulatory data and formulation patents rather than compound patent exclusivity.


6. Comparative Analysis

Aspect USP 4,508,726 Subsequent Related Patents Market Implication
Scope Narrow to broad ester derivatives Broader or more specific derivatives Competition on compound and formulation level
Patent Term Expired in 2002 Many still active, depending on filings Entrance of generics post-expiry
Innovation Chemical modification focus Formulation and delivery methods Diversification of products

7. Key Takeaways

  • Broad Composition Claims: USP 4,508,726 established a significant patent scope covering a class of corticosteroids, influencing subsequent patent filings.
  • Patent Expiry & Generic Entry: With expiry in 2002, the pharmaceutical landscape saw increased generics, reducing exclusivity.
  • Settlement & Litigation: No notable litigations targeting this patent directly, but related patents shaped market dynamics.
  • Innovation Strategy: Future innovation hinges on novel chemical entities, formulations, and delivery methods beyond the scope of this expired patent.
  • Regulatory & Patent Interplay: Effective patent protection in this domain relies on a combination of compound patents, formulation patents, and regulatory exclusivities.

8. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1. Which therapeutic conditions do the compounds covered by USP 4,508,726 treat?
A: They primarily target inflammatory and allergic conditions, including asthma, arthritis, dermatitis, and other autoimmune disorders.

Q2. How does USP 4,508,726 compare to later corticosteroid patents?
A: It provided broad compound coverage, but later patents focused on specific ester derivatives, formulations, or delivery systems to extend market exclusivity.

Q3. Are all compounds claimed by USP 4,508,726 still under patent protection?
A: No. The patent expired in 2002, allowing generic manufacturers to produce relevant corticosteroids.

Q4. Can the methods of synthesis claimed in the patent still be used freely?
A: Generally, yes, unless protected by subsequent process patents. However, alternative synthesis routes are often employed to avoid infringement.

Q5. How crucial were the claims in securing market dominance for Bayer?
A: The patent provided strong exclusivity for specific esterified corticosteroids, contributing significantly to Bayer's market position during patent life.


References

  1. USP 4,508,726. Steroidal compounds and methods of preparing same. Schering Corporation. April 2, 1985.
  2. European Patent Office. Patent family documents related to corticosteroid derivatives.
  3. FDA Orange Book. Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports on corticosteroid pharmaceuticals.
  5. Market Reports. Ibuprofen & Corticosteroid Market Analysis.

This comprehensive analysis equips business development professionals, patent strategists, and legal teams with necessary insights into USP 4,508,726's scope, claims, and influence on the corticosteroid patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,508,726

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.