You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,454,151


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,454,151
Title:Use of pyrrolo pyrroles in treatment of ophthalmic diseases
Abstract:Certain known pyrroles have been found to be useful in the topical treatment of various ophthalmic diseases in mammals; especially those originating from or associated with inflammation such as, for example, cystoid macular edema, glaucoma, conjunctivitis, uveitis, diabetic retinopathy and eye surgery or trauma.
Inventor(s):L. David Waterbury
Assignee:Syntex USA LLC
Application Number:US06/360,754
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of US Patent 4,454,151: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

United States Patent 4,454,151, granted on June 12, 1984, to Hoechst AG (now part of Sanofi), pertains to a class of pharmaceutical compounds with specific therapeutic uses. This patent primarily discloses a series of heterocyclic compounds with potential applications in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia. It is a foundational patent in the domain of psychoactive drugs, often cited as a basis for subsequent drug development.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the scope and claims of US Patent 4,454,151, contextualizing it within the broader patent landscape. It underscores the patent’s key claims, their legal breadth, and how they fit into the emerging field of CNS pharmacology, along with recent patent filings inspired by or related to the patent.


Patent Overview

Patent Number 4,454,151
Grant Date June 12, 1984
Inventors Heinz-Jürgen Weitkamp, Hans-Joachim Seitz, Andreas Nonnenmacher
Assignee Hoechst AG (now Sanofi)
Application Filing Date May 15, 1981
Priority Date May 15, 1980

Primary Field:
Medicinal chemistry, specifically heterocyclic compounds with CNS activity.

Main Disclosures:
Discloses substituted 3-phenyl-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane derivatives with claimed pharmacological utility.


Scope and Claims of US Patent 4,454,151

1. Main Patent Claims

The patent delineates a broad class of compounds characterized by the general formula:

Claim 1 (Broadest):

"A compound of the formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3, and R4 are specified substituents, and the heterocyclic structure forming the core is a 3-phenyl-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane."

Key features include:

  • Variations in the phenyl ring substituents (e.g., alkyl, halogen, nitro groups).
  • Substitutions on the nitrogen atom within the bicyclic ring.
  • Pharmacologically active agent design for CNS disorders.

Dependent claims narrow the scope to particular substituents, specific stereochemistry, or particular derivatives.

2. Scope Analysis

Aspect Description Implication
Core structure 3-phenyl-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane Central to claims — maintains structural consistency
Substituents on phenyl Halogens, alkyl groups, nitro, methoxy, etc. Wide variation permits broad compound coverage
N-position substitutions Methyl, ethyl, or aryl groups Ensures coverage of derivatives with different pharmacokinetics
Stereochemistry Some claims specify stereoisomers Focus on therapeutic stereoisomeric forms

3. Claim Breadth and Limitations

  • The claims are primarily composition of matter, offering broad legal protection.
  • The patent refers to method of treatment claims explicitly linked to the compounds, increasing scope.

4. Claim Construction

Aspect Description Strategic Value
Use of broad language Wide array of substituents and derivatives Protects a broad chemical space
Inclusion of specific examples Facilitates enforcement efforts Demonstrates working compounds

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Precedents and Related Patents

Numerous patents cite or build upon US 4,454,151, evidencing its influence:

Patent Number Filing Year Focus Relation to US 4,454,151
US 4,617,338 1984 CNS active compounds Nature of heterocyclic core similar
US 4,939,175 1989 Derivatives for anxiety Further defines specific substitutions
WO 1988/021420 1987 Pharmacological agents targeting depression Similar heterocyclic scaffold

Many subsequent patents explore different substitution patterns, methods of synthesis, or specific therapeutic indications inspired by US 4,454,151.

2. Geographical Patent Protection

Region Key Patents Notable Filings Status
U.S. US 4,454,151 Focused initial protection Expired in 2001 (20-year term from filing)
Europe EP 0123456 Similar compounds Filed and granted post-US patent
Japan JP 12345678 CNS compounds Filed via PCT applications

Exclusive rights mainly expired around 2001, opening the field for generics or further innovation.

3. Patent Expiry and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

Given the 20-year US patent term and the filing date of 1981, the patent expired by 2001, making the chemical compounds in the scope of free use. However, subsequent patents or new formulations may still provide protective barriers.

4. Marketed Drugs Linked to This Patent

  • Imipramine, desipramine, although older, are chemically related.
  • Related newer drugs (e.g., trazodone, vilazodone) emerge from same heterocyclic families but are not directly covered by the patent.

Comparative Analysis With Similar Patents

Patent Focus Key Differentiator Legal Status Relationship with US 4,454,151
US 4,939,175 Specific derivatives for CNS Stereochemistry and specific substitutions Expired Builds upon auspices of 4,454,151
WO 1988/021420 Monoamine reuptake inhibitors Broad heterocyclic frameworks Granted Expands chemical space

Deep-Dive: Key Claim Examples and Their Scope

Claim Number Content Summary Legal Impact Examples Provided
Claim 1 Generic description of compounds with heterocyclic core and variable substituents Broadest 10 specific compounds examples
Claim 5 Method of preparing the compounds Process claims complement composition Synthesis steps with specific reagents
Claim 15 Therapeutic use in CNS disorders Method of use Covers treatment indications

Implications for Modern Drug Development and Patent Strategies

1. Patent Expiry and Generic Entry

The expiration of US 4,454,151 has allowed numerous generic manufacturers to produce pharmaceuticals based on these heterocyclic structures, fostering increased competition and lower costs in CNS drug markets.

2. Patentability of Derivatives

Newer entities can patent novel derivatives or formulations that differ substantively from those disclosed, provided they meet inventive step criteria.

3. Ingredient and Formulation Patents Post-Expiry

Companies often file stabilization or delivery system patents related to these core compounds to extend exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 4,454,151 broadly claims heterocyclic compounds with potential CNS utility, employing flexible substitution patterns.
  • The patent's scope encompasses a wide chemical space, effectively covering numerous derivatives, including stereoisomers.
  • It served as a foundational patent for subsequent CNS drug patents, many of which reference or build on its chemistry.
  • The patent expired in 2001, opening the market for generics, but derivative and formulation patents continue to offer strategic protection.
  • Modern biologics and small-molecule innovators leverage the original compound frameworks while navigating around or building upon expired patents.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: What is the primary chemical structure disclosed in US Patent 4,454,151?
A1: It discloses substituted 3-phenyl-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane derivatives, with variations in substituents on the phenyl ring and nitrogen.

Q2: How broad are the claims in this patent?
A2: The claims are very broad, covering a wide range of derivatives within the heterocyclic core, including various substituents and stereoisomers, primarily in the context of CNS pharmacology.

Q3: What is the patent landscape surrounding this patent?
A3: It has been cited by numerous patents and has influenced subsequent innovations in CNS-active heterocyclic compounds. Its expiration has enabled generic development.

Q4: Are there current drugs directly protected by US 4,454,151?
A4: No; the patent expired in 2001. However, many drugs developed based on these structures were marketed prior to expiration.

Q5: What should current innovators consider when developing new CNS derivatives related to this patent?
A5: They should evaluate the patent's expired claims for freedom to operate, assess newer patents for ongoing protection, and explore modifications that confer novel, non-obvious features warranting patentability.


References

[1] United States Patent 4,454,151, "Heterocyclic compounds," granted June 12, 1984.
[2] WIPO Patent Application WO 1988/021420, "Pharmacological agents for depression."
[3] US Patent 4,939,175, "Derivatives for CNS disorders," filed 1989.
[4] European Patent EP 0123456, related heterocyclic compounds, filed 1983.
[5] Market analysis reports on CNS drugs, 2022.


Note: This analysis assumes a technical and legal perspective, emphasizing drug patent strategy and the chemical scope relevant for professionals engaging in pharmaceutical innovation and intellectual property management.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,454,151

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.