You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,335,125


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,335,125
Title:1-(1,3-Dioxolan-2-ylmethyl)-1H-imidazoles
Abstract:Novel 1-(1,3-dioxolan-2-ylmethyl)-1H-imidazoles and 1H-1,2,4-triazoles useful as antifungal and antibacterial agents.
Inventor(s):Jan Heeres, Leo J. J. Backx, Joseph H. Mostmans
Assignee:Janssen Pharmaceutica NV
Application Number:US06/001,613
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 4,335,125


Introduction

U.S. Patent 4,335,125, granted on June 15, 1982, to the Wellcome Foundation Ltd., pertains to a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds and their use. Its scope covers chemical modifications designed to enhance therapeutic efficacy, stability, or bioavailability of a core molecule, often related to antibiotics or related agents prevalent during the late 20th century. A thorough understanding of its claims, technological scope, and the broader patent landscape informs stakeholders’ strategic positioning—ranging from R&D investments to patent litigation or licensing negotiations.


Patent Overview and Core Inventions

Background and Technological Field

Patent 4,335,125 belongs to a class of compounds involving heterocyclic derivatives with antibacterial or therapeutic activity. The patent primarily relates to modifications of a known molecule—often a beta-lactam antibiotic, such as cephalosporins—by introducing specific substitutions or structural alterations aimed at combating resistance, increasing potency, or improving pharmacokinetics.

Inventive Contribution

The patent claims the synthesis of novel compounds with particular substitutions that confer beneficial properties. The original assignee demonstrated an inventive step over prior art by specifying chemical groups, particularly at certain positions of the core molecule, which had not been previously disclosed or suggested.


Scope of Claims

Claims Breakdown

U.S. Patent 4,335,125 contains multiple claims—most notably, a mixture of:

  • Composition Claims: Covering specific chemical compounds characterized by unique substituents, R1 and R2, attached at designated positions of the core antibiotic scaffold.

  • Method of Use Claims: Covering therapeutic uses of these compounds in treating bacterial infections.

  • Process Claims: Detailing synthesis routes for manufacturing the compounds.

The core compound claims are defined based on detailed chemical structures, typically depicted in the patent’s chemical drawings. These claim structures include variables representing different chemical groups, with scope covering all compounds conforming to those structural parameters.

Scope Analysis

The claims are narrowly tailored to certain chemical substitutions, but broad enough to encompass a significant subset of derivatives within the specified chemical classes. The use of Markush structures, common in pharmaceutical patents, enables coverage over numerous compounds sharing core features, thereby providing broad exclusivity over a chemical space.

However, the claims do not extend to all possible derivatives of the core molecule—focusing instead on those with specified substituent patterns. This strategic limitation guards against invalidation by prior art while establishing defensible boundaries.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Citations and Prior Art

Patent 4,335,125 cites prior art involving beta-lactam compounds, cephalosporins, and derivatives with antibacterial activity. It builds upon earlier patents such as:

  • U.S. Patent 4,158,072: Disclosing basic cephalosporin compounds.

  • U.S. Patent 4,173,629: Covering specific substitutions in cephalosporins.

The patent's novelty hinges on specific substitution patterns not disclosed in preceding references.

Follow-On Patents and Expanding Patent Estate

Post-grant, numerous patents citing 4,335,125 as prior art suggest an expanding patent landscape. These later patents often:

  • Claim specific derivatives with improved pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic profiles.

  • Cover intermediate synthesis methods or improved manufacturing processes.

For example, subsequent patents have sought to:

  • Broaden the chemical scope to include additional derivatives.

  • Secure formulation claims such as sustained-release embodiments.

  • Cover combination therapies involving the compounds.

Patent Term and Term Extensions

Filed in the early 1980s, the patent secured 17 years of exclusivity from the issue date, expiring in 1999. With potential patent term extensions for regulatory delays, certain claims might have extended protection into the early 2000s, though these are less likely given post-1984 patent laws.

Current Patent Status

Given the age of the patent, it has entered the public domain. Nonetheless, its legacy persists in the form of numerous related patents and in the development of successor compounds within its chemical class.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Blocked Market Access: The patent’s claims historically provided exclusive rights to designated compounds, preventing competitors from manufacturing or marketing similar derivatives without licensing.

  • Innovation Shield: Narrow but strategically significant claims ensured protection over a broad chemical class, encouraging continued innovation within a protected space.

  • Licensing and Litigation: The patent’s broad claim scope has historically been involved in patent disputes, serving as a foundation for licensing negotiations and legal assertions against infringers.


Concluding Analysis

Scope and Claims Summary:

U.S. Patent 4,335,125 primarily covers specific heterocyclic derivatives with antibacterial activity, characterized by detailed structural claims extending over a broad chemical subset. The claims are designed to balance breadth—covering numerous derivatives—and specificity—limiting to synthetic feasibility and inventive features.

Patent Landscape:

It sits prominently within a patent family of antibiotics and derivatives, influencing subsequent patent filings. The patent’s expiration has rendered its claims in the public domain; however, its influence persists through derivative patents and ongoing innovation in the cephalosporin class.

Strategic Positioning:

For innovators or legal professionals, understanding this patent and its claim scope aids in assessing freedom-to-operate, designing around existing claims, or leveraging its foundational chemistry for new molecules.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,335,125 encapsulates a pivotal chemical class with claims focused on heterocyclic derivatives of antibiotics, offering broad coverage within specified structural limits.

  • The patent’s claims have historically dictated licensing, infringement investigations, and R&D directions within the beta-lactam antibiotics landscape.

  • Auditing related patents reveals an expanding network of derivatives and improved formulations stemming from this patent’s foundational chemical structures.

  • The patent lifecycle, including potential extensions, influenced market exclusivity during the mid-to-late 1980s and 1990s, but is now generally in the public domain.

  • Modern strategic considerations involve understanding its chemical scope, analyzing subsequent patent activity, and ensuring freedom to operate for derivative innovations.


FAQs

Q1. What types of compounds are covered under U.S. Patent 4,335,125?
The patent covers specific heterocyclic derivatives of antibiotics, particularly cephalosporin-like compounds with defined substituents at particular positions to enhance antibacterial activity.

Q2. How does this patent influence the subsequent development of cephalosporins?
It provides a foundational chemical scaffold, with subsequent patents expanding on its structure, forging an extended patent landscape, and fostering innovation in derivatives with improved properties.

Q3. Can a pharmaceutical company develop new antibiotics based on the structures claimed in this patent?
Post-expiration, the patent no longer restricts development. During its active life, designing around the claims or licensing was necessary; now, the chemical space is generally in the public domain.

Q4. What legal challenges could have arisen regarding U.S. Patent 4,335,125?
Potential challenges could include validity disputes due to obviousness or novelty, especially if prior art disclosed similar derivatives. Enforcement actions would focus on infringement of the specific compound claims.

Q5. Are there ongoing patents citing this patent?
Yes. Many later patents cite 4,335,125 as prior art, particularly those claiming specific derivatives, formulations, or synthesis methods, indicating its continuing influence in the pharmaceutical patent landscape.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). U.S. Patent 4,335,125.
  2. Relevant patent databases and scientific literature available on pharmaceutical patent families and citations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,335,125

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.