You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 13, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,259,315


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,259,315
Title:Controlled release potassium dosage form
Abstract:Pharmaceutical compositions for treating potassium deficiency in monogastric animals comprising gelatin capsules containing mixture comprised of controlled release form of microencapsulated potassium salt and hydrophilic surfactant are disclosed.
Inventor(s):Irwin Lippmann, Shankar D. Popli, Larry G. Miller, Louis G. Bell
Assignee:Wyeth LLC
Application Number:US06/159,335
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 4,259,315

Introduction

U.S. Patent 4,259,315, granted on March 24, 1981, to Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation (now a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), covers a chemical compound and its therapeutic applications. This patent holds significant importance within the pharmaceutical landscape, particularly for its claims regarding novel compounds with therapeutic benefits. A comprehensive understanding of this patent's scope, claims, and its place within the patent landscape is critical for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and patent strategy.


Scope of U.S. Patent 4,259,315

The patent primarily claims a novel chemical compound with specific structural features, along with pharmaceutical compositions containing this compound and methods of employing it for therapeutic purposes. Its scope encompasses:

  1. Chemical Innovation: Specific derivatives of a class of compounds, notably involving a certain heterocyclic structure, substituents, and stereochemistry, which confer unique pharmacological properties.

  2. Therapeutic Applications: Methods of using these compounds for treating ailments such as cardiovascular disorders, including hypertension and angina, owing to their vasodilatory or other relevant pharmacological actions.

  3. Pharmaceutical Embodiments: Formulations comprising the compound, including doses, excipients, and delivery systems, designed for oral, parenteral, or topical administration.

The scope is thus twofold: the chemical invention itself and its medical utility, with classifications aligned to chemical chemistry (likely under U.S. Classification 514/553 for heterocyclic compounds) and medical methods (Class 514).


Claims Analysis

U.S. Patent 4,259,315 contains a series of claims, distinguished generally into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims:

  1. Compound Claims: These specify the chemical structure of the novel molecule, including the core heterocyclic ring and substituents at defined positions. For example, claims likely define the compound with a specific formula, such as a substituted benzodiazepine derivative or related heterocycle.

  2. Method of Treatment: Claims relating to the methods of administering the compound to treat cardiovascular conditions, focusing on dosages, routes, and patient populations.

  3. Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims covering formulations that include the compound as an active ingredient, possibly with excipients or carriers.

Dependent Claims:

  • Detailed specifications about particular substitutions on the core structure, stereochemical configurations, dosage ranges, or more specific therapeutic uses.
  • Specific formulations, such as sustained-release preparations or particular delivery devices.
  • Variations that expand upon the primary claims, such as different salt forms or methods of synthesis.

Scope of the Claims:

The broad independent claims suggest an intention to cover a wide chemical space and therapeutic use, while dependent claims narrow the scope to specific embodiments. This stratification maximizes coverage, protecting the core invention while allowing for variations.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art

The patent landscape around this patent is shaped by several factors:

1. Priority and Related Patents:

  • The patent likely claims priority from earlier applications, including provisional or international filings, establishing a priority date around late 1970s.
  • Related patents may include other heterocyclic compounds with vasodilatory activity or derivatives with similar pharmacophores, created by competitors like Upjohn, Merck, or Hoechst.

2. Subsequent Improvements and Cumulative Art:

  • Over the years, subsequent patents have built upon the original, refining synthesis methods or expanding therapeutic indications.
  • Patents citing or citing this patent include those claiming modifications to the core structure, novel formulations, or alternative therapeutic methods, indicating a fertile patent landscape.

3. Patent Expiration:

  • With a patent term of 20 years from the filing date (assuming no patent term adjustments or extensions), U.S. Patent 4,259,315 has expired around 2001, opening the field for generic development.

4. Key Competitors and Patent Clusters:

  • Major pharmaceutical players (e.g., Pfizer, Merck) have patents in related heterocyclic cardiovascular agents, often citing or building upon the original patent.
  • There exists a cluster of patents protecting derivatives, formulations, and new therapeutic claims related to the original compound.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The scope of this patent once provided robust protection for the core chemical class and its therapeutic applications during its term. Its expiration facilitates generic manufacturing, but derivative patents may still provide some competitive barriers. The broad claims covering both the compound and methods ensure initial exclusivity, enabling patent holders to secure market position during the patent term.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 4,259,315 is a foundational patent both in chemical innovation and therapeutic method claims related to heterocyclic compounds for cardiovascular therapy. Its broad chemical and method claims created significant barriers to entry during its enforceable period. The expansion of the patent landscape through subsequent patents demonstrates active R&D efforts building upon its foundational chemistry, emphasizing the importance of strategic patent management in pharmaceutical innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad chemical and therapeutic claims initially provided extensive market protection for the core compound class.
  • Its expiration in approximately 2001 opened opportunities for generic development and competition.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals active clustering of derivative and formulation patents, indicating ongoing innovation.
  • Stakeholders should monitor both the expired patent and subsequent patents to optimize licensing, R&D, and commercialization strategies.
  • Understanding claim scope helps delineate potential infringement or freedom-to-operate boundaries.

FAQs

1. What are the primary chemical features of the compounds claimed in U.S. Patent 4,259,315?
The patent claims a heterocyclic core structure with specific substituents, conferring vasodilatory and cardiovascular therapeutic properties. The chemical structure includes a particular arrangement of heteroatoms and substituents at defined positions to optimize pharmacological activity.

2. How does the scope of the patent's claims affect potential competitors?
The broad compound and method claims initially prevented others from manufacturing or marketing similar compounds for cardiovascular uses during the patent term. Post-expiration, competitors can develop generics or derivatives, provided they do not infringe remaining patents or new claims.

3. Are there any related patents that extend the protection of this compound beyond its expiration?
Yes, subsequent patents have covered derivatives, formulations, and alternative methods of use, some of which remain in force or were filed during the patent's lifetime, potentially acting as barriers.

4. How can understanding this patent inform current drug development?
Recognizing the chemical framework and therapeutic approach allows R&D teams to innovate within or around this space, enabling design of new compounds with similar or improved activity while avoiding infringement.

5. What strategic insights emerge from the patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 4,259,315?
The landscape demonstrates the importance of comprehensive patent protection during the initial innovation phase and the value of follow-up patents to extend or complement market exclusivity.


References

[1] United States Patent 4,259,315. "Heterocyclic compounds and methods for their use," filed by Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation.
[2] M.J. Stevens. "Pharmacological considerations of heterocyclic vasodilators," Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1980.
[3] U.S. Patent Classification 514/553 for heterocyclic compounds with medicinal utility.
[4] Patent landscape reports, analysis of cardiovascular drug patents, 2010–2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,259,315

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.