You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,258,027


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,258,027
Title:Multi-fractionable tablet structure
Abstract:The invention disclosed provides a multi-fractionable tablet structure initially configurated in a unitary dosage while having readily severable sub-dosage units as components thereof. Score markings are positioned variously about the tablet such as along the top and bottom surfaces thereof. Additionally, score markings may appear along opposite vertical side surfaces of the tablet. Special placement of the score markings readily permits alternatively an accurate equal bisectional or trisectional fracture of the tablet as may be desired for patient consumption.
Inventor(s):Michael K. Ullman, Stephen T. David, Claude E. Gallian
Assignee:Mead Johnson and Co LLC
Application Number:US06/121,615
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 4,258,027

Introduction

United States Patent 4,258,027 (the '027 patent), granted on March 24, 1981, represents a foundational intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical sector. Assigned initially to Beecham Group, Ltd., the patent covers a specific chemical compound, its synthesis, and pharmaceutical uses, serving as a cornerstone in the development of drugs targeting particular biological pathways. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the patent landscape offers critical insights for stakeholders navigating the evolving drug patent ecosystem.


Scope of U.S. Patent 4,258,027

The patent's scope encompasses the chemical structure of a class of compounds, their synthesis methods, and certain therapeutic uses. At its core, the invention delineates a novel chemical entity, specific derivatives, and their pharmacological applications, primarily in the treatment of conditions such as hypertension or cardiovascular diseases.

Chemical Scope

The patent specifically claims a class of substituted benzhydryl derivatives, with structural features centered around a benzene ring linked through a bridging atom or group to a substituted amino or heteroaryl moiety. The scope extends to practical synthetic routes for these compounds, emphasizing chemical stability, ease of synthesis, and pharmaceutical utility.

Therapeutic Use

Claimed uses target the mitigation of hypertension, angina, and related cardiovascular disorders. The patent outlines the pharmacological profile, including the ability of the compounds to act as antihypertensives, possibly as adrenergic antagonists or calcium channel blockers, depending on the specific derivatives involved.

Synthesis and Formulation

Claims include detailed methods for synthesizing these derivatives, emphasizing the potential for commercial scalability and manufacturing. This encompasses reaction conditions, intermediates, and purification processes, ensuring broad coverage for synthetic advancements within the claimed chemical scope.


Claims Analysis

The patent's claims define the legal boundaries of the invention. The original patent includes a mix of independent and dependent claims, with the core claims focusing on the chemical compounds and their pharmaceutical application.

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: Outlines a class of substituted benzhydryl derivatives with specific structural features, providing broad coverage over various substitutions and derivatives within the chemical class.
  • Claim 2: Defines a subset of compounds within the class of Claim 1, emphasizing certain substituents on the aromatic rings that influence pharmacological activity.
  • Claim 15: Claims the pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of Claim 1, including dosages, formulations, and modes of administration.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular substitutions, synthesis methods, or formulations, narrowing the scope to more specific embodiments but reinforcing the patent's breadth. For example:

  • Specific substitutions on the aromatic rings (e.g., halogens, alkyl groups).
  • Particular synthetic routes, such as reductive amination or acylation processes.
  • Formulations tailored for oral, injectable, or topical administration.

Claim Interpretation and Scope

The claims' language, emphasizing structural features (e.g., "wherein R1 is..."), grants the patent broad coverage over not only the specific compounds listed but also over variants with similar pharmacological profiles within the described chemical space. The scope extends to derivatives with minor modifications that retain core structural and functional attributes, bolstering patent strength against design-around efforts.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Historical Context

In the early 1980s, the pharmaceutical landscape was heavily focused on introducing novel antihypertensive agents, especially those targeting adrenergic receptors and calcium channels. The '027 patent fits into this context, securing proprietary rights over a chemical class with promising therapeutic potential.

Subsequent Patent Activity

Following the '027 patent, numerous patents have been filed, citing it as prior art for derivatives and formulations within the same chemical landscape. These include:

  • Secondary patents that expand the chemical scope or claim improved pharmacokinetics and formulations.
  • Use patents past the original primary patent's expiration, describing new therapeutic indications.

Key later patents often attempt to carve out narrower rights around specific derivatives or formulations, reflecting strategic maneuvering to extend market exclusivity.

Legal and Patent Challenges

The broad claims originally granted have faced challenges in various jurisdictions, focusing on whether some claims encompass obvious derivative modifications. However, in the U.S., the patent was maintained, affirming its robustness, at least until its expiration in 1999.

Current Patent Landscape

Today, the landscape has shifted toward biosimilars, patents on combination therapies, and second-generation compounds built upon the foundational chemistry disclosed in the '027 patent. Patent expirations have opened pathways for generic development of drugs based on the disclosed compounds, yet related patents may still provide protections around specific formulations or methods.


Key Patent Milestones and Their Impacts

Year Milestone Impact
1981 Patent Grant Secured exclusive rights to a broad class of compounds.
1990s Patent Challenges & Follow-On Patents Extended commercial protection via derivatives and formulations.
1999 Patent Expiry Opened pharmaceutical market for generics based on this chemistry.
2000s–Present Diversification of Therapeutic Applications Development of first-in-class or best-in-class drugs inspired by the original structure.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: The '027 patent's broad claims underscore the importance of early, comprehensive claims during patent prosecution to build strong protection.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Patent expiration enables market entry but requires careful freedom-to-operate analyses considering remaining patents on specific derivatives or formulations.
  • Patent Authors & Lawyers: Emphasize the strategic importance of claiming both core compounds and their therapeutic applications to maximize scope.
  • Researchers: The patent reveals a rich chemical space with potential for further modifications and novel therapeutic uses.

Conclusion

United States Patent 4,258,027 laid a foundational framework within antihypertensive drug development through comprehensive claims on specific chemical derivatives and their pharmaceutical applications. Its scope encompasses a broad class of compounds, protected via detailed claims that covered synthesis, use, and formulations.

The patent landscape following this patent shows a strategic expansion of rights, with derivatives, formulations, and new uses built around the core chemical class. The expiration of the patent has allowed for increased generic competition and innovation, while ongoing research continues to leverage the chemical principles laid out in the original patent.

Understanding the nuances of the scope and claims of '027 provides valuable insights into effective patent drafting, lifecycle management, and the dynamics of pharmaceutical patent strategy.


Key Takeaways

  • The '027 patent's extensive claims provided robust protection over a broad chemical class, influencing subsequent derivative and formulation patents.
  • Effective claim language, including structural and functional limitations, is vital for both patent strength and navigating the patent landscape.
  • Patent expiration facilitates generic entry but requires careful navigation of remaining related patents and exclusivities.
  • Strategic patent filings post-expiration involve securing new uses, formulations, or derivatives to sustain market protection.
  • The pharmaceutical patent landscape is dynamic; continuous innovation and strategic intellectual property management are critical for sustained competitive advantage.

FAQs

Q1: What is the main chemical class covered by U.S. Patent 4,258,027?
A1: It covers substituted benzhydryl derivatives with specific structural features suitable for antihypertensive therapy.

Q2: How did subsequent patents expand the scope established by the '027 patent?
A2: Subsequent patents claimed specific derivatives, novel formulations, and new therapeutic uses, narrowing or extending rights based on the original chemistry.

Q3: What strategic considerations are important when analyzing the patent landscape around compound patents like '027?
A3: Key considerations include claim scope, patent expiration, overlapping rights on derivatives or formulations, and potential patent challenges.

Q4: What impact did the expiration of the '027 patent have on the pharmaceutical market?
A4: It facilitated generic drug production, increasing market competition and reducing prices for drugs based on those compounds.

Q5: Can derivatives of the compounds claimed in '027 still be patented today?
A5: Yes, if they involve novel structures, uses, or formulations not previously claimed or disclosed, providing opportunities for new patent filings.


Sources:

  1. USPTO Patent Database, U.S. Patent No. 4,258,027.
  2. Pharmacological and chemical literature references on antihypertensive agents.
  3. Patent landscape analyses from pharmaceutical patent law reviews.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,258,027

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 4,258,027

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 372853 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria A160880 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 533115 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 5647480 ⤷  Get Started Free
Belgium 882426 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 1133393 ⤷  Get Started Free
Switzerland 644515 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.