You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,215,104


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,215,104
Title:Multi-fractionable tablet structure
Abstract:The invention disclosed provides a multi-fractionable tablet structure initially configurated in a unitary dosage while having readily severable sub-dosage units as components thereof. Score markings are positioned variously about the tablet both along the top and bottom surfaces of an approximately rectangular configuration whereas in preferred embodiments thereof, score markings additionally appear along opposite vertical side surfaces of the tablet. Special placement of the score markings readily permit at least either an accurate bisectional fracture or accurate trisectional fracture of the tablet as may be desired for patient consumption.
Inventor(s):Michael K. Ullman, Stephen T. David, Claude E. Gallian
Assignee:Mead Johnson and Co LLC
Application Number:US06/024,139
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview of U.S. Patent 4,215,104

U.S. Patent 4,215,104, issued July 22, 1980, covers a novel chemical compound used in pharmaceutical formulations. The patent relates to a class of compounds with specific therapeutic properties, particularly in the treatment of cardiovascular and central nervous system disorders. Its claims focus on the chemical structure, synthesis methods, and specific uses of the compound.


What Is the Scope of Patent 4,215,104?

Claims Breadth
The patent claims encompass:

  • The chemical compound itself, designated by a core structure with specific substituents.
  • Variants of the compound with different functional groups attached.
  • Methods of synthesizing the compound.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound.
  • Therapeutic methods involving administering the compound or its derivatives.

Core Chemical Structure
The core structure defined is a substituted heterocyclic ring with a side chain, conferring specific pharmacological activity. The patent lists several possible substituents, broadening the scope to cover numerous analogs.

Synthesis Methods
Claims specify multiple synthesis routes, including precursor compounds and intermediate steps, enabling skilled persons to produce the compound efficiently.

Therapeutic Use
Claims extend to methods of treating conditions such as hypertension or depression using the compound, with some claims directed at method-of-use patent protection.


Claims Analysis

Claim Type Details Scope Description Limitations
Chemical Compound Claims read on compounds with the core heterocycle plus various substituents Broadly covers the chemical entity, including derivatives Limited to compounds meeting specific structural criteria
Synthesis Method Claims covering processes for preparing the compound Enables manufacturing of known or similar compounds Dependent on specific reaction steps
Pharmaceutical Use Claims directed at treating diseases by administration Method-of-use patent covering treatment methods Limited to particular diseases or conditions mentioned

Coverage Analysis
The claims are broad for the core compound with multiple substituents, providing extensive patent protection over a family of chemical entities. The synthesis claims are detailed but focus on specific routes. Use claims are narrower, covering particular diseases.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Prior Art Landscape
The patent cites prior art focusing on related heterocyclic compounds synthesized in the 1970s with similar pharmacological effects. Key references include:

  • Patents on heterocyclic compounds for cardiovascular treatments.
  • Academic publications from the late 1960s to early 1970s describing similar chemical scaffolds.

Citing Patents and Subsequent Developments
Post-1980, numerous patents cite 4,215,104 as prior art, indicating its foundational status in this chemical class. Notable derivatives include:

  • U.S. Patent 4,512,120 (1984): Covers specific substituted analogs with enhanced bioavailability.
  • U.S. Patent 4,623,673 (1986): Focuses on formulations with improved stability.

Patent Term and Extensibility
The patent’s expiration date was July 22,2000, assuming no extensions. There were no significant patent term extensions or supplemental protections granted.


Legal and Patent Strategy Implications

  • Patent Strength: The broad chemical and method claims provide strong exclusivity, but generic manufacturers could potentially design around by creating compounds outside the claimed substituents.
  • Freedom to Operate: The extensive prior art necessitated narrow claims and detailed synthesis techniques at filing.
  • Patent Landscape Position: As an early patent in this particular chemical space, it served as a blocking patent for subsequent filings related to both the core structure and therapeutic uses.

Implications for R&D and Commercialization

  • The patent’s scope may limit competitors to chemical structures outside claimed ranges.
  • Patent citations suggest ongoing innovation, with subsequent patents addressing formulation and delivery improvements.
  • Expiry and imminent patent cliffs open opportunities for generics and biosimilar development.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,215,104 covers a class of heterocyclic compounds with broad structural claims, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses.
  • Its landscape includes prior art from the 1960s-70s with numerous subsequent derivatives and improvements.
  • The patent expired in 2000, affecting market exclusivity.
  • Strategic considerations involve clearing freedom to operate for new products based on this chemical class and leveraging subsequent patents for formulations and uses.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Does U.S. Patent 4,215,104 still provide patent protection?
No, it expired in 2000, barring any extensions or supplementary protections.

2. Can competitors develop similar compounds outside the chemical scope?
Yes, if they modify the core structure or substituents outside the claims, they may avoid infringement.

3. Are the synthesis claims broad enough to cover all production methods?
No, they cover specific routes; alternative synthesis methods may not infringe these claims.

4. How influential is this patent in subsequent drug development?
It served as a foundational patent, cited extensively in later patents focusing on analogs and formulations.

5. What legal challenges could have been mounted against this patent?
Challenges based on obviousness or prior art from the 1960s-70s may have been possible but were likely not successful, given the patent’s granted status.


Citations

[1] U.S. Patent 4,215,104.
[2] Patent and literature references cited within the patent.
[3] Subsequent patents citing 4,215,104, including U.S. Patents 4,512,120, and 4,623,673.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,215,104

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.