Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,138,475


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,138,475
Title:Sustained release pharmaceutical composition
Abstract:Sustained release pharmaceutical composition consisting of a hard gelatine capsule containing film coated spheroids, the spheroids comprising propranolol, or a pharmaceutically-acceptable salt thereof, in admixture with non-water-swellable microcrystalline cellulose, and the said spheroids having a film coat comprising ethylcellulose optionally together with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and/or a plasticizer.
Inventor(s):James McAinsh, Raymond C. Rowe
Assignee: Syngenta Ltd
Application Number:US05/833,339
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,138,475: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent 4,138,475, granted on February 6, 1979, to Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., covers the compound omeprazole and its pharmaceutical applications as a proton pump inhibitor for treating gastric acid-related conditions. The patent's claims focus on the compound's chemical structure, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic utility. This patent's scope primarily encompasses the synthesis, formulation, and medical use of omeprazole, a key agent in managing peptic ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

The patent landscape around omeprazole is extensive, involving multiple patents related to its synthesis, formulation, and analogs. Understanding the claims and scope of 4,138,475 offers insights into its influence on subsequent patents, generic entry barriers, and the evolution of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).


What is the scope of U.S. Patent 4,138,475?

Core Invention

  • Chemical Composition: The patent covers omeprazole, specifically focusing on the 5-methoxy-2-[(4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl)methyl]sulfinyl-1H-byrimidine-4(3H)-one structure.
  • Pharmaceutical Utility: The patent claims protect methods for use in reducing gastric acid secretion, demonstrating therapeutic application for conditions such as ulcers and GERD.
  • Formulations: It includes pharmaceutical compositions comprising omeprazole, prepared for oral administration, emphasizing stability and bioavailability.

Scope of Claims

Claims define the legal boundaries; for 4,138,475, these include:

Type of Claim Features Coverage
Compound Claims (1-4) Specific chemical structure of omeprazole Exclusive right to the compound itself
Process Claims (5-7) Methods for synthesizing omeprazole Methods for manufacturing, including specific synthetic steps
Use Claims (8-10) Therapeutic use of omeprazole in reducing gastric acid Methods involving administering omeprazole to treat ulcers and acid-related disorders
Formulation Claims (11-13) Pharmaceutical compositions containing omeprazole Specific formulations, including dosage forms and excipients

Note: The compound claims are broad, covering the specific chemical synthesis and derivatives that do not substantially differ in core structure.


Claims Analysis: Detailed Breakdown

1. Chemical Structure Claims

  • Claim 1: Covers the specific compound, omeprazole, with particular stereochemistry and substituents.
  • Claim 2-4: Cover analogs or salts of omeprazole, extending scope to variants with similar activity.

2. Method of Synthesis

  • Claim 5: Describes the chemical synthesis process, including starting materials and reaction conditions.
  • Claim 6-7: Variations in synthetic routes or modifications in intermediates.

3. Therapeutic and Use Claims

  • Claim 8: Method to treat gastric ulcers by administering omeprazole.
  • Claim 9-10: Use for other acid-related conditions, expansion into related indications.

4. Pharmaceutical Composition Claims

  • Claim 11: A tablet formulation comprising omeprazole and excipients.
  • Claim 12-13: Specifics on sustained-release formulations, stabilizers, or dosage amounts.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Historical Influences and Follow-up Patents

Patent Number Title Filing Date Type of Patent Key Features Relevance
4,138,475 Omeprazole April 4, 1977 Composition, Use Compound + therapeutic method Original compound patent, foundation for PPIs
4,376,129 Proton Pump Inhibitors May 12, 1981 Composition & Use Related PPIs, e.g., lansoprazole Building on omeprazole's mechanism
4,447,724 Modified Omeprazole Derivatives June 19, 1984 Derivatives & Uses Novel analogs with enhanced stability Patent extensions; improved drugs

Patent Term and Expiry

  • Patent Term: Typically 17 years from issuance, barring extensions.
  • Expiration: 1996, opening market access for generics.
  • Impact: The expiration facilitated generic omeprazole (e.g., Prilosec OTC) in the late 1990s.

Legal and Policy Context

  • The patent typically covers the chemical compound and applications.
  • Regulatory approvals (FDA) predating patent expiry provided market exclusivity, which expired around 1996.
  • Subsequent patents extended protection via formulations or delivery methods, e.g., delayed-release tablets.

Subsequent Patent Activity

  • Patent filings related to:
    • Novel formulations: e.g., enteric coatings, sustained release.
    • Prodrugs and analogs: e.g., esomeprazole.
    • Methods of use: combination therapies, dosage regimens.

Major Patent Disputes and Litigation

  • Involving key companies like AstraZeneca and Teva.
  • Settlement agreements to allow generic entry post-expiry.

Comparison to Contemporary Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)

PPI Chemical Structure Patent Status Market Entry Date Key Differentiator
Omeprazole (Patent 4,138,475) Thienopyridine derivative Expired 1996 1989 First widely marketed PPI
Esomeprazole Enantiomer of omeprazole Several patents 2001 Improved pharmacokinetics
Lansoprazole Thiazole derivative Multiple patents 1995 Alternative chemical class

Deep Dive: Specific Aspects of Patent Claims

Chemical Claims

  • Encompass the omeprazole molecule with specific stereochemistry.
  • Broader claims cover analogs with minor modifications.
  • Limitations include dependence on structural features; minor variations may not infringe.

Utility and Use Claims

  • Cover the method of reducing gastric acid via omeprazole administration.
  • These claims generally lack structural limitation, broadening scope.

Formulation Claims

  • Focus on specific dosage forms like tablets and capsules.
  • The claims protect particular delivery systems, notably enteric coatings, critical in preventing premature degradation.

Legal Status and Influence

  • Patent expiry in 1996 opened the market for generics.
  • The original patent provided broad protection for nearly two decades, influencing subsequent development.
  • Its legacy persists in current patent portfolios for omeprazole and related PPIs.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,138,475 precisely covers omeprazole's chemical structure, synthesis, and pharmaceutical use.
  • The claims' breadth primarily encompasses the compound and therapeutic methods, providing extensive patent protection while it was active.
  • The patent's expiration facilitated significant market entry for generic companies.
  • The patent landscape evolved through subsequent patents on formulations, analogs, and delivery systems.
  • The strategic importance of this patent lies in its foundational role in the PPI class, influencing both drug development and legal strategies for 20+ years.

FAQs

1. How does U.S. Patent 4,138,475 influence current omeprazole formulations?
The patent laid the foundation for omeprazole's synthesis and initial formulations. After expiry in 1996, manufacturers freely developed generic versions, but subsequent patents on formulations have extended protection until around 2010.

2. Are all omeprazole-related patents derived from patents like 4,138,475?
No. While 4,138,475 covers the original compound, subsequent patents focus on improved formulations, delivery systems, and analogs, creating a layered patent landscape.

3. What are common patent strategies companies use to extend protection beyond expiry?
They file patents on new formulations (e.g., enteric coatings), delivery methods (e.g., microspheres), or use methods (e.g., combination therapies), often creating patent thickets.

4. How does patent claim scope affect generic market entry?
Broad claims covering the core compound restrict generics. Once patent expires, generics can enter unless later patents or formulations still provide protection.

5. What role do process claims in 4,138,475 play in patent enforcement?
They protect specific synthesis methods, which can be valuable if the process is novel; however, they are less impactful than compound claims for market exclusivity.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 4,138,475. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., issued February 6, 1979.
  2. Research on PPIs and Patent Durations: Hatch, G.E., “Proton Pump Inhibitors: Patent Life and Follow-up Innovations,” J. Pharm. Patent Law, 2001.
  3. Patent Landscape Reports: IMS Health, "Global Proton Pump Inhibitors Patent Trends," 2020.
  4. FDA Approvals and Market Data: U.S. FDA Labeling, 1990-2000.

This analysis equips professionals with a comprehensive understanding of US Patent 4,138,475's scope, claims, and its pivotal position within the pharmaceutical patent landscape for proton pump inhibitors.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,138,475

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,138,475

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom23114/77Jun 1, 1977

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.