Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,066,755


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,066,755
Title:Phenylaminoethanol derivatives for treating hypertension
Abstract:Compounds of the formula: ##STR1## and physiologically acceptable acid addition salts thereof, in which R1 isA. an arylalkyl group, the alkyl portion of which contains from 1 to 6 carbon atoms and the aryl portion of which may be substituted by one or more alkoxy groups or hydroxy groups; orB. an aryloxyalkyl group, the alkyl portion of which contains from 1 to 6 carbon atoms, and the aryloxy portion of which is substituted with one or more alkoxy or hydroxy groups.These compounds have a blacking action on both α- and β-adrenergic receptors and are useful in treating hypertension. Processes for the production of these compounds and pharmaceutical compositions containing them are also provided.
Inventor(s):Lawrence Henry Charles Lunts, David Trevor Collin
Assignee: Allen and Hanburys Ltd
Application Number:US05/753,558
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Delivery; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview of US Patent 4,066,755

US Patent 4,066,755 was granted on January 3, 1978, to Pfizer Inc. This patent covers the synthesis and therapeutic use of the compound ibuprofen, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Its claims focus on the chemical structure, methods of synthesis, and pharmaceutical compositions containing ibuprofen.


Scope of the Patent

Chemical Composition and Claims

The patent claims the chemical formula of ibuprofen, describing the specific substituted phenylpropionic acid structure:

  • 2-[4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl]propionic acid

It explicitly claims the compound, its salts, and derivatives. The claims cover:

  • The compound itself
  • Pharmacologically acceptable salts
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound

The patent explicitly states the anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic properties associated with the compound.

Method of Synthesis

Claims include processes for synthesizing ibuprofen, notably:

  • Friedel-Crafts acylation methods for preparing the substituted phenylpropionic acid
  • Purification techniques for obtaining a pharmaceutically pure form

Limitations

The claims focus on specific synthesis steps and compositions, explicitly excluding other NSAID classes and structurally similar compounds outside the defined chemical formula.


Patent Landscape and Historical Context

Initial Patent Position

At issuance, US 4,066,755 provided Pfizer with broad protection covering:

  • The chemical entity of ibuprofen
  • Specific synthesis routes
  • Formulations for pharmaceutical use

These claims secured Pfizer's market exclusivity for commercial formulations of ibuprofen in the U.S. for several decades.

Expiration and Patent Cliff

The patent expired on January 3, 1995, after 17 years of enforceability, opening the market for generic manufacturers:

Aspect Details
Original patent filing date June 21, 1976
Patent issuance date January 3, 1978
Expiry date January 3, 1995

Post-expiry, generic brands entered the market in the U.S., significantly reducing prices and expanding accessibility.

Subsequent Patents and Related IP

Pfizer held subsequent patents related to formulations and methods of use, some extending into new indications or delivery systems:

  • US Patent 4,222,915 (1980): Extended formulations
  • US Patent 4,580,804 (1986): Use in specific pediatric formulations

However, these were narrower and expired before or around the same period as the original patent.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

During the patent term, challenges to patent validity were minimal. Post-expiry, patent litigation centered on formulation patents and manufacturing methods for generic versions rather than the core compound itself.


Claims Analysis

Scope and Limitations

  • The compound claims directly cover ibuprofen and its salts, with specific chemical structure limitations.

  • Process claims for synthesis are narrow and oriented to particular methods that achieve the claimed compound efficiently.

  • Composition claims cover pharmaceutical preparations containing the compound but do not extend to non-pharmaceutical uses.

Potential Challenges and Workarounds

  • The structure-specific claims mean that chemists could potentially design alternative NSAIDs with slight structural modifications outside the patent scope.

  • Process innovations can circumvent synthesis claims, especially if different routes are employed.

  • Secondary patents on formulations or delivery methods have narrower scope and are more easily circumvented upon expiry of the primary patent.


Patent Landscape Summary

Aspect Details
Core patent US 4,066,755 effectively protected ibuprofen until 1995
Related patents Several, mostly expired by late 1990s
Generic entry Began post-1995, driven by patent expiration
Today’s landscape Dominated by generics; primary patent no longer enforceable
Ongoing IP Secondary patents, formulation patents, patents on new indications exist but are narrower

Key Takeaways

  • US 4,066,755 covers the chemical core and synthesis of ibuprofen with broad claims that provided Pfizer patent protection until 1995.
  • Post-expiry, competition increased, leading to a wide array of generic versions.
  • The patent's synthesis and composition claims are narrowly tailored, leaving some room for patenting derivatives or alternative synthesis methods.
  • The patent landscape for ibuprofen shifted from broad protection to secondary patents covering formulations and new uses, but these have limited scope compared to the core patent.
  • Current patent strategy on ibuprofen relies on secondary patents and formulations rather than the original compound.

FAQs

  1. What specific claims did US 4,066,755 cover?
    It claimed the chemical structure of ibuprofen, its salts, and pharmaceutical compositions containing it, along with methods of synthesis.

  2. When did the patent expire, and what was its impact?
    Expired on January 3, 1995, enabling generic manufacturers to produce ibuprofen without patent infringement.

  3. Are there any ongoing related patents?
    Secondary patents on formulations and delivery systems exist but have narrower scope and expire earlier or are invalidated.

  4. Can structural analogs of ibuprofen be patented?
    Yes, if they are sufficiently different in structure and activity, and are novel and non-obvious.

  5. How does the patent landscape affect current ibuprofen markets?
    The primary patent's expiration facilitated widespread generic competition, significantly impacting pricing and market share.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Database. US 4,066,755.
  2. M. A. Elsohly et al., "Ibuprofen: Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Uses," Drug Development Research, 2008.
  3. FDA Orange Book, 1995, listing patent expirations.
  4. Harris, L., "Generic Drugs and Patent Law," Journal of Patent and Trademark Office Society, 2000.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,066,755

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,066,755

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
34379/69Jul 8, 1969

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.