You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 4,057,323


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,057,323
Title:Projection screen
Abstract:Large projection screens, of which planetarium domes are typical, may conveniently be made up of a plural of prefinished panels, at least one edge of at least some of which panels overlaps another panel in a lap joint construction so that edges of the panels have a minimal effect upon light directed upon the screen from any angle. Panel edges overlapping another panel are tapered from a generally uniform thickness to substantially reduced thickness at the edge in a relatively short distance compared to panel dimensions and made to conform to and lay against the other panel. The panels are preferably made by a method which may involve either first shaping or finishing the projection surface of the dome panel. Each edge which will overlap another panel is then chamfered on the surface opposite the finished surface to form the taper. Finally the chamfered edge is deformed so that it will lay against and conform to the panel which it overlaps.
Inventor(s):Robertson Ward, Jr.
Assignee:Individual
Application Number:US05/727,255
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
 
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 4,057,323

Introduction

United States Patent 4,057,323, granted on November 1, 1977, to Monsanto Company, pertains to a crucial pharmaceutical invention in the realm of herbicide compounds, specifically relating to the synthesis and use of phenoxy herbicides. It broadly covers certain 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid derivatives and their incorporation into herbicidal compositions. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of the patent, its influence on the patent landscape, and contextualizes its relevance within the evolving field of agrochemical patents.


Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope primarily encompasses novel chemical compounds and their utilization as herbicides. Specifically, it covers a subset of phenoxy derivatives designed for plant growth regulation and weed control. The patent claims extend to the chemical structures themselves, their synthesis methods, and the compositions containing these compounds.

Key aspects of the patent scope include:

  • Chemical Composition: The patent encompasses certain phenoxyacetic acid derivatives characterized by unique substitutions on the aromatic ring or the acetic acid backbone, which confer herbicidal activity. These compounds are structural modifications of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), a well-known herbicide.

  • Method of Preparation: It delineates instances of chemical synthetic routes leading to these derivatives, emphasizing practical synthetic procedures.

  • Herbicidal Utility: The patent claims compounds effective as selective or non-selective herbicides, capable of controlling broadleaf weeds and grasses.

  • Herbicidal Compositions: Formulations combining these derivatives with carriers or adjuvants for application are included within the scope, broadening the patent’s protective reach.

This comprehensive scope, which spans chemical structures, synthetic methods, and applications, provides broad coverage, complicating subsequent patent challenges and generating a strong barrier to generic or near-chemical equivalents.


Claims Analysis

The patent includes multiple claims, typically categorized as independent and dependent. The main claims focus on the chemical compounds and their uses.

Independent Claims:

  • Claim 1: Defines a class of phenoxy compounds with a core structure of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid bearing specific substitutions on the aromatic ring or acetic backbone, provided they meet particular structural criteria. This claim establishes the broadest scope, encompassing a family of derivatives.

  • Claim 10: Extends to herbicidal compositions comprising these compounds combined with carriers or adjuvants, asserting the utility of these derivatives as herbicides.

Dependent Claims:

  • Detail specific substitutions or variations of the core structure, such as particular halogen replacements, alkyl or alkoxy groups, which narrow the scope but add specificity, thus enabling protection over a spectrum of structurally similar compounds.

  • Include particular synthesis routes and formulation techniques, adding defensibility to the patent’s scope regarding manufacturing methods.

Implications of Claims

The breadth of Claim 1 secures protection over a broad class of phenoxy herbicides, effectively preventing others from making or selling compounds falling within that structural scope. Dependent claims allow the patentees to defend narrower, specific derivatives, ensuring comprehensive coverage of their chemical innovation.


Patent Landscape and Historical Context

Preceding and Related Patents:

Prior to the '323 patent, Monsanto and other agrochemical companies filed for patents on various phenoxy herbicides, including 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T compounds. Patent 4,057,323 built upon these foundational compounds by claiming novel derivatives with improved efficacy, selectivity, or reduced environmental impact.

Impact and Subsequent Developments:

  • The patent’s expiration in 1994 (considering the 17-year patent term from issuance) opened the landscape for generic manufacturing. However, during its term, it played a substantial role in protecting a broad array of phenoxy derivatives.

  • This patent stood as a basis for generating follow-up patents, including process improvements, formulations, and specific derivatives, contributing to a complex patent thicket around phenoxy herbicides.

Patent Litigation and Challenges:

While there is limited public record of litigations directly challenging this patent, derivative patents and patent applications filed later attempted to carve out narrower niches or improve upon the derivatives disclosed.

Broader Patent Landscape:

  • The herbicide segment has been heavily patent-protected, with numerous patents covering chemical modifications to phenoxyacetic acids.

  • The evolution of patent law and regulations, including restrictions on certain herbicides (e.g., due to environmental concerns about dioxins associated with 2,4,5-T), affected the scope, with newer patents focusing on derivatives with ostensibly safer profiles.


Relevance of the Patent in Current Context

In today’s landscape, patents like 4,057,323 underpin the foundational IP around phenoxy herbicides. Their expiration catalyzed generic development, but the extensive prior art landscape complicates the issuance of new, broad patents on similar compounds.

Innovators seeking to develop new herbicide derivatives now face the challenge of designing around these compounds, often focusing on unique substitutions, novel formulations, or environmentally friendly modifications. The patent landscape remains priority heavy, requiring meticulous patent landscaping to avoid infringement while innovating within the existing scope.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical and Application Scope: Patent 4,057,323 protects a wide class of phenoxy derivatives, including methods of synthesis and formulations, safeguarding Monsanto’s chemical innovation for nearly two decades.

  • Strategic Vertical Integration: The patent’s claims establish a robust IP barrier, limiting competitors’ ability to develop similar herbicides without risk of infringement, thus consolidating market position.

  • Evolving Patent Landscape: Post-expiration, the landscape shifted toward generics, but subsequent patents have focused on narrow derivatives, formulations, and environmentally safer compounds.

  • Innovation Challenges: Developing new herbicidal compounds requires navigating existing patent claims, especially those covering core chemical structures or synthesis methods.

  • Regulatory and Environmental Considerations: Environmental restrictions on certain phenoxy herbicides influence the scope of patenting efforts, prompting innovation toward safer derivatives.


FAQs

1. What is the primary chemical innovation claimed in Patent 4,057,323?
It claims a class of phenoxyacetic acid derivatives with specific substitutions on the aromatic ring, designed as herbicides with improved efficacy and selectivity over prior compounds like 2,4-D.

2. How did Patent 4,057,323 influence subsequent herbicide patents?
It established a broad patent coverage over phenoxy derivatives, serving as a foundational patent that subsequent innovations built upon through narrower derivative claims, formulation improvements, and synthesis methods.

3. Are the compounds claimed in this patent still under patent protection today?
No, the patent expired in 1994, allowing for generic production and research use, but the extensive patent landscape around phenoxy herbicides continues to influence current research and patenting strategies.

4. How does the scope of this patent affect herbicide development?
Its broad claims make it challenging for competitors to develop similar compounds without infringing, encouraging innovation within the narrow scopes of derivatives or alternative herbicidal mechanisms.

5. What are the environmental implications related to the compounds in this patent?
While effective as herbicides, derivatives of phenoxy compounds like those in the patent have faced scrutiny due to environmental concerns, leading to regulation and the pursuit of safer alternatives in subsequent patents.


Sources
[1] US Patent 4,057,323, "Herbicides and Methods for Weed Control," issued November 1, 1977.
[2] Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) resources on phenoxy herbicides.
[3] Patent landscaping reports on phenoxy herbicide patents.
[4] Industry publications on herbicide patent trends and developments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,057,323

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.