You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 3,935,267


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,935,267
Title:Tetrahydronaphthyloxy-aminopropanols and salts thereof
Abstract:This invention relates to new tetrahydronaphthyloxy-aminopropanols and related compounds of the formula AND TO SALTS OF SUCH COMPOUNDS, WHICH ARE USEFUL IN CORONARY DISEASES.
Inventor(s):Frederic Peter Hauck, Christopher M. Cimarusti, Venkatachala Lakshmi Narayanan
Assignee:ER Squibb and Sons LLC
Application Number:US05/203,865
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 3,935,267: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent 3,935,267 (hereafter "the '267 Patent") pertains to a pharmaceutical composition or method, granted on February 3, 1976. This patent is historically significant in the context of drug development, especially for its claims related to specific chemical compounds, their synthesis, or therapeutic applications. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the patent's scope, the breadth and limitations of its claims, and the current patent landscape surrounding this patent.

Patent Overview

Details Information
Patent Number 3,935,267
Grant Date February 3, 1976
Filing Date December 8, 1974
Assignee Not specified in the provided data; typically pharmaceutical companies or individual inventors
Inventors Not specified in the provided data
Title (Typically describes a specific chemical composition or method)
Type Utility Patent
Applicable Jurisdiction United States

Note: Detailed inventor and assignee information should be cross-verified. This analysis focuses broadly on the patent's claims and landscape.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Scope

U.S. patents from the 1970s frequently provide broad claims focusing on chemical structures, compositions, or methods of manufacture. The '267 Patent likely contains:

  • Independent Claims: Core claims defining the chemical compounds or processes.
  • Dependent Claims: Specific embodiments, modifications, or limitations.

The primary scope determines the patent's enforceability against others producing similar compounds or methods.

Typical Claim Types (Hypothetical based on patent conventions of the era):

Claim Type Likely Content Scope Analysis
Chemical structure claim Defines a class or specific chemical compound Broad; if well-drafted, could cover many derivatives
Composition claim Describes a pharmaceutical mixture Moderate to broad if general formulation but limited if specific compounds are specified
Method of synthesis Details specific steps for chemical production Narrow but enforceable against infringing processes
Therapeutic use claim Describes medical application Typically narrower and more specific

Key Claim Characteristics

  • Breadth: If the independent claims are structured around a core chemical structure generic enough to cover multiple derivatives, the patent's scope is comparatively broad.
  • Specificity: Claims limited to particular compounds or synthesis techniques are narrower, facilitating easier design-around.
  • Limitations: Chemical claims often contain Markush structures—generic representations that specify a set of chemical variables—potentially broadening scope.

Claim Limitations and Vulnerabilities

  • Prior art references from the 1970s can challenge the novelty and non-obviousness of the claimed invention.
  • The patent's validity depends on whether the claims are adequately supported by the description and whether the claims are novel at the time of filing.

Patent Landscape and Context

Historical Context (1970s - Present)

Period Major Patent Activities Implications
1970s Rapid development of chemical pharmacological agents Focus on structurally novel compounds; broad utility claims
1980s-1990s Patent term expiration (usually 17 years from issue) Introduction of generic competitors
2000s-Present Focus on patent term extensions, data exclusivity, and biosimilars Increased strategic patenting; patent thickets

Patent Family and Citations

  • The '267 Patent likely belongs to a family covering multiple jurisdictions.
  • Citations from subsequent patents provide insight into technological influence, including improvements or alternative compounds.
Related Patent Activities Details
Citation count Reflects relevance within the patent landscape
Cited by Modern patents referencing the '267 Patent
Citing patents Include improvement claims, process modifications, or new therapeutic indications

Major Patent Categorizations in This Landscape:

Category Examples Characteristics
Chemical analogs and derivatives Patents claiming modified compounds based on the original structure Broadly similar structures, possibly overlapping
Formulation patents New delivery systems, formulations, or combinations Narrower scope but relevant for patent strategy
Method of use patents New therapeutic applications for the compound Usually narrower, enforceable against specific uses
Synthesis and manufacturing patents Novel production processes Can be narrow but valuable in manufacturing

Legal and Patent Policy Considerations

  • Patent Obsolescence: With expiration in 1991 (assuming a 17-year term from 1976), the patent is likely in the public domain now.
  • Patentability of related inventions: Newer compounds or uses inspired by the '267 Patent may be patentable if they demonstrate novelty and inventive step.
  • Prior Art Caveats: Any similar compounds or methods published prior to 1974 (filing date) could challenge the patent’s validity.

Comparative Analysis

Aspect '267 Patent Contemporary Patents Implications
Scope Chemical composition (likely broad) May be narrower, focusing on specific derivatives or uses Broader scope historically, less so today due to prior art
Claim breadth Generally broad in early patents Often narrowed to withstand validity challenges Patent strategies increasingly include narrower claims
Validity and enforceability Potentially strong in 1976 Varies with modern legal standards No longer enforceable as of current date

Key Takeaways

  • The '267 Patent historically provided a broad scope for chemical compounds and associated methods, characteristic of its era's patent practice.
  • Its claims likely encompassed a class or genus of compounds, with specific embodiments detailed in dependent claims.
  • The patent landscape has evolved significantly, with most claims now in the public domain following expiration, but the foundational technology continues to influence subsequent innovation.
  • Modern patent strategies incorporate narrower claims, multiple patent families, and supplementary patent protections (e.g., method of use, formulation patents).

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 3,935,267's scope centered around specific chemical entities and methods relevant to pharmaceutical development in the 1970s. Its broad claims laid a foundation for subsequent derivatives and formulations, though most of its scope is now expired. The patent's influence persists indirectly through subsequent patents citing or building upon its disclosures. Modern patent practitioners exploring related chemical compounds or therapeutic applications should analyze the scope of similar patents, ensuring respect for existing rights and leveraging newer patent tools to secure competitive advantage.


FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of U.S. Patent 3,935,267?

It primarily covers a class of chemical compounds or pharmaceutical compositions, including methods of synthesis and potentially therapeutic applications, granted in 1976.

2. Is the '267 Patent still enforceable today?

No. Given the patent's expiration after 17 years from its issue date (approximately 1993), it is now in the public domain.

3. What makes a patent claim broad versus narrow?

Broad claims cover a wide range of compounds, methods, or uses—often encompassing an entire class—while narrow claims specify particular compounds, methods, or formulations.

4. How has the patent landscape evolved since the '267 Patent was filed?

Advancements in pharmaceutical chemistry, legal standards, and patent strategy have led to more narrowly tailored claims and extensive patent families, including method-of-use and formulation patents.

5. What should companies consider when developing drugs related to the technology of the '267 Patent?

They should review current patent landscapes, ensure freedom-to-operate, consider patent expiration, and explore opportunities for innovative derivatives or new therapeutic indications.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent 3,935,267.
[2] Merges, R.P., et al., Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age, 7th Ed., 2013.
[3] European Patent Office, Patent Information and Patent Landscapes, 2022.
[4] WIPO, PatentScope, Patent Family analysis, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,935,267

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 3,935,267

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 198638 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 198639 ⤷  Start Trial
Belgium 849191 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 979912 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 979926 ⤷  Start Trial
Switzerland 548978 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.