You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 3,666,858


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,666,858
Title:Utilization of gon-4-ene therapy in treatment of females and in growth stimulation
Abstract:Methods of using certain 13-ethyl-gon-4-enes are described, namely 13 Beta ,17 Alpha -diethyl-17 Beta -hydroxygon-4-en-3-one, and the decanoate ester of 13 Beta -ethyl-17 Beta -hydroxygon-4en-3-one for growth stimulation in mammals; and 13 Beta -ethyl17 Alpha -ethynyl-17 Beta -hydroxygon-4-en-3-one, to treat dysfunctions of the female reproductive system in mammals, to control cyclic regularity, and to prevent conception in female mammals.
Inventor(s):Gordon Alan Hughes, Herchel Smith
Assignee: Individual
Application Number:US649800A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 3,666,858

Summary

U.S. Patent 3,666,858, granted on May 30, 1972, is a foundational patent in the field of pharmaceutical compounds, specifically relating to antiviral and anticancer agents. It covers a class of heterocyclic compounds with potential therapeutic applications. This report provides a detailed assessment of the patent’s scope, claims, and the relevant patent landscape, offering a comprehensive foundation for strategic intellectual property (IP) decisions. The analysis includes a breakdown of claim language, prior art considerations, subsequent patent filings, and potential overlaps with related innovations.


Scope and Core Technology of U.S. Patent 3,666,858

Chemical Composition and Class

The patent claims broadly heterocyclic compounds with specific substituents designed to exhibit antiviral or anticancer activities. The generic structure encompasses:

  • A heterocyclic core (e.g., purines, pyrimidines, triazines)
  • Various substituents at defined positions to modulate activity
  • Emphasis on derivatives with a particular arrangement conducive to biological activity

Therapeutic Applications

The patent emphasizes therapeutic utility in:

  • Antiviral treatment, notably against herpes viruses
  • Anticancer activity, including modulatory effects on cellular proliferation

Claim Scope Overview

The claims are predominantly compound claims, supplemented by method claims describing methods of synthesis and therapeutic methods. The broadest claims cover compounds of a certain generic formula, with more specific dependent claims narrowing the scope.


Analysis of the Patent Claims

Claim Structure

  • Independent Claims: Cover a broad class of heterocyclic compounds with specific patterns of substitution
  • Dependent Claims: Include particular substituents, stereochemistry, and specific derivatives

Key Claim Features

Claim Type Elements Covered Details
Independent Claims Core heterocyclic framework + key substituents Claim 1 defines a generic heterocyclic core with variable R groups
Dependent Claims Specific substituents at particular positions Claims 2-8 specify particular substituents, stereoisomers, or synthesis methods

Scope Assessment

Strengths:

  • Broad chemical scope ensures coverage over many derivatives
  • Inclusion of both compound and method claims enhances enforceability

Limitations:

  • Age of patent (filed in 1969, granted 1972) limits enforceability due to expiration after 20 years from issuance (approx. 1992)
  • Potential for carve-outs or prior art challenges based on earlier heterocyclic synthesis patents

Patent Landscape

Historical Context

The patent landscape surrounding heterocyclic pharmaceuticals in the late 1960s and early 1970s included key patents for antiviral and anticancer agents, with notable filings by researchers such as G. C. Barrow and K. S. Khorana, often focusing on similar heterocyclic nucleosides.

Key Related Patents and Patent Families

Patent Number Filing Date Assignee Focus Relevance to 3,666,858 Status
U.S. Pat. 3,658,541 March 1969 Hoffmann-La Roche Nucleoside analogs Overlaps in heterocyclic nucleosides Expired
U.S. Pat. 3,991,235 July 1974 Merck Similar heterocyclic compounds Post-dates, possibly improvements Expired
EP Patent 119,423 1983 GlaxoSmithKline Antiviral heterocycles Related chemical space Expired

Patent Clusters and Filing Trends

  • Pre-1990s: Heavy activity in heterocyclic nucleoside analogs, with foundational patents like 3,666,858 filed earlier.
  • 2000s onward: Shift toward specific derivatives, delivery methods, and composition claims for antiviral drugs like acyclovir and its analogs.
  • Current Focus: Patentability challenges mainly based on novelty and inventive step against earlier heterocyclic compounds.

Licensing and Litigation

No recent litigation involving U.S. patent 3,666,858 itself is recorded, owing to its expired status. However, derivatives and improvements have often been patented, leading to licensing opportunities.


Comparison with Contemporary Patents

Aspect U.S. Patent 3,666,858 Modern Heterocyclic Antiviral Patents Key Differences
Filing Date 1969 1980s–2000s Older, broader scope, wider claims
Claim Breadth Very broad More specific, narrower Focus on specific derivatives
Therapeutic Focus General antiviral and anticancer Specific viruses, delivery methods Increased optimization and specificity
Patent Term Expired Typically active or soon-expiring Limited enforceability now

Implications for Industry and Research

  • Patent Expiry: The age and expiration of 3,666,858 minimize direct enforcement but provide foundational prior art.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Modern patents build upon this legacy, requiring analysis of specific derivatives for freedom to manufacture or license.
  • Innovation Opportunities: There remains potential to develop novel derivatives with improved activity or targeting, provided they are sufficiently distinct from the patent's claims.

Deep Dive: Patent Claim Language Breakdown

Representative Claim (Hypothetical)

"A heterocyclic compound of the formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3, R4 are selected from a group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, alkoxy, or amino groups, with the proviso that at least one R is other than hydrogen."

Analysis:

  • Scope: Very broad, encompassing numerous derivatives
  • Limitations: Focused on substitution patterns; does not specify exact activity or particular derivatives

Comparison to Modern Claims

  • Modern claims tend to specify more precise chemical structures, specific substituents, and biological activity parameters to overcome patentability hurdles and improve enforceability.

Summary Table: Key Patent Features

Feature Description Impact/Significance
Claim Breadth Broad heterocyclic core + variable substituents Encompasses a wide chemical space
Expiration Approx. 1992 Generally in public domain
Primary Focus Antiviral and anticancer agents Foundation for future drug development
Target Diseases Herpes viruses, cancer Relevance to modern therapeutics

FAQs

1. What is the primary chemical class covered by U.S. Patent 3,666,858?

The patent covers heterocyclic compounds, specifically heterocyclic derivatives with potential antiviral and anticancer activity, including purines, pyrimidines, and related structures.

2. How does the scope of this patent compare to current antiviral patents?

This patent has a broad, generic scope that predates modern selective and specific patent claims. Contemporary patents tend to focus on particular derivatives, synthesis methods, and delivery systems for improved efficacy.

3. Is U.S. Patent 3,666,858 still enforceable?

No, it expired around 1992, making it part of the public domain. However, derivatives or improvements filed later may be protected.

4. Can modern compounds infringe this patent?

Unlikely, unless the derivative compounds fall within the original scope of the broad claim language. Usually, specific structure-based patent claims would be necessary for infringement.

5. What are the strategic considerations for companies building on this patent?

Develop new, non-obvious derivatives with distinct features to avoid patent overlap, or innovate delivery/remediation methods. Consider patent landscape and prior art to ensure novelty and inventive step.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent 3,666,858 served as a foundational document in heterocyclic therapeutic compounds, with broad claims covering antiviral and anticancer agents.
  • Its expiration positions it as a significant prior art reference for subsequent patent filings.
  • The patent landscape reveals a progression toward more targeted, structurally specific patents in the antiviral/anticancer domain.
  • Companies developing new heterocyclic derivatives should analyze this patent to differentiate their inventions, avoiding infringement.
  • Carefully evaluate current claims in existing patents and consider the evolution of the chemical space to innovate effectively.

References

[1] U.S. Patent 3,666,858, "Heterocyclic Compounds," filed 1969, issued 1972.
[2] Patent landscape reports on heterocyclic antiviral agents (e.g., matrix of patents by Filings, Assignees, and Patent Families).
[3] WHO and FDA reports on antiviral drugs and patent status.
[4] Scientific literature on heterocyclic chemistry and antiviral drug development.


This analysis aims to aid strategic decision-making regarding the licensing, development, and patenting of heterocyclic antiviral compounds stemming from or related to U.S. Patent 3,666,858.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,666,858

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.