Last Updated: June 8, 2026

Details for Patent: 3,644,627


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,644,627
Title:Pharmaceutical compositions and methods for producing coronary dilation with 4 - aryl-1 4 - dihydropyridine derivatives
Abstract:4-PHENYL-, 1,4-DIHYDROPYRIDINES OF THE FORMULA: 2,6-DI(R-),3,5-DI(R''-OOC-),4-(R"-PHENYL)-1,4-DIHYDRO PYRIDINE WHEREIN R IS HYDROGEN OR ALKYL OF 1 TO 3 CARBON ATOMS, R'' IS ALKYL OF 1 TO 4 CARBON ATOMS, AND R" IS HYDROGEN, HALOGEN, OR 1 OR 2 LOWER ALKYL, LOWER ALKOXY, NITRO, LOWER ACYLAMINO, LOWER ALKYLAMINO OR AMINO MOIETIES ARE PRODUCED BY REACTING BENZALDEHYDES OR SUBSTITUTED BENZALDEHYDES WITH ACYL FATTY ACID ESTERS OF THE FORMULA R-CO-CH2-COOR'' WHEREIN R AND R'' ARE AS ABOVE DEFINED WITH AMMONA. THESE 4-PHENYL-1,4-DIHYDROPRIDINES ARE USEFUL IN TREATING DISEASES OF THE CIRCULATION, ESPECIALLY THOSE CONCERNING CORONARIES. THEY ARE PARTICULARLY USEFUL IN THE TREATMENT OF ANGINA PECTORIS.
Inventor(s):Friedrich Bossert, Wulf Vater
Assignee: Bayer AG
Application Number:US872442A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

What does US Patent 3,644,627 claim, and how does it position in the US drug patent landscape?

What is US Drug Patent 3,644,627?

US Patent 3,644,627 is a US drug patent with a defined set of claims covering a specific pharmaceutical invention.

However, the prompt does not include the patent’s claim text. Without the claim language, a complete, accurate scope analysis (claim-by-claim coverage, dependencies, key limitations, and design-around implications) cannot be produced.


What is the claim scope and what are the operative limitations?

The only provided information is: “The claims are:” with no claims following.

Because claim language is the sole basis for scope mapping in a patent landscape analysis (especially for US drug patents where small structural or functional limitations can swing infringement outcomes), this cannot be analyzed to an actionable standard without the actual claim text.


How does US 3,644,627 sit in the US patent landscape?

A useful landscape view depends on at least one of the following:

  • the inventive subject matter (active ingredient, salt/form, formulation, prodrug, method of treatment, dosing regimen) and
  • the independent claim(s) that define the enforceable boundary.

Those elements cannot be derived from the patent number alone in a way that produces a precise and complete landscape assessment consistent with professional patent analysis.


Key Takeaways

  • The requested scope and claims analysis cannot be completed without the actual claim text for US 3,644,627.
  • A credible US drug patent landscape mapping requires the claim-defined invention type (compound vs. composition vs. method) and the exact limitations in the independent claims.
  • With no claim language supplied, the analysis would not meet an actionable standard for R&D or investment decisions.

FAQs

  1. Can you analyze claim scope without the claim text?
    No. Claim scope is determined by the exact words, structure, and dependencies in the patent claims.

  2. Can you infer scope from only the patent number?
    Not to the level required for infringement and landscape decisions, because the operative limitations sit inside the claim language.

  3. What does a “scope and claims” analysis normally include?
    Independent-claim elements, dependent-claim add-ons, claim construction hotspots, and likely design-around vectors.

  4. What drives landscape positioning for US drug patents?
    Whether the claims cover active ingredient, salt/form, formulation, or method-of-use, and how those claims overlap with contemporaneous filings.

  5. What can be done next to enable this analysis?
    Provide the claim text (at least independent claims and key dependent claims).


References

[1] No sources were cited because the claim text and/or patent document content for US 3,644,627 was not provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,644,627

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.