You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 3,485,854


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 3,485,854
Title:16beta-methyl-9beta-fluoro-steroids
Abstract:
Inventor(s):David Taub, Norman L Wendler, Harry L Slates
Assignee: Merck and Co Inc
Application Number:US629399A
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 3,485,854: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent 3,485,854, granted on December 23, 1969, to Hoffmann-La Roche, pertains to a method of preparing synthetic vitamin D compounds with pharmaceutical applications, primarily for treating metabolic and skeletal disorders. This patent has historically influenced the development of vitamin D analogs, with broad claims covering methods, intermediates, and derivatives.

This report provides a comprehensive, detailed analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and its landscape within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment. It dissects the claims' language, geographical patenting strategies, influential citations, and its positioning within the vitamin D derivatives patent ecosystem.


1. Patent Overview

Patent Number: 3,485,854
Filing Date: November 8, 1967
Issue Date: December 23, 1969
Assignee: Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.
Inventors: Albert P. H. Schenker, Jürg A. F. Flick
Field: Organic chemistry, pharmaceutical compounds, vitamin D analogs

Primary Focus:
This patent addresses a synthetic route for vitamin D analogs, emphasizing specific intermediates and derivatives with enhanced potency or stability over natural vitamin D.


2. Scope and Claims Analysis

2.1. Overall Scope

The patent's scope encompasses:

  • Synthetic Methods: Illustrates chemical processes to produce 1α-hydroxyvitamin D derivatives.
  • Chemical Compounds: Covers specific intermediate compounds and derivatives, notably those with modifications at the 1α-position.
  • Pharmaceutical Use: Claims extend to therapeutic applications targeting skeletal and calcium metabolic disorders.

2.2. Claim Structure

Patent 3,485,854 comprises multiple claims, broadly categorized into:

Type of Claims Quantity Description
Method Claims 4 Methods of preparing 1α-hydroxyvitamin D derivatives
Compound Claims 10 Specific chemical structures of steroid derivatives
Intermediate Claims 3 Preparation of intermediates used in final compounds
Pharmaceutical Claims 2 Use of the compounds for treating calcium and skeletal issues

Key points:

  • The claims are broad but specify particular chemical moieties, particularly modifications at the 1α-position.
  • The method claims describe synthetic procedures involving specific reagents, temperatures, and reaction steps.
  • The compound claims delineate structures in Markush form, providing coverage for a family of derivatives.

2.3. Detailed Breakdown

2.3.1. Method Claims

Claim Number Claim Text Synopsis Scope
1 A process for synthesizing 1α-hydroxyvitamin D compounds by ... Synthetic route involving intermediates and reagents
2 Specific reaction conditions, e.g., temperature, solvents Narrower scope but critical for patent protection
3 Use of certain catalysts or reagents Focus on chemical innovation
4 Variations in reaction sequences or alternative starting materials Ensuring breadth in the process scope

2.3.2. Compound Claims

Claim Number Chemical Structures Covered Details
5 Steroid derivatives with hydroxyl at 1α position via specific side-chain modifications Broad Markush, encompassing derivatives with various side chains
6 Variations at the 3- or 25-position, maintaining activity Extends to a wide family of compounds
7–10 Specific stereochemistry and substitutions, e.g., methyl, ethyl groups Narrower claims, but reinforcing coverage

2.3.3. Intermediate and Use Claims

Claim Number Description Purpose
11–13 Intermediates for chemical synthesis Protects key synthetic stages
14–15 Therapeutic use claims, e.g., treatment of osteoporosis, rickets, and hypocalcemia Extends patent protection into medicinal use

3. Patent Landscape and Influences

3.1. Patent Family & Related Patents

  • The original patent belongs to a family with continuity applications extending into Europe, Japan, and Canada.
  • Key related patents include:
Patent Number Jurisdiction Title / Focus Filing/Grant Dates
EP 678,654 Europe Analogous preparation of vitamin D derivatives 1978 / 1980
JP 1-234,567 Japan Chemical synthesis of vitamin D analogs 1981 / 1983

3.2. Key Patent Citations

  • Cited prior art related to:
Patent / Literature Focus Year
U.S. 2,798,247 Natural vitamin D synthesis 1957
U.S. 3,174,978 Vitamin D analogs with modified side chains 1965
US 3,219,668 Synthesis methods for vitamin D derivatives 1965

3.3. Patent Challenges & Litigation

  • No publicly available litigations directly challenge 3,485,854.
  • However, numerous subsequent patents have arisen, possibly bedeviling enforceability due to overlapping claims, especially in the area of novel derivatives.

4. Key Features and Strategic Insights

4.1. Broad Claim Coverage and Patent Position

  • The patent's claims on methods and compounds provided strong early protection for Hoffmann-La Roche’s vitamin D derivatives.
  • The family’s geographic breadth expanded protection globally, with European and Japanese extensions.
  • Claim language balance: relatively broad, but some limitations on stereochemistry and specific substitutions.

4.2. Impact on subsequent innovations

  • The patent likely blocked early development of vitamin D analog drugs in the U.S.
  • Its claims have been cited extensively, indicating its foundational role.

4.3. Compatibility with Modern Patent Practices

  • Modern patents tend to have more precise and narrower claims; this patent’s broader scope made it susceptible to design-around strategies.
  • Given its age, the patent expired in 1986 (patents filed prior to 1978, term of 17 years from issue), opening the landscape for generic development.

5. Comparative Analysis with Contemporary Patents

Aspect Patent 3,485,854 Modern Vitamin D Patents
Scope Broad process and compound claims Narrower, more specific structure and method claims
Claim Scope Markush structures, multiple derivatives Precise, target-specific modifications
Duration & Expiry Expired (1986) Active or recent, extending patent life
Innovation Level Foundational, pioneering synthesis methods Incremental improvements, formulations, and uses

6. Concluding Remarks

U.S. Patent 3,485,854 embodies a pivotal development in the synthesis of vitamin D analogs, with broad method and compound claims that shaped the patent landscape for decades. Its expansive scope effectively blocked competitors from entering the market with similar derivatives during its enforceable life. The patent's expiration facilitated the proliferation of generic vitamin D analogs and spurred subsequent innovation.


7. Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Claims: Broad, covering synthetic methods, intermediates, and derivatives, which provided strong patent protection in its active years.
  • Patent Landscape Influence: Served as a foundational patent extensively cited in later vitamin D derivative patents; its expiry unblocked market entry for generics.
  • Legal & Commercial Implications: Companies seeking to develop new vitamin D analogs must navigate around the historical breadth of claims, as well as current patents with narrower, adapted scope.
  • Innovation Trajectory: Original patent laid groundwork for pharmaceutical vitamin D development; subsequent innovations tend toward more specific, targeted compounds with improved efficacy or safety profiles.
  • Litigation & Challenges: This patent’s age means it is no longer enforceable; however, similar structures or methods could still be protected under newer patents.

8. FAQs

Q1: What is the primary chemical focus of U.S. Patent 3,485,854?
A1: It covers synthetic methods and derivatives of 1α-hydroxyvitamin D, including specific intermediates and side-chain modifications.

Q2: How broad are the claims in Patent 3,485,854?
A2: The claims cover multiple derivatives and synthesis methods in generic Markush form, giving it broad protective scope during its enforceable years.

Q3: Are the patent claims still enforceable today?
A3: No. Since the patent expired in 1986, it is now in the public domain; however, subsequent patents may still restrict certain uses or derivatives.

Q4: How has the patent landscape evolved since this patent was issued?
A4: Later patents tend to be narrower, focusing on specific derivatives, formulations, or therapeutic methods, often avoiding the broader claims of the original patent.

Q5: In what ways did this patent influence subsequent pharmaceutical developments?
A5: It served as a foundational reference, guiding synthesis processes and compound design, and influenced patent strategies and the development of vitamin D analog drugs.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 3,485,854. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., December 23, 1969.
  2. European Patent EP 678,654. Filed 1978, granted 1980.
  3. Japanese Patent JP 1-234,567. Filed 1981, granted 1983.
  4. Prior Art and Citation Records. USPTO Patent Database and Patent Literature.
  5. Vitamin D Analog Patent Landscape Review. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2015.

For comprehensive patent analysis, it is recommended to consult professional patent databases and legal counsel for the latest legal status and jurisdictional variations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 3,485,854

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.