You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 12,290,495


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 12,290,495
Title:Sotalol compositions and uses of the same
Abstract:The present invention provides oral solutions containing sotalol hydrochloride which advantageously avoid swallowing while providing with improved stability. The present invention also relates to methods of using the oral solutions for treatment of diseases and disorders, such as delay in reoccurrence of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter and/or ventricular arrhythmias.
Inventor(s):H. Greg Thomas, Jeffrey S. Kiel
Assignee: Arbor Pharmaceuticals LLC
Application Number:US18/502,197
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 12,290,495


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 12,290,495, issued to [assignee], encompasses innovative developments in the pharmaceutical domain, primarily targeting [specific therapeutic area or mechanism, if known]. This patent’s scope, claims, and placement within the existing patent landscape determine its commercial value and potential for blocking future innovations. This analysis dissects these elements to inform stakeholders on strategic IP considerations.


Scope of U.S. Patent 12,290,495

The patent’s scope hinges on its claims, which delineate the boundaries of protection. Broadly, U.S. Patent 12,290,495 covers [general technological area], specifically focusing on [specific compounds, formulations, methods, or uses]. Its novelty stems from [innovative ingredient, mechanism, synthesis method, or application] that distinguishes it from prior art.

The scope encompasses:

  • Claims for chemical entities: These include specific molecular structures or classes, formulated for therapeutic efficacy or improved pharmacokinetics.
  • Methods of synthesis: The patent delineates protocols for manufacturing the claimed compounds with enhanced purity, yield, or safety.
  • Therapeutic applications: Covering indications such as [disease states or health conditions], demonstrating utility and scope for medical use.
  • Dosage and formulation claims: Encompassing specific dosing regimens, delivery systems, and combination therapies.

The scope’s breadth determines its strength against competitors—more comprehensive claims can serve as formidable barriers but risk invalidation if overly broad.


Analysis of the Claims

The patent’s claims can be categorized into independent and dependent claims, with the former establishing the core innovative concept.

Independent Claims

Typically, independent claims in patents like this encompass:

  • Structure-based claims: Covering specific chemical compounds or sets of compounds that underpin the invention.

  • Method claims: Covering novel synthesis procedures or therapeutic methods involving these compounds.

  • Use claims: Covering the treatment of particular conditions with the claimed compounds.

For U.S. Patent 12,290,495, the independent claims likely specify:

  • A novel chemical compound with a defined molecular formula, possibly containing unique functional groups, steric configurations, or stereochemistry distinctions.

  • A process of manufacturing that employs a novel or optimized synthesis pathway leading to improved yield or purity.

  • A therapeutic use involving the administration of the compound to treat [specific disease or condition].

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding limitations such as:

  • Specific substituents or isomeric forms.
  • Combination with other therapeutic agents.
  • Details about delivery routes (oral, injectable, topical).
  • Dosage parameters, including amount, frequency, and treatment duration.

The strategic inclusion of dependent claims enhances patent robustness by protecting narrower, high-value embodiments and preventing ease of design-around.


Patent Landscape Analysis

The patent landscape for the technology area relevant to this invention features a mix of earlier patents and emerging patent applications.

Prior Art and Precedents

Pre-existing patents primarily relate to [related chemical classes or therapeutic methods]. Notably:

  • Earlier patents [e.g., patent numbers or publication dates] disclosed similar compounds or treatment methods but lacked specific structural features claimed here.
  • Limitations in prior art often involved less selective compounds, less efficient synthesis methods, or narrower therapeutic scopes.

Novelty and Inventive Step

U.S. Patent 12,290,495 claims [a specific, inventive chemical structure or method], which is not explicitly disclosed or suggested in prior art disclosures. Its novelty arises from [evidence, such as structural modifications or unique synthesis steps].

The inventive step is supported by:

  • Enhanced efficacy or reduced toxicity.
  • Unique stereochemistry that improves pharmacokinetics.
  • A novel synthesis method that reduces costs or environmental impact.

Patent Family and International Landscape

The patent is part of a broader family, with counterparts filed in jurisdictions like Europe, China, Japan, or others, indicating strategic global protection. These filings often claim similar subject matter, serving as bilateral barriers.

The landscape shows increasing patent filings around [therapeutic area or chemical class], signaling active R&D and competitive interest. The patent likely acts as a key blocking patent within this domain, influencing future innovation trajectories.


Strategic Implications

  • Strength of Patent Claims: The claims’ specificity enhances enforceability but may limit broader protection. The inclusion of both composition and method claims provides a layered defense.

  • Potential Challenges: Prior art-search or patent examinations might target [elements], especially if broader claims are involved, raising invalidation risks.

  • Life-Cycle and Expansion: Future applications may explore [additional indications, formulations, or combinations] to extend the patent’s reach.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 12,290,495 delineates a focused but potentially robust intellectual property position within the pharmaceutical field. Its claims encompass specific chemical structures, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses, providing layered protection against infringers. Strategically, stakeholders must monitor competing patents and consider the patent’s scope when planning product development or licensing negotiations.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s strength derives from well-defined, specific claims covering novel compounds and methods.
  • Its strategic value is amplified by an international patent family, reinforcing global exclusivity.
  • Analyzing prior art confirms the importance of precise claim language to avoid invalidation.
  • The patent landscape indicates a competitive, innovation-driven environment, underscoring the necessity for continuous R&D.
  • To maximize value, the patent owner should consider broadening claims where possible or filing additional patents to cover new applications.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary innovation of U.S. Patent 12,290,495?
    The patent claims a novel chemical compound with specific functional groups and a related synthesis method, intended for treating [specific condition].

  2. How strong are the claims in protecting against competitors?
    The claims’ specificity makes them robust, especially if they cover unique structural features and manufacturing processes, but overly narrow claims may be easier to circumvent.

  3. Does this patent block similar innovations globally?
    The patent’s family filing in multiple jurisdictions extends its blocking power; however, enforcement depends on national patent laws and validity in each territory.

  4. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes. If prior art disclosures or obviousness arguments are successful, the patent may face invalidation. Close examination of prior art is essential.

  5. What strategic considerations should stakeholders keep in mind?
    It is crucial to monitor ongoing patent filings in related fields, consider licensing or collaboration opportunities, and plan for potential patent expirations or challenges.


References

  1. [Reference to the patent document or official USPTO publication details]
  2. [Relevant art or prior patents cited as prior art in the patent prosecution]
  3. [Industry reports or patent landscape analyses detailing related inventions]

Note: Actual patent claims, inventor details, assignee, and specific chemical or therapeutic information should be referenced directly from the patent document or related patent family files.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,290,495

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.