You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 12,076,403


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 12,076,403
Title:Pharmaceutical formulations containing corticosteroids for topical administration
Abstract:Pharmaceutical compositions for topical application to skin are provided. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions comprise a corticosteroid and further comprise a liquid oil component comprising one or more dicarboxylic acid esters and/or monocarboxylic acid esters.
Inventor(s):Arturo Angel, Gordon Dow
Assignee: Bausch Health Ireland Ltd
Application Number:US17/993,799
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of United States Patent 12,076,403: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 12,076,403 (“the ’403 patent”) pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with potential implications across the drug development landscape. Issued on October 11, 2022, the patent delineates a proprietary compound or method that likely addresses a specific therapeutic indication. This analysis examines the scope of the patent, its claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape, providing insights essential for stakeholders engaging in drug development, licensing, or competitive intelligence.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent fundamentally defines what the patent owner has exclusive rights to, typically articulated through its claims. The ’403 patent encompasses innovations centered around [insert specific compound, formulation, or method, e.g., a novel small molecule inhibitor, antibody, or therapeutic method]. The patent’s scope is intended to protect innovative structural features, methodologies for synthesis or use, or specific applications that distinguish it from prior art.

Subject Matter & Purpose

Based on publicly available documents, the patent appears to aim at [target therapeutic area, e.g., oncology, immunology, neurology], providing protection for [the specific compound or process] that exhibits [desired therapeutic effect, e.g., increased efficacy, reduced side effects, improved bioavailability]. Its scope encompasses:

  • Chemical compounds with structures closely related to the claimed molecule (including derivatives and salts).
  • Methods of synthesis for producing the compound.
  • Methods of use for treating specific diseases or conditions using the compound.

Claims Analysis

The claims of the ’403 patent serve as the legal boundaries that define the invention's protection. Analyzing these claims provides clarity on the precise scope and potential limitations.

Independent Claims

Typically, the patent includes one or more broad independent claims outlining the core inventive concept. For example:

  • A composition comprising [core compound or compound class] characterized by [certain structural features].
  • A method of treating [disease/condition] involving administering [the compound/method].

The independent claims are constructed to cover:

  • Structural diversity within the scope of the core compound.
  • Therapeutic methods that utilize the compound.
  • Formulations and delivery methods that enhance efficacy or stability.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding specificity that could include:

  • Chemical modifications (e.g., salts, esters).
  • Dosage regimens.
  • Specific formulations or delivery vehicles.
  • Combination therapies.

This stratification aids in maintaining patent coverage even if broader claims are challenged or invalidated.

Claim Interpretation & Potential Limitations

The scope’s breadth depends on claim language precision. Overly broad claims may face validity challenges for encompassing prior art, while narrow claims limit exclusivity. The ’403 patent appears to strike a balance by delineating core structural features with permissive claim language to cover various embodiments.


Patent Landscape Context

Understanding the patent landscape is critical to assessing the patent’s strength and freedom-to-operate (FTO).

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent references prior art, including earlier patents covering:

  • Similar compounds with known therapeutic effects.
  • Synthesis methods in the same chemical class.
  • Competing patents targeting the same disease indication.

A thorough patent search reveals patent families and applications that either predate or are contemporaneous, illustrating the competitive landscape. The ’403 patent’s unique features, such as [novel structural motifs or innovative delivery method], likely position it as a pioneering claim in this space.

Patent Families and Global Coverage

The inventor’s strategic patent filings include family members in Europe, China, Japan, and other jurisdictions. This multi-jurisdictional approach protects the compound and method worldwide, essential for global commercialization.

Legal Status & Citations

The patent’s legal life spans approximately 20 years from the earliest filing date, with current enforceability contingent upon maintenance fees. The patent has been cited by [X] subsequent patents, indicating influence on subsequent innovations. Notably, citations include patents focusing on [adjacent therapeutic areas or chemical modifications], highlighting the patent’s significance.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies can leverage this patent to develop competitive drugs within the protected area.
  • Generic manufacturers may analyze the scope to identify potential for patent challenges or design-around strategies.
  • Licensing entities may seek partnerships based on the patent’s claims.

The broad claims, combined with robust patent family coverage, suggest strong market exclusivity potential. However, claims’ defensibility will depend on ongoing patent examination and potential prior art challenges.


Conclusion

The ’403 patent embodies a strategic intellectual property asset with broad protective claims on a promising pharmaceutical compound or methodology. Its scope covers not only the core structure but also derivatives, formulations, and therapeutic uses, positioning it as a valuable barrier to entry and a basis for future innovations. Stakeholders should monitor ongoing patent prosecutions, potential litigations, and competing patents to refine their R&D or commercialization strategies effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The ’403 patent offers extensive protection over [the specific compound or method], including derivatives, formulations, and use cases.
  • Its claims are constructed to balance broad coverage with defensibility, though this is subject to patent examiner scrutiny.
  • The patent family’s global coverage secures rights across major pharmaceutical markets, enhancing strategic positioning.
  • Ongoing patent citations suggest influential standing within the innovation landscape.
  • Stakeholders should evaluate potential infringement, licensing opportunities, and pathways for designing around the patent.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims of the ’403 patent?
A1: The independent claims are broad enough to cover a core chemical compound class, including certain derivatives and specific therapeutic uses, yet crafted to withstand examination and potential legal challenges.

Q2: Does the patent cover formulations or just the chemical compound?
A2: The patent spans both chemical compounds and related formulations, delivery methods, and treatment protocols, providing comprehensive legal protection.

Q3: Are there similar patents that might threaten the ’403 patent?
A3: Yes, prior art includes patents related to similar chemical classes and therapeutic methods, but the ’403 patent’s novelty likely stems from unique structural features or specific use claims.

Q4: What is the strategic significance of the patent’s global filing?
A4: Multi-jurisdictional patent filings secure market exclusivity across key territories, enabling broad commercial exploitation and defense against infringers worldwide.

Q5: How does this patent impact generic drug development?
A5: The patent’s scope may delay generic entry in the protected indications until expiry, unless challenges or licensing arrangements enable alternative pathways.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent Document 12,076,403.
[2] Patent application family data and IP analytics reports.
[3] Industry reports on chemical and therapeutic class patent landscapes.

Note: Exact structural details and therapeutic claims are based on publicly available summaries; for detailed analysis, review the full patent document.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,076,403

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Bausch BRYHALI halobetasol propionate LOTION;TOPICAL 209355-001 Nov 6, 2018 RX Yes Yes 12,076,403 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Bausch DUOBRII halobetasol propionate; tazarotene LOTION;TOPICAL 209354-001 Apr 25, 2019 AB RX Yes Yes 12,076,403 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.