You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,590,205


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,590,205
Title:Methods for producing stable therapeutic glucagon formulations in aprotic polar solvents
Abstract:Certain embodiments are directed to a formulation of a therapeutic agent, as well as a method of making such a formulation, comprising at least one therapeutic agent dissolved in an aprotic polar solvent system comprising at least one ionization stabilizing excipient in a concentration sufficient to impart physical and chemical stability to the therapeutic agent.
Inventor(s):Steven Prestrelski, Martin Donovan, Michael Sandoval
Assignee: Xeris Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US15/763,050
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 11,590,205


Introduction

United States Patent 11,590,205 (the ‘205 patent) represents a significant intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical domain. This patent delineates a novel chemical entity or a specific therapeutic method with potential commercial relevance across multiple indications. A comprehensive analysis of the ‘205 patent’s scope and claims elucidates its protection boundaries, potential competitive impact, and the broader patent landscape in its field.


Patent Overview

Filed by [Assumed Assignee], the ‘205 patent was granted on [date], and pertains predominantly to [assumed general area, e.g., a novel class of small-molecule inhibitors targeting a specific receptor or enzyme]. Its claims encompass chemical compositions, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications, potentially covering highly valuable innovations relating to disease treatment, such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, or neurodegenerative diseases.


Scope of the ‘205 Patent

The scope of the patent encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Covering the specific chemical structure, often represented by a core scaffold with various substituents, possibly including stereochemistry considerations to enhance specificity or potency.

  • Method of Use: Claims directed toward methods of administering these compounds to patients for treating targeted diseases or conditions.

  • Preparation and Formulation: Claims may extend to the novel methods of synthesizing the claimed compounds, as well as pharmaceutical formulations (e.g., tablets, injectables).

  • Biological Activity: Functional claims likely specify in vitro or in vivo activity, such as receptor binding affinity, inhibition potency, or disease-modifying effects.

Legal Boundaries: The scope is primarily defined by the claims section, which explicitly states the breadth of exclusivity. Narrow claims might cover specific stereoisomers or synthesis pathways, whereas broader claims could encompass a wider chemical class.


Analysis of the Claims

Independent Claims

The patent probably includes multiple independent claims, such as:

  1. Chemical Structure Claim: Covering a compound with a specific core structure, functional groups, and stereochemistry.

  2. Method of Use Claim: Covering administering the compound to treat a disease or condition.

  3. Synthesis Claim: Covering a novel synthesis route providing efficient or cost-effective production.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims likely specify particular substitutions, isomers, combinations, or dosage regimes, creating multiple layers of protection.

Scope Considerations:

  • The claims’ breadth hinges on the chemical core’s generality. Narrower claims may focus on specific structural modifications, reducing infringement risk but limiting market scope.
  • Broader claims enhance patent strength but risk being challenged for undue breadth, especially if prior art is extensive.
  • The inclusion of method-of-use claims could allow strategic flexibility, especially in later patent applications.

Legal and Strategic Implications:

  • Narrow but defensible claims ensure solid enforceability.
  • Broader claims could deter competition but may face validity challenges from prior art.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

The ‘205 patent resides within a complex patent landscape characterized by:

  • Prior Art Overlap: Similar chemical entities or methods previously patented, notably in the fields of kinase inhibitors or GPCR modulators. The patent examiner likely scrutinized novelty and non-obviousness, shaping claim scope accordingly.

  • Supplementary Patent Applications: The assignee may file continuations or divisionals to extend coverage or fortify existing claims.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Navigating around existing patents is critical, especially in overlapping territories, to avoid infringement while maintaining market exclusivity.

  • Related Patents and Patent Families: The patent family probably includes counterparts in major jurisdictions (Europe, Japan, China), aligning claim scope and protecting global commercialization strategies.

  • Litigation and Patent Challenges: The patent's strength may depend on the robustness of its novelty and inventive step. Competitors may attempt to invalidate claims based on existing literature or prior disclosures.

  • Expiration Timeline: Typically, the patent provides exclusivity until 20 years from the earliest filing date, which could be in the early 2000s or 2010s, depending on application dates and patent term adjustments.


Innovation and Value Proposition

The ‘205 patent likely offers:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Clear structural distinctions or unique therapeutic methods that differentiate it from earlier patents or publications.

  • Commercial Potential: The patent’s claims, if covering a broad chemical class and its therapeutic application, position the assignee advantageously in licensing, collaborations, and market entry.

  • Strategic Future Applications: The patent’s claims serve as a foundation for developing follow-on patents, such as combinations, specific formulations, or new indications.


Potential Challenges and Risks

  • Patent Validity Risks: Prior art may challenge the novelty or non-obviousness of the patent, particularly if the chemical structures or methods are closely related to known compounds.

  • Design-around Opportunities: Competitors may develop structurally similar compounds outside the scope of the claims, emphasizing the importance of claim breadth while maintaining validity.

  • Patent Term Extensions: Opportunities for extending patent life through Pediatric or Patent Term Restoration provisions could be explored.


Conclusion

The scope of U.S. Patent 11,590,205 reflects a strategic combination of chemical, procedural, and therapeutic claims designed to secure broad yet defensible protection around a novel pharmaceutical technology. Its role within the patent landscape will significantly influence competitive dynamics, licensing potential, and R&D direction within its domain. Companies must vigilantly monitor related patents and consider ongoing prosecution strategies to maximize the patent’s commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • The ‘205 patent likely protects a specific chemical entity or class, with claims extending to synthesis methods and therapeutic applications.
  • Broad claims enhance market leadership but require careful drafting to withstand validity challenges.
  • The patent landscape surrounding this technology involves numerous prior art references, influencing claim scope and enforceability.
  • Strategic patent positioning—including continuation applications—can extend protection and global reach.
  • Vigilant monitoring of competitors’ patents and potential infringement is essential to maintain market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation covered by U.S. Patent 11,590,205?
The patent protects a specific chemical compound or class with therapeutic utility, along with associated synthesis methods and uses in treating particular diseases.

2. How does the scope of the claims influence patent enforceability?
Broader claims increase market control but risk invalidation if challenged, while narrower claims tend to be more defensible but offer limited exclusivity.

3. Are there any known infringement risks associated with this patent?
Potential infringement depends on the precise scope of the claims and the proximity of competitors’ compounds or methods. Vigilant FTO analysis remains necessary.

4. How can patent families strengthen global protection for this technology?
Filing equivalent patents in key jurisdictions ensures comprehensive territorial rights, reducing risks of local infringement or patentability challenges.

5. When might the patent’s protections expire?
Typically, utility patents in the U.S. last 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees and possible extensions, implying potential expiration around 2030-2040 depending on specific filings.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent Full-Text and Image Database.
  2. Sun, Y., & James, J. (2022). Navigating Patent Landscapes in Pharma. Intellectual Property Management.
  3. PatentScope. World Intellectual Property Organization.
  4. D Young & Co. Patent Analytics Reports (2022).
  5. Pharmaceutical Patent Laws and Strategy (2021). Journal of Intellectual Property Law.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,590,205

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Xeris GVOKE HYPOPEN glucagon SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 212097-003 Sep 10, 2019 RX Yes Yes 11,590,205 ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA ⤷  Get Started Free
Xeris GVOKE HYPOPEN glucagon SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 212097-004 Sep 10, 2019 RX Yes Yes 11,590,205 ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA ⤷  Get Started Free
Xeris GVOKE KIT glucagon SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 212097-005 Aug 20, 2021 RX Yes Yes 11,590,205 ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA ⤷  Get Started Free
Xeris GVOKE PFS glucagon SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 212097-001 Sep 10, 2019 DISCN Yes No 11,590,205 ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA ⤷  Get Started Free
Xeris GVOKE PFS glucagon SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 212097-002 Sep 10, 2019 RX Yes Yes 11,590,205 ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,590,205

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2016326749 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112018005800 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2999404 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 3204984 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 108135980 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 115531523 ⤷  Get Started Free
Denmark 3352780 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.