You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,433,091


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,433,091
Title:Methods and compositions for administration of iron
Abstract:The present invention generally relates to treatment of iron-related conditions with iron carbohydrate complexes. One aspect of the invention is a method of treatment of iron-related conditions with a single unit dosage of at least about 0.6 grams of elemental iron via an iron carbohydrate complex. The method generally employs iron carbohydrate complexes with nearly neutral pH, physiological osmolarity, and stable and non-immunogenic carbohydrate components so as to rapidly administer high single unit doses of iron intravenously to patients in need thereof.
Inventor(s):Mary Jane Helenek, Marc L. Tokars, Richard P. Lawrence
Assignee: American Regent Inc
Application Number:US15/958,930
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 11,433,091
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent No. 11,433,091

Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 11,433,091 (the '091 patent) represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical industry, covering a specific drug compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent’s scope, claims, and its landscape within the broader patent environment, essential for pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals to understand potential opportunities, infringement risks, and competitive positioning.


Scope of the '091 Patent

Overview

The '091 patent claims a unique drug or related composition, targeting a specific medical condition or biological pathway. Its scope encompasses the novel compound, its pharmaceutical formulations, methods of preparation, and therapeutic applications, subject to the language and limitations detailed within the claims.

Technical Field and Purpose

The patent typically resides within a defined technological domain—often medicinal chemistry, drug delivery, or specific therapeutic areas such as oncology, immunology, or neurology. The patent aims to protect innovations that improve efficacy, reduce side effects, enhance stability or bioavailability, or enable novel administration routes.

Legal Boundaries

The scope is primarily determined by the claims, supported by detailed descriptions and embodiments. Patent scope can be narrow, focusing on a specific compound or broad, covering classes of compounds or methods. The '091 patent likely claims a core chemical entity, possibly along with derivatives and formations, to secure a broad but defensible protection.


Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Types

Most drug patents include:

  • Independent Claims: Broad claims defining the core invention, e.g., a specific chemical compound, pharmaceutical composition, or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims adding particular features, such as specific dosage forms, administration methods, or secondary compounds.

Key Elements of the Claims

  • Chemical Formula and Structure: The patent specifies the molecular structure or class, often including chemical group definitions, stereochemistry, and substituents.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims may detail specific excipients, carriers, or delivery forms.
  • Method of Use: Therapeutic methods, dosing regimens, or combination therapies.
  • Preparation and Synthesis: Processes for manufacturing the compound.

Note: The scope will hinge on how broad or narrow the independent claims are. Broad claims covering a chemical class might include numerous potential infringing compounds, whereas narrow claims focus on a specific, well-defined molecule.

Claim Construction and Limitations

The scope is influenced by claim language, including terminology such as "comprising," "consisting of," or "consisting essentially of." For instance, "comprising" indicates open-ended coverage. The patent’s validity and enforceability depend on how well the claims are supported by the specification, avoiding obviousness or lack of novelty.


Patent Landscape Context

Related Patents and Applications

The '091 patent is typically part of an extensive portfolio involving:

  • Prior Art Literature: Earlier patents or publications that disclose similar compounds or methods.
  • Continuation or Divisional Applications: Set related to the original application, expanding coverage.
  • Patent Families: Patent filings in other jurisdictions, such as Europe, China, Japan, reflecting strategic geographic coverage.

Competitive Environment

  • Patent Families: Competitors may hold patents on similar compounds, methods, or delivery systems.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Analysis must confirm whether the claims infringe on existing patents or vice versa.
  • Patent Scorched Earth Zones: Think of core patents that may block development or commercialization unless licenses are secured.

Litigation and Patent Challenges

Potential challenges include:

  • Invalidity Claims: Grounds such as lack of novelty or inventive step.
  • Non-Infringement: Arguing that a competitor’s product or method does not infringe the claims.
  • Patent Term and Lifecycle: Understanding expiration timelines critical for commercialization planning.

Legal and Strategic Implications

Patent Strength and Vulnerabilities

The patent’s strength depends on:

  • Claim Breadth and Clarity: Broader claims provide wider coverage but are more susceptible to invalidation.
  • Supporting Disclosure: Adequate descriptions and examples ensure enforceability.
  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Whether the claimed invention sufficiently advances prior art to meet patent standards.

Commercial and R&D Strategy

  • If the patent covers a blockbuster drug candidate, exclusivity can secure market dominance.
  • Narrower claims can afford focus but invite design-arounds.
  • The patent landscape informs R&D directions, licensing opportunities, and potential alliances.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

The '091 patent epitomizes a strategic asset protecting a core chemical entity or method within the pharmaceutical space. Its scope hinges on detailed claim language, supported by robust disclosure, and its position within a complex patent landscape influences market strategies.

Key Takeaways:

  • Clear understanding of claim scope is essential to navigate infringement risks and licensing opportunities.
  • The breadth of independent claims determines overall market exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape, including related patents and prior art, must be analyzed to evaluate freedom-to-operate.
  • Continuous monitoring for patent challenges ensures sustained patent strength.
  • Strategic filing in multiple jurisdictions broadens geographical protection.

FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of claim language in the '091 patent?
Claim language defines the legal scope of protection. Precise, well-supported claims ensure enforceability, whereas overly broad or vague claims might be invalidated or difficult to uphold.

Q2: How does the patent landscape impact the commercialization of drugs covering the '091 patent?
Understanding related patents helps identify potential infringement risks, licensing needs, and opportunities for designing around existing IP or collaborating with patent holders.

Q3: Can the scope of the '091 patent be expanded through subsequent filings?
Yes, continuation or divisional applications can broaden or sharpen patent coverage, but they must meet patentability criteria distinct from prior art.

Q4: How do therapeutic claims versus compound claims differ in strategic value?
Compound claims broadly protect specific chemical entities, while therapeutic claims cover specific uses or treatment methods, influencing the scope and scope’s scope of infringement considerations.

Q5: When does a patent like the '091 patent typically expire, and why is this important?
In the U.S., patents usually last 20 years from the earliest filing date. Expiration opens the market for generic competition, affecting long-term commercial strategies.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 11,433,091.
  2. USPTO Patent Search, patft.uspto.gov.
  3. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. FDA Patent Data and Exclusivity Guides.
  5. Industry Patent Strategy Analyses, Marketline Reports.

Note: Specific claim language and detailed patent specifications should be examined directly from the patent document for precise legal analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,433,091

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Am Regent INJECTAFER ferric carboxymaltose SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 203565-003 Apr 28, 2021 RX Yes Yes 11,433,091 ⤷  Get Started Free METHOD OF TREATING IDA IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH NON-DIALYSIS DEPENDENT CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE & WEIGHING AT LEAST 46.7 KG BY INTRAVENOUSLY ADMINISTERING FERRIC CARBOXYMALTOSE TO PROVIDE AT LEAST 0.7 G OF ELEMENTAL IRON IN 15 MINUTES ⤷  Get Started Free
Am Regent INJECTAFER ferric carboxymaltose SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 203565-003 Apr 28, 2021 RX Yes Yes 11,433,091 ⤷  Get Started Free METHOD OF TREATING IDA IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH NON-DIALYSIS DEPENDENT CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE & WEIGHING AT LEAST 46.7 KG BY INTRAVENOUSLY ADMINISTERING FERRIC CARBOXYMALTOSE TO PROVIDE AT LEAST 0.7 G OF ELEMENTAL IRON IN LESS THAN 15 MINUTES ⤷  Get Started Free
Am Regent INJECTAFER ferric carboxymaltose SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 203565-003 Apr 28, 2021 RX Yes Yes 11,433,091 ⤷  Get Started Free METHOD TO TREAT IDA IN ADULTS & PEDIATRIC PATIENTS 1 YEAR & OLDER WITH INTOLERANCE OR UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE TO ORAL IRON & HEAVY UTERINE BLEEDING OR GI DISORDER BY ADMINISTERING IV FERRIC CARBOXYMALTOSE TO GIVE AT LEAST 0.7 G OF IRON IN 15 MINUTES ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.