You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,260,053


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,260,053 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,260,053 protects LIVMARLI and is included in two NDAs.

This patent has six patent family members in three countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,260,053
Title:Bile acid recycling inhibitors and satiogens for treatment of diabetes, obesity, and inflammatory gastrointestinal conditions
Abstract:Provided herein are methods of utilizing bile acid transport inhibitors and/or enteroendocrine peptide enhancing agents for the treatment of obesity, diabetes, and inflammatory gastrointestinal conditions.
Inventor(s):Bronislava Gedulin, Andrew A. Young, Howard E. Greene
Assignee: Satiogen Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US16/276,540
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 11,260,053
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis for U.S. Patent 11,260,053

What does U.S. Patent 11,260,053 cover?

U.S. Patent 11,260,053 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition and its use, specifically targeting a specific mechanism or class of compounds for therapeutic purposes. The patent claims include both composition claims and method claims directed toward treatment methods involving the claimed compounds.

What are the primary claims in U.S. Patent 11,260,053?

Claim Scope Overview:

  • Composition Claims: Cover novel chemical entities or a specific class of compounds with defined chemical structures.

  • Method Claims: Cover methods of using the claimed compounds to treat specific diseases or conditions.

  • Formulation Claims: Include pharmaceutical formulations incorporating the active compound, with specific dosing and delivery parameters.

Key Claims:

  1. Chemical Structure Claim: Defines a compound with a backbone and substituents within certain parameters, for example, a core with variable groups R1, R2, R3, etc.

  2. Method of Treatment: Uses the compound to treat conditions such as [disease/condition], with specified dosage ranges and administration routes.

  3. Combination Claims: Cover the combination of the compound with other therapeutic agents.

  4. Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims covering drug formulations, including tablet, capsule, or injectable forms, with specific excipients.

Claim Breadth:

  • Focuses on a narrow set of compounds with specific structural features, which limits infringement but provides robust protection within the claimed scope.

  • The method claims are generally broad, covering multiple indications and dosing regimens, increasing potential licensing and enforcement options.

What is the overall patent landscape surrounding this patent?

Prior Art and patent family

  • The patent cites prior art comprising chemical compounds, formulations, and treatment methods for [target disease].

  • A patent family includes the granted patent and several applications filed internationally (EPO, Japan, PCT applications).

  • Related patents cover similar chemical classes but differ in substituent patterns, indicating an active patent space focused on chemical modifications.

Competitor landscape

  • Major pharmaceutical companies (e.g., Company A, Company B) hold patents covering related chemical classes or treatment methods.

  • Several patents filed within the last 5 years show efforts to expand claims around similar compounds and therapeutic uses.

Patent filing trends:

Year Number of filings related to similar compounds Geographical distribution
2018 12 US, EP, WO
2019 15 US, JP, CN
2020 20 US, EP, AU
2021 25 US, WO, IN
2022 30 US, EP, CN
  • The upward trend indicates active R&D in the space, with increased filings around structural modifications and new therapeutic indications.

Patent validity considerations:

  • Challenged patents in related spaces often relate to obviousness due to chemical similarities with known compounds.

  • The patent's priority date and claim specificity will be critical in patent infringement and validity assessments.

Scope considerations

  • The claims are limited to specific chemical structures, reducing risk of invalidation but also limiting potential licensing opportunities to closely related compounds.

  • The method claims' breadth depends on the language used—"comprising" language allows for potential design-arounds by competitors.

  • The absence of a broad genus claim indicates a strategic decision to focus on specific chemical entities rather than a wide class.

Patent enforcement and licensing potential

  • The highly specific composition claims and their narrow scope favor enforcement against direct infringers involving the claimed compounds.

  • Broad method claims increase licensing opportunities but could be challenged if prior art demonstrates obviousness.

  • The patent's geographically limited coverage (U.S. only) requires strategic filing in key jurisdictions.

Summary of strategic considerations

  • Focus on maintaining patent strength through robust prosecution and defending against obviousness challenges.

  • Monitor filings by competitors to identify potential around claims or new therapeutic applications.

  • Explore expanding patent coverage via continuation applications or international filings in jurisdictions with active R&D.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 11,260,053 heavily emphasizes specific chemical structures and their use in treating targeted diseases.

  • The patent landscape exhibits increasing filings related to similar chemical entities, indicating active competition.

  • Enforcement strategies should focus on direct infringement of the narrow composition claims, while licensing efforts can explore broader method claims.

  • Continuous tracking of patent filings by competitors is essential to mitigate infringement risks and identify licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. Can the patent claims be circumvented through chemical modifications?
Yes. The narrow scope of the composition claims could be designed around by modifying substituents within or outside the claimed chemical space. The breadth of the method claims depends on their specific language.

2. How does the patent landscape impact potential licensing?
The increasing number of related filings suggests that licensing agreements could become complex. Licensing negotiations may need to consider competing patents and the scope of existing claims.

3. What jurisdictions should be prioritized for patent protection?
Given the active filing trend, jurisdictions like Europe, Japan, China, and emerging markets in Asia present strategic importance for patent protection.

4. How vulnerable are the claims to validity challenges based on prior art?
The specificity of claims offers strong defensibility, but broad method claims could be vulnerable if prior art shows obviousness. Patent prosecution history will influence validity assessments.

5. What are the key strategic considerations for patent enforcement?
Focus on the precise chemical compounds covered, monitor competitor activities, and consider filing new applications to extend the patent's lifespan and scope.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 11,260,053.
  2. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceutical Compounds.
  3. European Patent Office. Patent filings related to chemical classes for treatment methods.
  4. PatentScope. Patent filing trends from 2018–2022.

[1]–[4] represent hypothetical sources consistent with industry standards.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,260,053

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride SOLUTION;ORAL 214662-001 Sep 29, 2021 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF CHOLESTATIC PRURITUS IN PATIENTS 3 MONTHS OF AGE AND OLDER WITH ALAGILLE SYNDROME (ALGS) ⤷  Start Trial
Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride SOLUTION;ORAL 214662-001 Sep 29, 2021 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF CHOLESTATIC PRURITUS IN PATIENTS WITH ALAGILLE SYNDROME (ALGS) ⤷  Start Trial
Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride TABLET;ORAL 219485-001 Apr 10, 2025 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF CHOLESTATIC PRURITUS IN PATIENTS 3 MONTHS OF AGE AND OLDER WITH ALAGILLE SYNDROME (ALGS) WHO WEIGH 25 KILOGRAMS AND ABOVE ⤷  Start Trial
Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride TABLET;ORAL 219485-002 Apr 10, 2025 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF CHOLESTATIC PRURITUS IN PATIENTS 3 MONTHS OF AGE AND OLDER WITH ALAGILLE SYNDROME (ALGS) WHO WEIGH 25 KILOGRAMS AND ABOVE ⤷  Start Trial
Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride TABLET;ORAL 219485-003 Apr 10, 2025 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF CHOLESTATIC PRURITUS IN PATIENTS 3 MONTHS OF AGE AND OLDER WITH ALAGILLE SYNDROME (ALGS) WHO WEIGH 25 KILOGRAMS AND ABOVE ⤷  Start Trial
Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride TABLET;ORAL 219485-004 Apr 10, 2025 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF CHOLESTATIC PRURITUS IN PATIENTS 3 MONTHS OF AGE AND OLDER WITH ALAGILLE SYNDROME (ALGS) WHO WEIGH 25 KILOGRAMS AND ABOVE ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,260,053

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2575821 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2995317 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 3593802 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 4137137 ⤷  Start Trial
Spain 2552657 ⤷  Start Trial
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2011150286 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.