You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: May 24, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,213,504


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,213,504 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,213,504 protects VASCEPA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fifty-one patent family members in twenty-seven countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,213,504
Title:Stable pharmaceutical composition and methods of using same
Abstract: The present invention relates to, inter alia, pharmaceutical compositions comprising a polyunsaturated fatty acid and to methods of using the same to treat or prevent cardiovascular-related diseases.
Inventor(s): Manku; Mehar (Birmingham, GB), Osterloh; Ian (Kent, GB), Wicker; Pierre (Mystic, CT), Braeckman; Rene (Richboro, PA), Soni; Paresh (Mystic, CT)
Assignee: Amarin Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited (Dublin, IE)
Application Number:17/137,713
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of a US Patent: A Detailed Guide Using US Patent 11,213,504 as an Example

Introduction

When navigating the complex world of patents, understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial. This article will delve into the intricacies of patent claims and the broader patent landscape, using US Patent 11,213,504 as a case study.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent application, defining the scope of protection sought by the inventor. Here are some key points to consider:

Claim Scope and Broadness

A common misconception is that broader claims are always better. However, overly broad claims can be risky and may lead to invalidation due to issues like the abstract idea exception or failure to meet the written description requirement[3].

Anchoring Claims to the Specification

Claims must be anchored to the embodiments disclosed in the specification. This ensures that the claims are not overly broad and are supported by the invention described in the patent application[3].

The Importance of Prior Art Search

Before drafting claims, it is essential to conduct a thorough prior art search to ensure the invention is novel and nonobvious.

Tools for Prior Art Search

The USPTO provides several tools for conducting prior art searches, including the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and the Public Search Facility. These resources help in identifying existing patents and published patent applications that could affect the novelty of your invention[1].

Case Study: US Patent 11,213,504

To illustrate the analysis, let's consider a hypothetical example using US Patent 11,213,504, though the actual details of this patent are not provided here.

Identifying the Invention

Start by identifying the core invention described in the patent specification. This involves understanding the problem the invention solves, the specific embodiments, and any variations or alternatives mentioned.

Analyzing the Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. They are crucial in determining the scope of protection.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to an independent claim and further limit the scope of the invention. They often provide additional details or specific embodiments.

Claim Construction

Claim construction involves interpreting the language of the claims to understand their scope. This process is critical in determining what is covered by the patent and what is not. The Federal Circuit has established guidelines for claim construction, emphasizing the importance of the claim language and the specification[3].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the broader patent landscape is vital for several reasons:

Competitor Analysis

Identifying patents held by competitors can help in understanding the competitive landscape and potential infringement risks. Tools like the Global Dossier and Patent Public Search can be used to analyze patent families and related applications across different jurisdictions[1].

Technology Trends

Analyzing patent trends can provide insights into technological advancements and areas of innovation. For example, the USPTO classifies patents into 35 technical fields, which can be aggregated to analyze trends over time. Electrical and mechanical engineering patents, for instance, have seen significant growth between 2000 and 2018[4].

International Patent Offices

To ensure global protection, it is essential to search international patent databases. Resources like the European Patent Office's esp@cenet, the Japan Patent Office, and WIPO's PATENTSCOPE provide access to international patent applications and granted patents[1].

Legal and Policy Considerations

The legal and policy environment surrounding patents is constantly evolving.

Abstract Idea Exception

The abstract idea exception, as established by the Supreme Court in the Alice decision, is a significant consideration. Claims that are too broad and directed to abstract ideas rather than specific improvements in technology may be invalidated[3].

Small Claims Patent Court

There have been discussions and studies on the feasibility of a small claims patent court to address the high costs and complexities associated with patent litigation. This could potentially impact how patent disputes are resolved in the future[2].

Best Practices for Drafting Claims

Precision and Specificity

Claims should be precise and specific to avoid ambiguity and potential invalidation. Overly broad claims can lead to preemption concerns and are more likely to be challenged[3].

Support from the Specification

Ensure that the claims are well-supported by the specification. This includes providing detailed descriptions and examples that anchor the claims to the invention[3].

International Considerations

When drafting claims, consider the international patent landscape. Claims that are too broad may face different legal challenges in various jurisdictions[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Conduct Thorough Prior Art Searches: Use tools like the Patent Public Search and Global Dossier to ensure novelty and nonobviousness.
  • Precision in Claim Drafting: Avoid overly broad claims and ensure they are anchored to the specification.
  • Understand the Patent Landscape: Analyze competitor patents and technological trends to position your invention effectively.
  • Stay Updated on Legal and Policy Changes: Be aware of changes like the abstract idea exception and potential reforms such as a small claims patent court.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of prior art search in patent applications? A: Prior art search is crucial to ensure the novelty and nonobviousness of the invention, helping to avoid potential invalidation of the patent.

Q: How do you determine the scope of a patent claim? A: The scope of a patent claim is determined by interpreting the claim language in the context of the specification and any relevant prior art.

Q: What are the risks of overly broad patent claims? A: Overly broad claims can lead to invalidation due to issues like the abstract idea exception or failure to meet the written description requirement.

Q: How can you analyze the patent landscape for a specific technology area? A: Use tools like the USPTO's classification system and international patent databases to analyze trends and competitor activity in a specific technology area.

Q: What is the significance of the abstract idea exception in patent law? A: The abstract idea exception prevents patents from granting a monopoly over abstract ideas, ensuring that only specific improvements in technology are patented.

Cited Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. ACUS - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court: https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court
  3. Rimon Law - The Importance of Getting the Claim Scope Right in a US Patent Application: https://www.rimonlaw.com/the-importance-of-getting-the-claim-scope-right-in-a-us-patent-application-i/
  4. NCSES - Invention: U.S. and Comparative Global Trends: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20204/invention-u-s-and-comparative-global-trends

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,213,504

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Amarin Pharms VASCEPA icosapent ethyl CAPSULE;ORAL 202057-001 Jul 26, 2012 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free USE OF VASCEPA TO REDUCE TRIGLYCERIDE LEVELS IN AN ADULT PATIENT ON STATIN THERAPY AND HAVING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION OR ATRIAL FLUTTER AND TRIGLYCERIDE LEVELS OF ABOUT 500 MG/DL TO ABOUT 2,000 MG/DL ⤷  Try for Free
Amarin Pharms VASCEPA icosapent ethyl CAPSULE;ORAL 202057-002 Feb 16, 2017 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free USE OF VASCEPA TO REDUCE TRIGLYCERIDE LEVELS IN AN ADULT PATIENT ON STATIN THERAPY AND HAVING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION OR ATRIAL FLUTTER AND TRIGLYCERIDE LEVELS OF ABOUT 500 MG/DL TO ABOUT 2,000 MG/DL ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,213,504

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2010241571 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil PI1011876 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2759284 ⤷  Try for Free
China 102458109 ⤷  Try for Free
China 104856985 ⤷  Try for Free
Colombia 6470838 ⤷  Try for Free
Cyprus 1119596 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.