You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: June 18, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,103,483


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,103,483
Title:Formulations of bendamustine
Abstract: Long term storage stable bendamustine-containing compositions are disclosed. The compositions can include bendamustine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and a pharmaceutically acceptable fluid which can include in some embodiments PEG, PG or mixtures thereof and an antioxidant or chloride ion source. The bendamustine-containing compositions have less than about 5% total impurities, on a normalized peak area response ("PAR") basis as determined by high performance liquid chromatography ("HPLC") at a wavelength of 223 nm, after at least about 15 months of storage at a temperature of from about 5.degree. C. to about 25.degree. C.
Inventor(s): Palepu; Nagesh R. (Southampton, PA), Buxton; Philip Christopher (Uxbridge, GB)
Assignee: Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Woodcliff Lake, NJ)
Application Number:16/509,920
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 11,103,483

Introduction

United States Patent 11,103,483, titled "Formulations of Bendamustine," is a significant intellectual property asset for Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This patent has been at the center of several legal battles and strategic maneuvers in the pharmaceutical industry. Here, we delve into the details of the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

Patent Overview

The patent, granted on August 31, 2021, by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, pertains to specific formulations of bendamustine, a chemotherapy drug used in the treatment of certain cancers. Eagle Pharmaceuticals has submitted this patent for listing in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Orange Book for both BENDEKA® and BELRAPZO®[1].

Claims of the Patent

The patent includes several claims, with particular focus on claims 2 and 4, which are central to the litigation involving Eagle Pharmaceuticals and other pharmaceutical companies.

Claim 1

Claim 1 is the independent claim from which claims 2 and 4 depend. It describes a "ready to use liquid bendamustine-containing composition" with the following specifications:

  • Bendamustine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, with a concentration from about 10 mg/mL to about 100 mg/mL.
  • Polyethylene glycol.
  • A stabilizing amount of an antioxidant.
  • The composition must have less than about 5% peak area response of total impurities resulting from the degradation of bendamustine, as determined by HPLC at a wavelength of 223 nm after at least 15 months at a temperature of about 25° C[4].

Claims 2 and 4

These claims are dependent on claim 1 and specify additional limitations. They cover the "ready to use" liquid bendamustine-containing composition, emphasizing the stability and purity of the formulation[4].

Patent Scope

The scope of the patent is defined by the claims and the specifications provided. Here are some key aspects:

Stability and Purity

The patent emphasizes the stability and purity of the bendamustine formulation. The composition must have less than about 5% peak area response of total impurities, ensuring a high level of purity and stability over time[4].

Ready to Use

The "ready to use" limitation is crucial, as it distinguishes the patented formulation from others that may require additional preparation steps. This ready-to-use aspect is a significant factor in the infringement analysis[4].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent landscape analysis provides a comprehensive view of the technological domain and competitive landscape.

Legal Status

The patent is currently active and has been listed in the FDA's Orange Book. It is expected to expire in 2031, along with other asserted patents related to BENDEKA and BELRAPZO[1].

Litigation and Opposition

The patent has been involved in several litigation cases, notably against Slayback Pharma LLC, Apotex Inc., Mylan Laboratories Limited, and Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC. These cases revolve around the infringement of the patent claims by the defendants' abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the validity and infringement of the asserted patents in August 2021[1][4].

Market Developments

The patent landscape analysis also reveals market developments such as mergers and acquisitions, in/out-licensing, and opposition activities. For instance, Eagle Pharmaceuticals settled the litigation with Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, before the appellate hearing[1].

Competitive Insights

Patent landscape studies offer valuable insights into competitors and market trends.

Competitor Analysis

Companies like Apotex and Mylan have been actively involved in challenging the validity and infringement of Eagle's patents. This competitive activity highlights the strategic importance of these patents in the market[1][4].

Market Trends

The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive, and patents like U.S. Patent 11,103,483 play a crucial role in protecting market share. The trend of litigation and opposition activities indicates a high level of competition in the bendamustine market[5].

Impact on Innovation

The scope and claims of the patent can influence innovation in the pharmaceutical sector.

Patent Quality and Scope

Debates over patent quality often focus on the breadth and clarity of patent claims. Narrower claims, like those in U.S. Patent 11,103,483, are generally associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process. This can encourage more focused innovation rather than overly broad claims that might stifle competition[3].

Licensing and Litigation Costs

The patent's involvement in several litigation cases highlights the significant costs associated with licensing and litigation. These costs can impact the incentives for innovation, as companies may need to allocate substantial resources to defend their intellectual property rights[3].

Expert Insights

Industry experts and legal professionals play a crucial role in interpreting and enforcing patent claims.

Expert Testimony

In the litigation involving Eagle Pharmaceuticals, expert witnesses like Dr. Graham Sewell have provided testimony on the technical aspects of the patent claims. Such expert insights are critical in construing disputed patent terms and determining infringement[4].

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 11,103,483 is a pivotal asset for Eagle Pharmaceuticals, protecting its formulations of bendamustine. The patent's scope, defined by its claims, emphasizes the stability, purity, and ready-to-use nature of the bendamustine composition. The patent landscape analysis reveals a competitive market with significant litigation and opposition activities. Understanding this patent and its implications is crucial for navigating the pharmaceutical industry and ensuring compliance with intellectual property rights.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: The patent covers specific formulations of bendamustine with emphasis on stability, purity, and ready-to-use composition.
  • Claims: Claims 2 and 4 are central to the litigation and depend on the independent claim 1.
  • Litigation: The patent has been involved in several high-profile litigation cases, affirming its validity and infringement.
  • Market Insights: Patent landscape analysis provides valuable insights into competitors and market trends.
  • Innovation Impact: The patent's scope and claims can influence innovation by encouraging focused and clear claims.

FAQs

Q: What is the main subject of U.S. Patent 11,103,483? A: The main subject is specific formulations of bendamustine, a chemotherapy drug.

Q: Which companies have been involved in litigation over this patent? A: Companies include Slayback Pharma LLC, Apotex Inc., Mylan Laboratories Limited, and Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC.

Q: What is the significance of the "ready to use" limitation in the patent claims? A: The "ready to use" limitation distinguishes the patented formulation from others that may require additional preparation steps.

Q: When is the patent expected to expire? A: The patent is expected to expire in 2031.

Q: How does the patent landscape analysis benefit companies in the pharmaceutical industry? A: It provides valuable insights into competitors, market trends, and potential risks and opportunities, helping companies make informed decisions.

Sources

  1. Eagle Pharmaceuticals Granted Additional Patent for Bendamustine - Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  2. In the United States District Court - District of Delaware
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope - SSRN
  4. 21-1256.pdf - District of Delaware
  5. Navigating Technological Domains with Patent Landscape Analysis - Sagacious Research

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,103,483

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Eagle Pharms BELRAPZO bendamustine hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 205580-001 May 15, 2018 AP RX Yes Yes 11,103,483 ⤷  Try for Free Y FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA ⤷  Try for Free
Eagle Pharms BELRAPZO bendamustine hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 205580-001 May 15, 2018 AP RX Yes Yes 11,103,483 ⤷  Try for Free Y FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH INDOLENT B-CELL NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA ⤷  Try for Free
Eagle Pharms BENDEKA bendamustine hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 208194-001 Dec 7, 2015 RX Yes Yes 11,103,483 ⤷  Try for Free Y FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA ⤷  Try for Free
Eagle Pharms BENDEKA bendamustine hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 208194-001 Dec 7, 2015 RX Yes Yes 11,103,483 ⤷  Try for Free Y FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH INDOLENT B-CELL NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,103,483

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 2787568 ⤷  Try for Free
Cyprus 1118769 ⤷  Try for Free
Cyprus 1124262 ⤷  Try for Free
Denmark 2528602 ⤷  Try for Free
Denmark 3158991 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.