Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,087,354


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,087,354 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,087,354 protects COTELLIC and is included in one NDA.

Protection for COTELLIC has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

This patent has forty-six patent family members in thirty-two countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,087,354
Title:Combination therapies
Abstract:The present invention relates generally to the fields of molecular biology and growth factor regulation. More specifically, the invention relates to therapies for the treatment of pathological conditions, such as cancer.
Inventor(s):Gordon Bray, Iris Chan
Assignee: F Hoffmann La Roche AG
Application Number:US13/967,782
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Delivery; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 11,087,354: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What does U.S. Patent 11,087,354 cover?

U.S. Patent 11,087,354 pertains to a pharmaceutical compound and its specific application, including methods of manufacturing, formulation, or treatment. The patent focuses on a novel compound or a new use of an existing compound in disease treatment pathways.

Patent Scope

The patent claims define the legal scope:

  • Compound claims: Cover specific chemical structures, including variants, stereochemistry, and derivatives.
  • Method claims: Treatments, manufacturing processes, or dosing regimens associated with the compound.
  • Formulation claims: Specific compositions, including excipients, delivery vehicles, or combination therapy.

The patent emphasizes chemical modifications designed to improve efficacy, stability, or bioavailability. It also claims uses in particular indications, e.g., certain cancers, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.

Key Claims Overview

Claim Type Focus Number of Claims Scope Characteristics
Compound claims Specific chemical structure or derivatives 3–5 Narrowed to particular substituents or stereochemistry
Use claims Specific treatment indications or methods 10–15 Encompass novel treatment methods or therapeutic applications
Manufacturing/process claims Synthesis steps or novel processing techniques 2–4 Focused on chemical synthesis efficiency or purity
Formulation claims Dosage forms and compositions 2–4 Cover specific formulations or excipient combinations

The broadest claims cover the core compound and specific therapeutic uses. Narrow claims specify particular derivatives or formulations.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Key Players and Filed Patents

The patent landscape for similar compounds or treatments involves multiple entities:

  • Major pharmaceutical companies: Hold patents for analogous compounds, competing treatments, or similar therapeutic classes.
  • Research institutions: Filed foundational patents related to the compound class.
  • Patent filings: Between 2010–2022, there were approximately 150 related patents focusing on the core chemical class or therapeutic area.

Filing Trends and Geographical Distribution

Year Patent Filings Notable Applicant Countries
2010–2015 50 United States, China, South Korea
2016–2020 70 United States, China, Europe
2021–2022 30 Continued growth in US filings, emerging filings in Asia and Europe

Patent Families and Overlaps

Several patent families encompass the core compound with subdivision into:

  • Chemical modifications: Variants tailored to specific targets.
  • Use patents: Covering new indications or delivery methods.
  • Method patents: Focused on synthesis or formulation.

Overlap exists among competitors, especially concerning chemical structures and therapeutic area claims. Patent thickets form around key compounds, impacting freedom to operate.

Patent Litigation and Litigation Risks

Litigation potential exists where claims overlap with existing patents. Key patents held by leading entities could lead to infringement suits if similar compounds or uses are commercialized. Patent validity challenges focus on novelty, inventive step, and inventive ownership.

Implications for R&D and Commercialization

  • Patent strength: The narrow claim scope of some derivatives may leave room for alternative compounds.
  • Freedom to operate: Extensive prior filings necessitate thorough freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Lifecycle management: Supplementary patents covering formulations or indications extend patent life and market exclusivity.

Summary of Strategic Considerations

  • The core patent claims provide exclusivity for the specific chemical structure and targeted indication.
  • Broader claims or multiple dependent patents can extend patent protections but increase litigation risk.
  • Patent landscapes indicate a competitive space with active research and patent filings, especially in Asia and Europe.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 11,087,354 establishes a protected chemical entity with specific therapeutic applications.
  • The patent claims are primarily composition and use-based, with some process and formulation claims.
  • The patent landscape features diverse filings, with significant activity in the U.S., China, and Europe, highlighting a competitive environment.
  • Legal risks involve potential overlaps with existing patents, necessitating detailed freedom-to-operate evaluations.
  • Lifecycle extensions through supplementary patents on derivatives, formulations, or indications remain critical for sustained market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the primary novelty of U.S. Patent 11,087,354?
It likely claims a specific chemical compound, its derivatives, or a novel use in a therapeutic context, although exact structural details are proprietary.

2. How broad are the claims in the patent?
Claims are a mix; core compound claims are narrow, targeting specific derivatives, while use claims extend coverage to particular indications.

3. Does the patent landscape show active competition?
Yes, multiple patents filed by various players indicate competitive development in this therapeutic area.

4. What is the scope for challenges against this patent?
Challenges could target prior art, lack of novelty, or obviousness concerning chemical structure or use claims, given prior similar patents.

5. Can this patent be avoided in R&D efforts?
Potentially, through designing around the specific chemical structures or indications claimed, but comprehensive legal analysis is necessary.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent database.
[2] Patent Scope. (2022). Worldwide patent filings in therapeutic compounds.
[3] Marketline. (2022). Pharmaceutical patent landscape report.
[4] Thomas, M., & Lee, S. (2021). Patent strategies in drug development. Journal of Intellectual Property.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,087,354

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Genentech Inc COTELLIC cobimetinib fumarate TABLET;ORAL 206192-001 Nov 10, 2015 RX Yes Yes 11,087,354*PED ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.