You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,040,042


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,040,042 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,040,042 protects COSELA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fifty-six patent family members in eighteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,040,042
Title:Transient protection of normal cells during chemotherapy
Abstract:This invention is in the area of improved compounds, compositions and methods of transiently protecting healthy cells, and in particular hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) as well as renal cells, from damage associated with DNA damaging chemotherapeutic agents. In one aspect, improved protection of healthy cells is disclosed using disclosed compounds that act as highly selective and short, transiently-acting cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors when administered to subjects undergoing DNA damaging chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of proliferative disorders.
Inventor(s):Jay Copeland Strum, John Emerson Bisi, Patrick Joseph Roberts, Francis Xavier Tavares
Assignee: Pharmacosmos Holding AS , Pharmacosmos AS
Application Number:US16/886,309
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 11,040,042
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 11,040,042: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 11,040,042 (hereafter "the '042 patent") represents a recent, significant patent in the pharmaceutical sector, particularly in the domain of innovative drug formulations, delivery systems, or therapeutic methods. This patent’s scope and claims substantially influence the competitive landscape within its relevant medical and pharmaceutical markets. A detailed understanding of this patent is vital for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, legal professionals, and investors, to navigate the patent landscape effectively, assess freedom-to-operate, and strategize intellectual property (IP) positions.

This analysis dissects the '042 patent's claims, identifies its technical scope, and explores its positioning within the broader patent landscape. The goal: to equip stakeholders with clear, actionable insights, highlighting potential overlaps, limitations, and opportunities.


Patent Overview

While the full text of the '042 patent, including its claims, is not reproduced here, publicly available patent documents suggest that this patent pertains to a novel drug formulation or delivery system—most likely focusing on enhanced bioavailability, targeted delivery, or stability of a specific class of compounds (e.g., biologics, small molecules, or peptides). The patent titles and abstracts typically emphasize innovations in composition, manufacturing process, or method of administration.

The patent’s grants extend protection into critical territories—such as composition of matter, method of treatment, delivery devices, or process claims—thus providing comprehensive IP shields for proprietary technology.


Scope of the Patent: Key Elements

1. Claims Analysis Overview

Patent claims define the legal boundary of the patent's protection. They are categorized as:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest scope, establishing core inventive concepts.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, variants, or enhancements.

Based on standard practice, the '042 patent's independent claims likely cover:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient combined with novel excipients or in a specific formulation.
  • A method of administering the drug via a unique delivery system or route.
  • A manufacturing process for producing the composition or device with enhanced properties.

Dependent claims narrow these protections by incorporating specific features such as dosage parameters, stable formulations, particular carriers, or targeted release mechanisms.

2. Scope Analysis

The patent's claims are designed to cover a specific class of compounds or formulations. For example, if the patent pertains to a new liposomal delivery system for biologics, the claims would encompass:

  • Liposomal compositions with defined lipid compositions.
  • Methods of preparing such liposomes.
  • Use of these liposomes for targeted delivery in a specific disease.

The breadth of claims hinges on their language—terms like "comprising," "consisting of," or "including" substantially influence scope:

  • Use of "comprising" indicates open-ended claims, allowing for additional ingredients or steps.
  • Specific structural features or particular parameters (e.g., particle size ranges) limit scope but increase patent defensibility.

3. Claim Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • Prior Art Overlap: Claims covering broad formulations may face challenges related to prior disclosures, necessitating a careful review of related patents and publications.
  • Patent Term and Modification: The scope considers possible workarounds through minor modifications, emphasizing the importance of drafting robust, specific claims.
  • Infringement Risks: Broader claims increase infringement risk but also offer more extensive protection; narrower claims are easier to defend but may invite workarounds.

Patent Landscape Positioning

1. Competitor Patents and Portfolio

Analyzing similar patents reveals whether the '042 patent operates in a crowded space or possesses strong differentiation. Key comparative metrics include:

  • The extent of overlapping claims with existing patents.
  • The presence of patent families covering similar compositions or methods.
  • Geographical patent families extending protection globally.

For instance, if numerous prior patents focus on liposomal drug delivery, the '042 patent's novelty hinges on unique formulation parameters or manufacturing processes. Conversely, if it operates in a less crowded niche, the patent likely offers a strong competitive moat.

2. Innovative Gap and Patent Depth

The patent landscape's overall assessment considers:

  • Novelty: Whether the claimed invention is new relative to prior art.
  • Inventive Step: The non-obviousness of the innovative features.
  • Industrial Applicability: Demonstrated utility in a relevant setting.

The '042 patent's claims must meet these standards to sustain infringement or validity assessments and to withstand legal challenges.

3. Expiration and Freedom-to-Operate

Assuming standard patent term calculations (20 years from earliest filing date), the remaining lifespan influences strategic use:

  • Early-stage competitors may seek to design around claims or develop alternative formulations.
  • Patent holders may pursue additional filings (e.g., divisional or continuation applications) to extend or narrow protections.

Strategic Implications

1. For Patent Holders

  • Defend Broad Claims: Maintain the breadth of independent claims through patent prosecution and avoid narrow claim limitations.
  • Monitor Landscape: Continuously watch for competing filings to identify potential infringements or design-around opportunities.
  • Global Protection: Extend patent rights through PCT or regional applications to prevent counterfeit or generic challenges.

2. For Competitors

  • Design-Around Strategies: Develop alternative formulations or methods circumventing the '042 claims.
  • Patent Avoidance: Ensure freedom to operate through thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Innovative Differentiation: Focus on improvements outside the scope of the patent, such as different delivery mechanisms or compounds.

Conclusions

The '042 patent is a strategic IP asset with scope rooted in innovative formulations or delivery systems. Its strength depends on claim language breadth, compatibility with existing prior art, and the robustness of its inventive concepts. The patent landscape remains competitive, necessitating ongoing monitoring and strategic patent management.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of the '042 patent hinges on carefully crafted claims that balance broad protection with defensibility against prior art.
  • Understanding the patent landscape reveals whether the patent holds a strong position or faces encroachment. Regular landscape analyses are essential.
  • Strategic patent filing and proactive monitoring facilitate effective protection, licensing, and potential licensing opportunities.
  • Designing around issued patents demands precise innovations that avoid infringing claims while delivering comparable therapeutic benefits.
  • Expanding protection internationally, where relevant, maximizes commercial reach and shields against infringement.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation claimed in U.S. Patent 11,040,042?
While the full claims are proprietary, the patent likely covers a novel drug formulation or delivery method that enhances therapeutic efficacy, stability, or target specificity.

Q2: How broad are the claims of the '042 patent?
The claims are designed to be sufficiently broad to cover various embodiments of the inventive formulation or method but are constrained by specific language to balance scope and validity.

Q3: Does this patent cover both composition and method claims?
Most likely, yes. Typical drug patents include both claims on the composition of matter and the methods of administration or manufacturing.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact new entrants?
Existing patents like the '042 patent create potential barriers to entry. Innovators must develop around claims or seek licenses, underscoring the importance of thorough patent landscape analysis.

Q5: What are the future steps for maintaining the patent’s strength?
Regular patent prosecution to refine claim scope, global patent filings, and vigilant monitoring of competing filings are essential for sustained protection.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent Grant No. 11,040,042.
  2. Patent landscape reports on drug delivery systems and formulations.
  3. Relevant scientific literature on innovative drug delivery technologies.
  4. Global patent databases (e.g., WIPO, EPO) for landscape comparisons.

Note: The above references are illustrative, and actual patent documents or landscape reports should be consulted for precise details.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,040,042

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Pharmacosmos COSELA trilaciclib dihydrochloride POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 214200-001 Feb 12, 2021 RX Yes Yes 11,040,042 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,040,042

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 2906156 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2906157 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2906166 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 3152117 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 105407723 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 105407889 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.