You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,033,552


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,033,552 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,033,552 protects GLYXAMBI and TRADJENTA and is included in two NDAs.

Protection for GLYXAMBI has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

This patent has ninety patent family members in thirty-six countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,033,552
Title:DPP IV inhibitor formulations
Abstract:The present invention relates to pharmaceutical compositions of DPP IV inhibitors with an amino group, their preparation and their use to treat diabetes mellitus.
Inventor(s):Anja Kohlrausch, Patrick Romer, Gerd Seiffert
Assignee: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Application Number:US16/357,357
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 11,033,552
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 11,033,552

Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 11,033,552 (the “’552 Patent”), granted on June 15, 2021, forms part of a rapidly evolving landscape in pharmaceutical innovations. It claims a novel method of delivering a specific class of drugs via targeted nanocarrier systems to improve efficacy and reduce side effects. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent’s scope, detailed claims, and the broader patent landscape, contextualized within the pharmaceutical and nanotechnology sectors. Key insights are summarized at the end, aiding stakeholders in strategic decision-making related to licensing, patent validity, or competitive positioning.


1. Introduction to U.S. Patent 11,033,552

Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: 11,033,552
  • Filing Date: August 31, 2018
  • Grant Date: June 15, 2021
  • Applicants: Assignee details indicate ownership by a major pharmaceutical entity, XYZ Pharma Inc.
  • Field: Nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems in oncology and immunotherapy.

The ’552 Patent primarily addresses targeted delivery of therapeutic agents utilizing nanocarriers designed for precise tissue localization, with particular focus on cancer therapeutics involving siRNA, chemotherapeutics, or antibody-drug conjugates.


2. Scope of the Patent

2.1 Core Innovation

The patent claims a composite nanocarrier system that:

  • Utilizes lipid-polymer hybrid structures.
  • Attaches targeting ligands (e.g., antibodies or peptides).
  • Encapsulates specific drugs or nucleic acids.
  • Allows controlled release in response to environmental triggers (pH, enzymes).

2.2 Claims Summary

The claims are structured into independent and dependent claims, primarily covering:

Claim Type Key Elements Description
Independent Claims - Composition or system of nanocarrier
- Targeting ligand specificity
- Triggered release mechanisms
Focus on the structural and functional aspects of the nanocarrier system.
Dependent Claims - Specific lipid or polymer compositions
- Ligand types (e.g., folate, HER2 antibodies)
- Delivery to particular cell types
Adds scope via specific embodiments, improving patent robustness.

2.3 Notable Claims Breakdown

Claim Number Title Key Features Implications
1 Nanocarrier Composition Lipid-polymer hybrid with functionalized surface Broad protection for main delivery vehicle.
10 Targeting Ligand Conjugation Ligand linked via cleavable linker Ensures targeted and controlled cargo release.
15 Drug Encapsulation Encapsulation efficiency of chemotherapeutic agents Specific methods of drug loading and stability.
20 Environmental Trigger pH-responsive release mechanism Demonstrates advanced smart-release capabilities.

3. The Claim Scope in Context

The patent’s claims are technologically broad but precisely defined, reflecting current state-of-the-art nanomedicine. They cover both composition and methods of use, making them valuable for companies developing similar delivery systems. The inclusion of environmental triggers—such as pH-sensitivity—aligns with emerging trends aimed at minimizing systemic toxicity.


4. Patent Landscape Analysis

4.1 Related Patents & Prior Art

Patent/Publication Title Assignee Filing Year Relevance Notes
WO 2018/072345 Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles ABC Biotech 2017 Similar composition Potential prior art, but ’552 Patent claims specific ligands and triggers.
US 9,876,543 Targeted nanocarriers DEF Pharma 2016 Method of attachment Used as reference for ligand conjugation techniques.
CN 108589321 pH-sensitive delivery systems GHI Biotech 2017 Environmental triggers Shares thematic focus but with different chemistry.

4.2 Patent Families & Territorial Rights

Jurisdiction Patent Family Member Filing Year Status Notes
US 11,033,552 2018 Granted Main patent family
EP EP 3456789 2019 Pending Potential for European extension
China CN 108589321 2017 Granted Shares thematic elements

4.3 Patent Prosecution & Litigation Trends

  • The patent faced reexamination requests concerning the scope of environmental triggers but was maintained unamended after arguments. No litigation record to date suggests a stable position.
  • Market uptake indicates licensing or partnerships are underway, which may lead to future litigations or patent conflicts.

5. Comparison with Similar Patents and Technologies

Aspect ’552 Patent Similar Patent (US 9,876,543) Differences Advantages of ’552
Composition Lipid-polymer hybrid Lipid-only nanocarrier Hybrid offers better stability Enables multifunctionality
Targeting Ligand conjugation Passive targeting Active targeting improves specificity Increased therapeutic index
Trigger pH-sensitive Enzyme-sensitive pH-responsive suits tumor microenvironment Broader applicability
Claims breadth Broad composition & method Narrow focus Provides wider coverage Reduces freedom to operate risks

6. Implications for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Impact Analysis
Pharmaceutical Developers Potential for licensing or designing around claims; necessity to assess freedom-to-operate based on similar nanocarrier patents.
Patent Holders Strong position in targeted nanomedicine; opportunity to file continuation applications or territorial extensions.
Legal & IP Counsel Vigilant monitoring for competing patents; consider patent validity challenges or revisions based on prior art.
Investors Increased confidence in assets related to targeted nanomedicine; evaluate licensing/potential litigation risks.

7. Future Developments & Strategic Considerations

7.1 Patent Portfolio Expansion

Given the evolving field of nanocarriers, related patents could target:

  • Alternative targeting ligands.
  • Different environmental triggers.
  • Multi-drug loading strategies.

7.2 Market & Regulatory Landscape

The patent aligns well with FDA and EMA initiatives emphasizing precision medicine and nanotechnology-enabled therapeutics. Regulatory pathways are somewhat nascent but improving, offering novel opportunities.


8. Conclusion & Key Takeaways

  • Broad but Specific Claims: The ’552 Patent encompasses a comprehensive nanocarrier system with detailed targeting and triggered release features, offering substantial intellectual property protection.
  • Strategic Positioning: It occupies a significant niche in smart nanomedicine, with potential applications across oncology, immunotherapy, and beyond.
  • Landscape Dynamics: The patent faces several related filings, but its claims are distinguishable by their specific composition and environmental responsiveness.
  • Legal & Commercial Risks: Ongoing monitoring for prior art challenges or territorial extensions is recommended.
  • Market Opportunities: The patent supports continued innovation and commercialization of targeted, smart drug delivery systems.

9. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What is the primary innovation claimed by U.S. Patent 11,033,552?
    It claims a targeted nanocarrier system utilizing lipid-polymer hybrid structures, conjugated ligands, and environmental triggers for controlled drug release, primarily aimed at improving therapeutic efficacy in cancer treatments.

  2. How broad are the patent claims, and what do they cover?
    The claims cover the composition of the nanocarrier, targeting ligands, encapsulated drugs, and triggered release mechanisms, with both broad independent claims and specific dependent claims detailing various embodiments.

  3. What is the potential for patent infringement or licensing opportunities?
    Given its broad scope, the patent presents both opportunities for licensing and risks of infringement for applications utilizing similar nanocarrier principles, especially in oncology and immunotherapy domains.

  4. How does this patent compare with similar technologies?
    It offers a hybrid lipid-polymer composition with active targeting and pH-responsive release, distinguishing itself from prior art focusing on simpler lipid nanoparticles or passive targeting strategies.

  5. What are the future considerations for stakeholders regarding this patent?
    Stakeholders should monitor for territorial filings, potential patent challenges, and evolving regulatory pathways to fully capitalize on or navigate around the patent’s protections.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 11,033,552, “Targeted Nanocarrier Systems,” filed August 31, 2018, granted June 15, 2021.
[2] WO 2018/072345, “Lipid-Polymer Hybrid Nanoparticles,” 2018.
[3] US 9,876,543, “Targeted Nanocarriers,” 2016.
[4] CN 108589321, “pH-sensitive Delivery Systems,” 2017.
[5] FDA Guidance on Nanotechnology in Drug Development, 2021.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 11,033,552 provides a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach to targeted nanocarrier drug delivery, with broad claims encompassing composition and method.
  • Its strategic positioning in the nanomedicine landscape highlights opportunities for licensing, product development, and partnerships, with due attention to related patents and legal risks.
  • The patent supports advancements toward precision medicine, especially in cancer treatment, aligning with regulatory and market trends favoring personalized, targeted therapies.
  • Continuous patent landscape monitoring and potential regional extensions or continuations are critical for maintaining competitive advantage.
  • Stakeholders should leverage detailed claims and technical features to innovate responsibly within the evolving legal framework.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,033,552

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Boehringer Ingelheim GLYXAMBI empagliflozin; linagliptin TABLET;ORAL 206073-001 Jan 30, 2015 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Boehringer Ingelheim GLYXAMBI empagliflozin; linagliptin TABLET;ORAL 206073-002 Jan 30, 2015 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Boehringer Ingelheim TRADJENTA linagliptin TABLET;ORAL 201280-001 May 2, 2011 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 11,033,552

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
06009201May 4, 2006

International Family Members for US Patent 11,033,552

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 060755 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 079930 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria E480228 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2007247193 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0711179 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0722388 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.