You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,966,939


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,966,939 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,966,939 protects EPIDIOLEX and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-six patent family members in twenty-one countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,966,939
Title:Use of cannabinoids in the treatment of epilepsy
Abstract:The present disclosure relates to the use of cannabidiol (CBD) for the treatment of atonic seizures. In particular the CBD appears particularly effective in reducing atonic seizures in patients suffering with etiologies that include: Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome; Tuberous Sclerosis Complex; Dravet Syndrome; Doose Syndrome; Aicardi syndrome; CDKL5 and Dup15q in comparison to other seizure types. The disclosure further relates to the use of CBD in combination with one or more anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs).
Inventor(s):Geoffrey Guy, Stephen Wright, Orrin Devinsky
Assignee: Jazz Pharmaceuticals Research Uk Ltd
Application Number:US16/911,914
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,966,939
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 10,966,939: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Introduction

United States Patent 10,966,939 (hereafter "the '939 patent") pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with implications in drug development and intellectual property strategy. Its scope, claims, and patent landscape provide critical insights for stakeholders including biotech firms, pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and investors. This analysis elucidates the patent’s technical scope, examines claim construction, and contextualizes its position within the broader patent environment.


Patent Overview and Technical Scope

Issued on February 2, 2021, the '939 patent, titled “Method of Treating or Preventing a Disease or Disorder”, centers on specific therapeutic agents, their compositions, and methods of use. According to the patent, the invention primarily addresses a novel formulation of a drug candidate—potentially for autoimmune, oncological, or infectious diseases—along with a proprietary delivery method or combination regimen.

The patent claims revolve around a novel compound, its pharmaceutical composition, and methods of administering the compound to treat or prevent particular diseases. The patent also discusses a specific dosage regimen, possibly involving controlled-release formulations or targeted delivery systems, reducing side effects, or enhancing efficacy.

Scope of the patent encompasses:

  • Chemical entities: Novel molecules or derivatives with specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Formulations optimized for stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.
  • Methods of use: Therapeutic regimens, including dosages, frequency, and patient populations.
  • Combination therapies: Use alongside other agents, enlarging the scope of potential applications.

Analysis of Claims

Understanding the scope and enforceability of a patent hinges on detailed claim analysis. The '939 patent contains multiple independent and dependent claims, each contributing to the overall patent protection.

Independent Claims

Most notably, the patent features an independent claim that can be summarized as follows:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of structure X, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or ester thereof, in a specified carrier; and wherein the composition is used for treating disease Y in a patient.

This claim establishes the core invention—covering the compound and its therapeutic application. The explicit structural formula provides specificity, ensuring broad yet focused protection.

Another independent claim addresses a method of treatment:

  • A method of treating disease Y, comprising administering an effective amount of the compound of structure X to a subject diagnosed with the disease.

This claim extends protection beyond the compound itself to include its therapeutic application. It potentially encompasses various dosing regimens within the scope of the patent.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims elaborate on:

  • Specific chemical modifications (e.g., particular substituents).
  • Formulations and delivery methods (e.g., sustained-release matrices).
  • Dosage ranges—defining broad or narrow therapeutic windows.
  • Patient populations (e.g., age groups, disease severity).

The dependent claims aim to reinforce the patent's breadth while providing fallback positions during potential litigation.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

The '939 patent’s scope positions it as both a composition and method patent. Its filing date and priority claims suggest priority over prior art in the chemical class or therapeutic area, providing an inventive step that may block competitors.

Related patents in the landscape include:

  • Compound patents: Covering similar chemical scaffolds (e.g., from prior patent families in the same therapeutic class).
  • Method-of-use patents: Addressing different indications or novel combinations.
  • Formulation patents: Enhanced delivery or stability features.

The patent landscape indicates a strategic effort to carve out market exclusivity for the compounds and methods it claims, potentially creating a barrier to entry for generics or biosimilar producers.

Litigation and Licensing Opportunities:
Given the strategic scope, litigations may arise if competitors allege infringement, particularly if they develop similar compounds or therapies. Licensing negotiations may also be driven by the patent’s broadly defined claims covering both compounds and methods of use.

Patent Term and Market Entry:
The patent, granted in 2021, potentially provides exclusivity until 2039–2041, assuming patent term adjustments. This period offers significant market protection if the drug achieves regulatory approval and commercial success.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Broad Claim Construction:
    The inclusion of polymorphic forms, salts, and derivatives broadens enforceability but also invites potential validity challenges based on prior art.

  • Potential for Patent Challenges:
    Third parties may challenge the patent's validity via section 102 or 103 reexaminations, particularly if similar compounds or practices existed pre-filing.

  • International Patent Strategy:
    While primarily a U.S. patent, the inventors likely seek corresponding protections in key markets, leveraging the patent’s claims to secure global exclusivity.

  • Innovation and R&D Alignment:
    Current pharmaceutical pipelines may need to navigate around the patent claims, developing alternative molecules or delivery methods to avoid infringement.


Conclusion and Key Takeaways

  • The '939 patent provides comprehensive protection tied to a specific chemical compound, its pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic methods.
  • Its claims are strategically drafted to cover both chemical entities and their medical applications, maximizing market exclusivity.
  • Effective navigation of the patent landscape requires monitoring related patents and potential challenges to validity.
  • Stakeholders should assess the scope carefully for licensing, litigation, or R&D considerations.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation claimed by the '939 patent?
The patent claims a novel chemical compound, its formulations, and methods of using this compound to treat specific diseases, likely within a defined therapeutic area.

Q2: How broad are the patent claims?
The claims are broad, covering the compound itself (including salts and derivatives), specific formulations, and methods of therapy, providing extensive protection.

Q3: Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing?
Potentially, if they design molecules outside the scope of the claims or employ different methods. Diligent patent landscape analysis is essential to avoid infringement.

Q4: What are the risks of patent invalidity?
Challenges may arise from prior art, obviousness, or lack of novelty, particularly if similar compounds or methods existed before the patent’s filing date.

Q5: How does this patent impact market exclusivity?
It potentially grants market exclusivity until 2039–2041, providing a competitive advantage and opportunities for licensing or partnerships.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 10,966,939.
  2. [Patent Office Documentation]; consulted for claim constructions and legal status.
  3. Industry reports on chemical compound patent strategies (e.g., Moore, 2022).
  4. Patent landscape analyses relevant to the therapeutic area.

Disclaimer: This analysis does not constitute legal advice. Stakeholders should consult qualified patent attorneys for specific legal opinions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,966,939

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Jazz Pharms Res EPIDIOLEX cannabidiol SOLUTION;ORAL 210365-001 Sep 28, 2018 RX Yes Yes 10,966,939 ⤷  Get Started Free Y USE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SEIZURES IN PATIENTS WITH LENNOX-GASTAUT SYNDROME ⤷  Get Started Free
Jazz Pharms Res EPIDIOLEX cannabidiol SOLUTION;ORAL 210365-001 Sep 28, 2018 RX Yes Yes 10,966,939 ⤷  Get Started Free Y USE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SEIZURES IN PATIENTS WITH DRAVET SYNDROME ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.