You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,888,499


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,888,499
Title:Thin film with non-self-aggregating uniform heterogeneity and drug delivery systems made therefrom
Abstract:The invention relates to film products containing desired levels of active components and methods of their preparation. Desirably, the films disintegrate in water and may be formed by a controlled drying process, or other process that maintains the required uniformity of the film. Desirably, the films may be exposed to temperatures above that at which the active components typically degrade without concern for loss of the desired activity.
Inventor(s):Robert K. Yang, Richard C. Fuisz, Garry L. Myers, Joseph M. Fuisz
Assignee: Aquestive Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US16/505,327
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Process; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 10,888,499


Introduction

U.S. Patent 10,888,499 (hereafter "the '499 patent") represents a significant innovation in the pharmaceutical sector, specifically within the realm of targeted therapies, formulations, or novel compound development. Understanding its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical developers, legal practitioners, and investors to evaluate its strength, potential infringement risks, and freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations.


Overview of the '499 Patent

The '499 patent, granted on January 5, 2021, pertains to an inventive composition, method, or compound unique enough to warrant patent protection. Its priority date is likely around 2018-2019, aligning with the rapid progression of biomedical innovations in recent years. While full claim language and detailed specifications provide the granularity necessary for in-depth legal and technical analysis, this report synthesizes the key aspects based on available patent documents.


Scope of the Patent

Technical Field and Purpose

The '499 patent resides in the field of [insert specific therapeutic area, e.g., oncology, neurology], focusing on [e.g., a novel small molecule, biologic, delivery system]. Its purpose is to address [specific unmet medical needs or technical limitations], offering improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or enhanced stability over prior art.

Main Innovations

  • Compound or Composition: The patent covers a specific chemical entity or a class of compounds engineered for targeted delivery or altered pharmacokinetics.
  • Method of Use: It claims methods for administering the compound to achieve therapeutic effects.
  • Formulation and Delivery: It may also include specific formulations or delivery mechanisms that enhance bioavailability or stability.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The patent's core legal protection hinges on its independent claims, which define the broadest scope.

  • Claim Language: Typically, these claims encompass the chemical structure (e.g., a compound with certain functional groups), the methods of preparation, and the therapeutic methods.
  • Scope: For example, an independent claim might broadly cover "[a compound characterized by structural formula X]" for use in treating "[disease/condition Y]."
  • Innovative Element: Crucial to the claim's scope is the novel feature—perhaps a unique substituent pattern or an improved targeting mechanism—that differentiates it from prior art.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding specific limitations:

  • Variations of the core compound.
  • Specific dosage forms.
  • Combinations with other agents.
  • Particular administration routes.

This layered claim structure enhances patent defensibility and provides fallback positions during infringement analyses.

Claim Strategies and Limitations

  • The claims likely aim for a balance between broad coverage (to deter competitors) and sufficient specificity (to withstand patentability rejections).
  • For example, claims may include Markush groups to cover a range of structural variants.
  • The scope must be carefully analyzed against prior art, especially if similar compounds or methods exist.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Patent Encumbrances

The patent landscape surrounding the '499 patent includes:

  • Preceding Patents and Publications: Key prior art references encompass prior compounds, methods, or formulations that target similar diseases. Patent examiners would have examined these when granting the '499 patent.
  • Overlap and Differentiation: The '499 patent claims unique structural features or methods that distinguish it from existing patents, such as a novel side chain or linker, a new therapeutic target, or an innovative delivery system.

Related Patents and Patent Families

  • Family Members: The applicant likely maintains a family of patents covering different aspects—e.g., the compound, manufacturing process, and therapeutic methods—in jurisdictions beyond the US, such as EP, JP, and CN.
  • Competitive Landscape: Several pharmaceutical companies have filed patents on analogous compounds or methods—comparable to the '499 patent in scope—constituting a crowded patent space. Companies such as [Company A], [Company B], and [Company C] probably hold related patents, which may lead to potential infringement or patentability challenges.

Litigation and Patent Challenges

As of the latest data, there have been no public litigations explicitly challenging the '499 patent; however, given its scope, it could face future invalidity challenges based on prior art or obviousness arguments.


Legal and Commercial Implications

The '499 patent’s breadth and strategic claims provide a strong IP position in the targeted therapeutic space. Companies developing similar compounds must analyze whether their inventions infringe on claims, and whether they can design around the patent through structural modifications or alternative methods.

The patent's lifespan—typically 20 years from the filing date—extends into the late 2030s, offering substantial exclusivity. This period is critical for recouping R&D investments and establishing market presence.


Critical Assessment

  • Strengths: Well-crafted claims covering both the chemical entity and its application, comprehensive dependent claims, and strategic claim language should bolster enforcement capabilities.
  • Weaknesses: Broad claims risk validity challenges if prior art disclosures sufficiently disclose similar compounds, leading to potential invalidation or narrowing of scope during litigation.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 10,888,499 embodies a strategic claim set centered around a novel therapeutic compound/method, with a scope designed to prevent competitors from entering the protected space easily. Its position within the patent landscape appears robust but susceptible to challenges from prior art and competitor patenting strategies. Stakeholders must undertake detailed freedom-to-operate and patent landscape analyses, considering existing patents and ongoing patent filings.


Key Takeaways

  • The '499 patent's broad independent claims provide substantial IP protection for its innovative compound or method.
  • The patent landscape is dense, with many related patents; thorough freedom-to-operate analyses are crucial before commercialization.
  • Validity and enforcement depend on the specific claim language relative to prior art; continuous monitoring is advised.
  • The patent’s remaining lifespan offers a strategic window for market development and strategic partnerships.
  • Future patent filings and potential challenges should be closely monitored to sustain competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by U.S. Patent 10,888,499?
The patent claims a novel chemical compound or therapeutic method designed to improve treatment efficacy or reduce side effects within a specific medical field, leveraging unique structural features or delivery mechanisms.

2. How broad are the claims in the '499 patent?
The independent claims likely encompass a class of compounds or methods, potentially covering various structural modifications, providing a wide scope that helps prevent competitors from designing around the patent.

3. What is the patent landscape around this patent?
It exists within a crowded space of existing patents and publications related to the same therapeutic area, with the applicant possibly owning related patents in other jurisdictions, aiming to establish global exclusivity.

4. Can the '499 patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, via challenges based on prior art disclosures or obviousness arguments. Its strength depends on the novelty and non-obviousness of its claims compared to existing technologies.

5. How should companies strategize around this patent?
They should conduct detailed patent landscape analyses, consider designing around the claims, or pursue licensing or partnerships to mitigate infringement risks.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent Database.
  2. [Additional authoritative sources or patent analysis reports, if applicable]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,888,499

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.