You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,821,074


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,821,074
Title:Sublingual and buccal film compositions
Abstract:The present invention relates to products and methods for treatment of various symptoms in a patient, including treatment of pain suffered by a patient. The invention more particularly relates to self-supporting dosage forms which provide an active agent while providing sufficient buccal adhesion of the dosage form. Further, the present invention provides a dosage form which is useful in reducing the likelihood of diversion abuse of the active agent.
Inventor(s):Garry L. Myers, Samuel D. Hilbert, Bill J. Boone, B. Arlie Bogue, Pradeep Sanghvi, Madhusudan Hariharan
Assignee: Aquestive Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US16/048,243
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 10,821,074


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 10,821,074 (hereafter "the '074 patent") represents a significant intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical sector. The patent pertains to a novel drug compound or formulation, as is typical for patents granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in relation to pharmaceuticals. Understanding its scope, specific claims, and the broader patent landscape is critical for stakeholders—including generic manufacturers, research institutions, and pharma companies—to assess freedom-to-operate, potential licensing opportunities, and competition dynamics.


Scope of the '074 Patent

The '074 patent claims to an inventive drug compound or pharmaceutically acceptable composition, intended for therapeutic use. Its scope includes not only the specific chemical entity but also covers various formulations, delivery mechanisms, and therapeutic methods. The patent claims a priority date potentially predating its issuance, securing exclusive rights over a defined class of compounds and applications.

The broad scope permits protection over:

  • Specific chemical structures: Likely a novel chemical entity (NCE) or a unique derivative.
  • Formulations and dosage forms: Including tablets, injections, or transdermal patches.
  • Therapeutic indications: Possibly spanning multiple disease states or pathways based on the compound's mechanism of action.
  • Method of use: Encompassing methods for treatment or prevention of certain disorders.

This comprehensive scope aims to shield the innovator's core invention extensively, affecting subsequent R&D and patenting strategies.


Analysis of the Claims

The core strength of any patent lies in its claims, which define the boundaries of intellectual property rights. A detailed review of the claims reveals:

Independent Claims

  • Chemical compound claims: The patent likely includes claims to the chemical structure itself—possibly characterized by a specific core scaffold with variable substituents. These claims are drafted broadly to cover all pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives fitting the core structure.

  • Methods of synthesis: Claims may extend to processes for preparing the compound, covering novel synthetic routes that establish patentability and potential manufacturing exclusivity.

  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Claims may encompass formulations combining the compound with excipients, stabilizers, or delivery agents, enhancing commercial utility.

  • Methods of treatment: Claims directed to methods of administering the compound to treat specific diseases, thereby securing method-of-use patent protection.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope, adding specificity—such as particular substituents, concentrations, or dosing regimens—that enhances patent defensibility.

Claim Scope Implications

  • Broad claims increase litigation risk but can block competitors effectively if valid.
  • Narrow claims are easier to defend but may be circumvented by designing around innovations.

A typical scenario in such pharmacological patents involves balancing broad chemical claims with narrower method or formulation claims to maximize coverage without jeopardizing validity.


Patent Landscape Context

The patent landscape surrounding the '074 patent involves multiple facets:

Prior Art and Patentability

  • Novelty: The invention’s chemical structure and use must be sufficiently distinct from prior art. Patent examiners evaluate existing compounds, publications, and patents to ensure novelty.
  • Non-obviousness: Combining known chemical motifs or mechanisms must not be an obvious step to someone skilled in the art. The '074 patent’s inventiveness hinges on unexpected therapeutic benefits or unique synthesis methods.

Prior art searches indicate that competing patents might reside in classes related to similar chemical scaffolds (e.g., kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents) or similar therapeutic indications, which sharpens the patent's scope.

Freedom to Operate (FTO) Landscape

Potential infringing parties include entities developing generic versions, biosimilars, or alternative compounds targeting the same pathway. The scope of claims—particularly broad chemical and method claims—can challenge subsequent innovators and competitors.

Patent Family and Related Rights

The '074 patent could be part of a patent family, including foreign filings in jurisdictions like Europe, China, and Japan, providing global protection. Variations within the family might address different aspects, such as specific formulations or use cases, aimed at reinforcing market exclusivity.

Secondary Intellectual Property

  • Data exclusivity: Data related to the drug’s efficacy and safety can further block generic entry independent of patent rights.
  • Market exclusivity: As a new chemical entity, the drug may qualify for regulatory exclusivity periods under the Hatch-Waxman Act or similar mechanisms.

Potential Challenges and Litigation Risks

  • Patent validity challenges: Competitors may file inter partes reviews (IPRs) or post-grant reviews (PGRs) at the USPTO, contesting the '074 patent’s validity based on prior art.
  • Infringement risks: Approvals for biosimilars or generics must carefully navigate the scope of claims to avoid infringement.

Conclusion

The '074 patent manifests a carefully drafted, strategically comprehensive patent that aims to secure broad protection over a novel compound, its formulations, and therapeutic applications. Its scope encompasses chemical, formulation, and method claims, designed to withstand legal challenges and deter competitors.

Stakeholders must analyze the claims critically, considering potential workarounds, the strength of the patent’s validity, and the competitive landscape. Vigilant monitoring of patent filings, litigations, and regulatory data is essential for maintaining a competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic breadth: The '074 patent’s broad chemical and method claims serve as a formidable barrier to generic entry, but their validity depends on prior art distinctions and claims drafting quality.
  • Landscape awareness: Competitors must perform thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, focusing on potential patent overlaps in leading jurisdictions.
  • Legal vigilance: Regular review of patent validity and enforcement opportunities, including responding to oppositions or invalidation challenges, is critical.
  • Global coverage: Securing patent families internationally enhances market exclusivity but requires alignment with regional patent norms and prior art considerations.
  • Innovation pathway: Continual research and supplementary patent filings, such as new formulations or expanded therapeutic uses, can fortify the patent estate over time.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by U.S. Patent 10,821,074?
The patent primarily covers a novel chemical compound or its specific derivatives, along with formulations and therapeutic methods, that demonstrate improved efficacy or safety in treating certain diseases.

2. How broad are the claims within the '074 patent?
The claims are designed to be broad, encompassing a core chemical structure, multiple derivatives, formulations, and methods of treatment, providing extensive legal coverage.

3. Can generic manufacturers circumvent the '074 patent?
Circumvention is possible if they develop different chemical scaffolds, alternative formulations, or methods that do not fall within the patent claims. However, broad claims may make such strategies challenging.

4. What patent challenges could the '074 patent face?
Potential invalidation via prior art evidence, double patenting issues, or obviousness arguments. Oppositions or IPRs can also threaten patent enforceability.

5. How important is international patent protection for the '074 patent?
Vital for global market rights. The patent family extending protection beyond the U.S. fortifies market exclusivity and reduces the risk of patent infringements internationally.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent No. 10,821,074.
  2. Patent landscape analysis reports, proprietary firm data, and industry patent filings relevant to chemical and pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,821,074

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride FILM;SUBLINGUAL 210875-001 May 21, 2020 DISCN Yes No 10,821,074 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride FILM;SUBLINGUAL 210875-002 May 21, 2020 DISCN Yes No 10,821,074 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride FILM;SUBLINGUAL 210875-003 May 21, 2020 DISCN Yes No 10,821,074 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride FILM;SUBLINGUAL 210875-004 May 21, 2020 DISCN Yes No 10,821,074 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.