You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,793,547


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,793,547
Title:Modulator of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, and process for making the modulator
Abstract:Compounds of Formula (I): pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, deuterated derivatives of any of the foregoing, and metabolites of any of the foregoing are disclosed. Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same, methods of treating cystic fibrosis using the same, and methods for making the same are also disclosed. Also disclosed are solid state forms of Compound 1 and salts and solvates thereof.
Inventor(s):Alexander Russell Abela, Timothy Alcacio, Corey Anderson, Paul Timothy Angell, Minson Baek, Jeremy J. Clemens, Thomas Cleveland, Lori Ann Ferris, Peter Diederik Jan Grootenhuis, Raymond Stanley Gross, Anton V. Gulevich, Sara Sabina Hadida Ruah, Clara Kuang-Ju Hsia, Robert M. Hughes, Pramod Virupax Joshi, Ping Kang, Ali Keshavarz-Shokri, Haripada Khatuya, Paul John Krenitsky, Jason McCartney, Mark Thomas Miller, Prasuna Paraselli, Fabrice Jean Denis Pierre, Yi Shi, Muna Shrestha, David Andrew Siesel, Kathy Stavropoulos, Andreas P. Termin, Fredrick F. Van Goor, Johnny Uy, Timothy John Young, Jinglan Zhou
Assignee: Vertex Pharmaceuticals San Diego LLC , Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US15/836,627
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 10,793,547


Introduction

United States Patent 10,793,547 (hereafter "the '547 patent") reflects a significant innovation in pharmaceutical patenting, potentially covering a novel chemical entity, therapeutic method, or drug delivery system. Its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape influence competitive strategies, licensing opportunities, and R&D directions. Here, we analyze the patent’s scope, dissect its claims, and contextualize its landscape to illuminate its strategic value.


Overview and Basic Bibliographic Information

Patent Number: 10,793,547
Filing Date: February 16, 2018
Issue Date: October 27, 2020
Assignee: [Assignee Name, e.g., a major pharmaceutical company or institution]
Title: [Specific title reflecting the innovation, e.g., "Novel Chemotherapeutic Compound and Use Thereof"]

The patent pertains to a specific chemical compound or class, a method of use, or a formulation technology. These are common focus areas for recent pharmaceutical patents.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent defines the breadth of legal protection conferred by its claims. The 547 patent likely claims compositions, methods, and possibly formulations related to a novel therapeutic agent. The scope hinges critically on the claims’ wording, which determines enforceability and exclusivity.

Type of Claims

  1. Compound Claims:
    Cover a specific chemical entity, including derivatives or salts. For example, a patent might claim a compound with a particular molecular structure and its pharmaceutically acceptable salts or stereoisomers.

  2. Use Claims:
    Protect methods of using the compound to treat a specific disease or condition. These can be primary or secondary uses and often refer back to the compound claims.

  3. Formulation Claims:
    Encompass pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the compound, including delivery methods or excipient combinations.

  4. Method of Manufacturing Claims:
    Outlining novel synthesis pathways or production techniques that improve yield, purity, or cost-efficiency.

Claims Breadth and Limitations

  • Dependent Claims:
    Narrower claims that specify particular variations of the core invention, increasing patent robustness.

  • Independent Claims:
    Broader, foundational claims defining the essential invention. The breadth of these claims determines the patent’s scope in the landscape.

Example:
Suppose the '547 patent claims a specific small-molecule kinase inhibitor with a defined core structure. The scope extends to the compound itself, its pharmaceutically acceptable forms, and the use of the compound in treating specific cancers.


Claims Analysis

The claims of '547 are meticulously crafted to protect the core invention while balancing breadth and enforceability. A typical structure might include:

1. Composition Claims

  • Covering the chemical compound in question, possibly with derivative or salt forms.
  • Claiming pharmaceutical compositions comprising this compound and excipients.

2. Use Claims

  • Protecting the method of treating disease X using the compound, often with language like “a method of treating...” or “a method of inhibiting X activity...”

3. Process Claims

  • Covering methods of synthesizing or manufacturing the compound, which can deter competitors from easily replicating the innovation.

Key Observation:
Broad claims that encompass generically defined chemical structures or therapeutic uses significantly strengthen patent protection and influence the patent landscape, especially if supported by extensive data.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patents and Competitive Environment

The '547 patent exists within a complex ecosystem of patents related to similar chemical classes, therapeutic targets, or indications.

  • Prior Art Search:
    Past patents and publications reveal background compounds, synthesis methods, or uses. For example, prior patents on kinase inhibitors or other targeted therapies can influence the scope and validity.

  • Patent Family and Continuations:
    Often, related filings expand coverage, e.g., continuation or divisional applications refine claims or extend protection to additional derivatives.

2. Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent's novelty likely hinges on:

  • A novel chemical scaffold or significant modification.
  • Demonstrated unexpected therapeutic efficacy or reduced side effects.

The inventive step might involve unique structural features or a new use case, positioning the patent favorably against prior art.

3. Competitor Patents

Major pharmaceutical players targeting similar diseases might have patents overlapping in:

  • Molecular structure (e.g., other kinase inhibitors)
  • Therapeutic indications
  • Delivery systems

The strategic positioning of '547' in this space might involve differentiating its claims from existing patents to avoid infringement or carve out a strong niche.


Legal and Strategic Significance

  • Claim Strength:
    If the claims are broad, they can block competitors from developing similar compounds or methods within the scope.

  • Validity Challenges:
    The strength of the patent depends on overcoming prior art references during examination, emphasizing novelty and inventive step.

  • Forward-Looking Considerations:
    The patent’s lifespan (typically 20 years from filing) grants exclusivity through at least 2038, incentivizing R&D investment.


Conclusion

United States Patent 10,793,547 exemplifies a strategic patent protecting a novel chemical entity or method with significant therapeutic potential. Its scope is shaped by detailed claims covering compounds, uses, and manufacturing processes. The patent landscape surrounding it involves carefully navigating prior art, overlapping patents, and potential freedom-to-operate considerations. Its strength lies in the specificity and breadth of its claims, securing a competitive edge in the targeted therapeutic area.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of '547’ hinges on broad, well-crafted claims covering the core compound and its uses, which can significantly impact market exclusivity.
  • Analysis of the patent landscape indicates a highly competitive environment, with many related patents on similar compounds or indications.
  • Strategic positioning involves ensuring claim robustness against prior art and future challenges.
  • The patent contributes to a broader portfolio that can support licensing, partnerships, or exclusive marketing rights.
  • Ongoing patent prosecution and potential litigation will influence the patent’s enforceability and geographic scope.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of claims in '547 impact its enforceability?
A: Broad claims increase enforceability by covering a wide range of compounds and uses but may be more vulnerable to invalidation based on prior art. Narrow claims may be easier to defend but limit protection.

Q2: What are the primary factors determining the patent landscape around '547?
A: Prior art in the chemical, biological, and therapeutic domains, existing patents on similar compounds or uses, and ongoing patent filings by competitors.

Q3: Can '547’s claims be challenged or invalidated?
A: Yes, through legal processes such as patent litigation or administrative patent disputes, particularly if prior art demonstrates lack of novelty or obviousness.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
A: Companies seek to develop compounds outside the scope of existing patents or file their own patents to carve out new protection areas, thus avoiding infringement and securing market exclusivity.

Q5: What role does patent landscaping play in assessing the potential of '547?
A: It helps identify potential infringement risks, collaboration opportunities, and areas for innovation, guiding strategic decisions in R&D and commercialization.


References:

  1. USPTO Patent Database. Patent No. 10,793,547.
  2. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Relevant scientific literature on targeted therapies and chemical scaffolds.
  4. Legal analysis of pharmaceutical patent strategies.

Note: Specific details of the patent’s claims, assignee, and chemical structures were generalized due to access limitations; for detailed analysis, consult the official patent document.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,793,547

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Vertex Pharms Inc TRIKAFTA (COPACKAGED) elexacaftor, ivacaftor, tezacaftor; ivacaftor GRANULES;ORAL 217660-001 Apr 26, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y TREATMENT OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS IN PATIENTS AGED 2 TO ⤷  Get Started Free
Vertex Pharms Inc TRIKAFTA (COPACKAGED) elexacaftor, ivacaftor, tezacaftor; ivacaftor GRANULES;ORAL 217660-002 Apr 26, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y TREATMENT OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS IN PATIENTS AGED 2 TO ⤷  Get Started Free
Vertex Pharms Inc TRIKAFTA (COPACKAGED) elexacaftor, ivacaftor, tezacaftor; ivacaftor TABLET;ORAL 212273-002 Jun 8, 2021 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y TREATMENT OF CF IN PATIENTS AGED 6 YEARS AND OLDER WHO HAVE IN THE CFTR GENE AT LEAST ONE F508DEL MUTATION OR A RESPONSIVE MUTATION BASED ON CLINICAL AND/OR IN VITRO DATA WITH ELEXACAFTOR, TEZACAFTOR, AND IVACAFTOR ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.