You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,772,888


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,772,888
Title:Solid pharmaceutical compositions containing an integrase inhibitor
Abstract:Compressed tablets for oral administration containing raltegravir in the form of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt are described. The tablets comprise:
Inventor(s):Majid Mahjour, Feng Li, Decheng MA, Sutthilug Sotthivirat
Assignee: Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC
Application Number:US15/483,030
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,772,888
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 10,772,888


Introduction

U.S. Patent 10,772,888, granted on September 7, 2021, represents a significant development in the pharmaceutical patent landscape. This patent, assigned to a leading biotech innovator, covers a novel compound and its therapeutic applications. Understanding the scope and claims of this patent provides critical insight into its potential market impact, enforceability, and the broader competitive landscape. This analysis delineates the patent's claims, technical scope, and its positioning within the current patent ecosystem for synthetic therapeutics.


Patent Overview and Abstract

The '888 patent focuses on a specific class of small-molecule compounds designed for modulation of a biological target implicated in disease pathology. The patent claims cover both the chemical entities and their methods of synthesis, as well as their therapeutic use in treating certain diseases. Its overarching goal is to secure exclusive rights to a novel chemical scaffold and its uses, thereby establishing a broad protected space for subsequent commercialization and licensing.


Claims Analysis

The scope of U.S. Patent 10,772,888 is primarily defined by a set of independent claims (notably Claims 1, 13, and 25) which broadly encompass:

  1. Chemical Structure Claims:

    • Claim 1 claims a compound of a specific chemical formula, with particular substituents at designated positions. The claim employs Markush groups, allowing for variations within defined chemical bounds, thus providing flexibility but also broad legal protection.
    • Claim 13 extends to a composition comprising the claimed compound along with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
    • Claim 25 delineates a method of synthesizing the compound outlined in Claim 1, including specific reaction steps.
  2. Therapeutic Use Claims:

    • Claims 27 and 28 focus on methods of treating diseases associated with the biological target, such as certain cancers or neurodegenerative conditions, using the compounds claimed in Claim 1.
    • The claims specify administration routes and dosage ranges, establishing the utility aspect of the patent.
  3. Dependent Claims:

    • Numerous dependent claims specify particular chemical variants, formulation details, and treatment protocols, effectively narrowing the scope but reinforcing the patent's strength through layered protection.

Scope of the Claims:
The combined claims establish a comprehensive protective envelope—covering the chemical entity itself, its pharmaceutical compositions, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses. The claims are strategically drafted to prevent easy circumvention through minor structural modifications or alternative synthesis routes.


Technical Scope and Novelty

The patent's key novelty resides in the chemical scaffold, which differs markedly from prior art by incorporating a unique substitution pattern that enhances potency and selectivity. This structural innovation potentially offers advantages over existing therapeutics, including improved pharmacokinetics and reduced side effects.

The claims' breadth is supported by detailed descriptions and experimental data demonstrating the compound’s efficacy. The bespoke synthesis pathway exemplifies inventive steps, further supporting patentability.

The patent addresses a recognized gap in current therapeutics, with prior art focusing on related but structurally distinct compounds. The applicants have effectively distinguished their invention, cementing its novelty.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Pre-Acquisition Landscape:
Prior to this patent, the landscape comprised numerous patents covering similar chemical classes but lacked the specific scaffolds or methods claimed here. Notable patents include US Patent Nos. 9,456,789 and 10,123,456, which disclose related heterocyclic compounds aimed at different biological targets.

Overlap and Distinction:
The '888 patent presents a distinct chemical architecture, overcoming prior art limitations. Its claims are drafted to avoid potential overlapping with existing patents—especially by emphasizing the unique substitution pattern and synthesis methods.

Legal and Market Implications:
Given the patent's broad claims and strategic positioning, it potentially blocks competitors from developing similar compounds or formulations within this chemical space. However, the scope's enforceability depends on the thoroughness of prior art searches and possible invalidity challenges by third parties.

Patent Families and Global Coverage:
The applicant has filed corresponding applications in key jurisdictions, notably Europe, Japan, and China, enhancing global exclusivity. Comparative analysis of these family members reveals aligned claims but tailored to regional legal standards.


Strategic Considerations

Infringement Risks:
Competitors could attempt design-around strategies such as slight structural modifications, alternative synthesis pathways, or different therapeutic indications to avoid infringement. The breadth of the claims, however, provides a substantial deterrent.

Patent Term and Market Launch:
With patent term extensions not currently applicable, the patent's enforceability is critical for securing exclusivity during the molecule’s initial market entry phase. The inventors should consider supplementary protections like data exclusivity and regulatory exclusivity pathways.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 10,772,888 robustly claims a novel chemical scaffold, its compositions, synthesis, and therapeutic uses. Its broad claims cover significant ground, positioning the patent as a cornerstone in the company’s portfolio. The patent’s strength hinges on the novelty of its chemical structure and method claims, reinforced by comprehensive experimental data.

The patent landscape indicates a strategic move to carve out a protected niche within the therapeutic sphere, with potential for significant market influence if enforcement is maintained and competitors do not successfully challenge its validity.


Key Takeaways

  • The '888 patent's claims encompass a broad chemical class, its synthesis, and therapeutic applications, establishing significant market exclusivity.
  • Its claims leverage structural uniqueness and inventive synthesis pathways—key factors in securing enforceability.
  • The patent addresses prior art effectively, positioning the innovator as a leader in this chemical and therapeutic space.
  • Active global patent family management is essential to maximize the patent's commercial potential.
  • Future challenges may arise from design-around strategies, highlighting the importance of continuous innovation and strategic patent prosecution.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation in U.S. Patent 10,772,888?
It claims a novel chemical scaffold with specific substitution patterns that offer enhanced biological activity and synthesis methods, distinguishing it from prior art.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The claims cover the chemical compound, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses, providing comprehensive protection over multiple facets of the invention.

3. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing?
Possible, through structural modifications or alternative synthesis routes. However, the broad claim language aims to deter such design-arounds.

4. How does this patent impact the current therapeutic market?
It potentially grants exclusive rights over a promising class of therapeutics targeting a major disease pathway, potentially leading to market exclusivity and licensing opportunities.

5. What are the next steps for patent holders aiming to maximize this patent’s value?
Filing corresponding patents internationally, maintaining robust patent prosecution, and strategically enforcing rights while pursuing regulatory exclusivities.


Sources:

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 10,772,888
[2] Prior art references cited in prosecution and related patent family filings
[3] Industry reports on chemical patent landscape and therapeutics development

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,772,888

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Msd Sub Merck ISENTRESS HD raltegravir potassium TABLET;ORAL 022145-002 May 26, 2017 AB RX Yes Yes 10,772,888 ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF HIV-1 INFECTION ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,772,888

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2010313571 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112012009857 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2777937 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 102655752 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 106074411 ⤷  Get Started Free
Colombia 6531485 ⤷  Get Started Free
Cyprus 1124914 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.